PDA

View Full Version : Yonex SHT-304: What's the catch?


Serve 'em hard
05-24-2007, 05:12 PM
I've been on this planet long enough to know that if something sounds too good to be true, it's probably is. And that there always trade-offs and compromises. When it comes to shoes, it was my impression you had to choose between cushioning/etc or performance. Either your shoes were heavy and offered your knees and joints some relief from hard court pounding, or they were light and let you speed around the court.

So how could the SHT-304's be both very light AND as well-cushioned and comfy as claimed? What's the catch with these shoes? They sound too good to be true.

Voltron
05-24-2007, 05:15 PM
This exact thread has been made, use the search function.

Serve 'em hard
05-24-2007, 05:20 PM
This exact thread has been made, use the search function.

No. I don't believe in searching except in certain circumstancs. This isn't one of them.

Voltron
05-24-2007, 05:21 PM
^^^^^

Fine then, you'll get no help from me, even though I have the answer.

Serve 'em hard
05-24-2007, 05:40 PM
^^^^^

Fine then, you'll get no help from me, even though I have the answer.

Come on. Tell me. You know you want to!!

Craig Sheppard
05-24-2007, 05:43 PM
Yeah, i answered this question last week. Do a search Mr. Lazy.

Voltron
05-24-2007, 05:46 PM
Come on. Tell me. You know you want to!! I decline.

AAAA
05-24-2007, 05:52 PM
There's no catch if you are light enough. The Adidas FYW shoes circa 2000(?) were light, low to the ground and provided all the cushioning my non bulky frame needed. Of course if you are built like becker then you may not get all those qualities in one shoe.

Voltron
05-24-2007, 05:55 PM
There's no catch if you are light enough. The Adidas FYW shoes circa 2000(?) were light, low to the ground and provided all the cushioning my non bulky frame needed. Of course if you are built like becker then you may not get all those qualities in one shoe.
Gahhhhh, edit your post, don't help Mr. Lazy!!

Serve 'em hard
05-24-2007, 05:56 PM
I decline.

Come on, spill it!! I don't even care what other posters say about this shoe anymore -- I only want YOUR opinion!:p

AAAA
05-24-2007, 05:58 PM
Gahhhhh, edit your post, don't help Mr. Lazy!!

I'm in a charitable mindset.

Serve 'em hard
05-24-2007, 05:59 PM
I'm in a charitable mindset.

You're a good man, and deserve all those A's...

Voltron
05-24-2007, 06:01 PM
I'm in a charitable mindset.
Damn you! You ruined it all!!!! ;);)J/K;);)

AAAA
05-24-2007, 06:01 PM
You're a good man, and deserve all those A's...

Some other posters would disagree.

Serve 'em hard
05-25-2007, 11:11 AM
I decline.


How about now?

Serve 'em hard
05-25-2007, 05:10 PM
There's no catch if you are light enough. The Adidas FYW shoes circa 2000(?) were light, low to the ground and provided all the cushioning my non bulky frame needed. Of course if you are built like becker then you may not get all those qualities in one shoe.

Are you speaking of the Yonex 304, or just speculating it's like the Adidas?

And what qualifies as a non bulky frame? How tall, what weight?

Serve 'em hard
05-25-2007, 05:15 PM
Yeah, i answered this question last week. Do a search Mr. Lazy.

Weren't you the K-Swiss Defier dude? How do those shoes compare to the Yonex in your opinion? I just got a pair of Defier's myself. Too early to tell what I think of 'em.

zapvor
05-25-2007, 05:41 PM
I decline.

Gahhhhh, edit your post, don't help Mr. Lazy!!

Damn you! You ruined it all!!!! ;);)J/K;);)

lol you always manage to crack me up....batman.

Serve 'em hard
05-26-2007, 11:16 PM
^^^^^

even though I have the answer.

What is it?