View Full Version : M-fil 200 vs Aerogel 200?
09-25-2007, 02:23 PM
How much (if at all) does the old M-fil 200 differ from the new(ish) Aerogel 200? I'm just wondering if it's worth changing at all? (I currently use the M-fil)
09-25-2007, 04:33 PM
09-25-2007, 08:29 PM
How much (if at all) does the old M-fil 200 differ from the new(ish) Aerogel 200? I'm just wondering if it's worth changing at all? (I currently use the M-fil) I think the Aerogel 200 plays with an indescribable rightness. More than sweet; more than accurate; some even say it is a bit tense (not I, but compared to the old MW 200, yes). It is great fun. :-D
11-17-2007, 11:53 PM
bump bump, i wanna know as well!
11-18-2007, 08:09 AM
I heard the butt caps had a tendancy to fall off on the old M-fils so it'd be interesting to see if they fixed that..
11-18-2007, 06:08 PM
I didn't care for either one, the 200's just keep getting worse and worse. The MW 200G 95 was the last really good players racquet Dunlop made IMO. Unless Dunlop re-issues the MW 200G, I can't see myself considering another 200 in the future.
11-19-2007, 06:18 AM
I agree. The 200GMW is the nicest players frame Dunlop has put out in years. It is a demanding frame initially, but once you get dialed into it, it is predictable & comfortable, with decent spin and power.
11-19-2007, 09:28 AM
Djokovic is that what you have underneath your nBlade paintjob? A nice Dunlop?
vBulletin® v3.6.9, Copyright ©2000-2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.