PDA

View Full Version : Yes, CONNORS is top 10 of all time--READ BELOW


Connors
06-05-2008, 06:29 PM
-139 singles titles won--that's ONE HUNDRED THIRTY NINE!!

-1337 match wins--most ever

-82% winning record

-8 Grand Slam titles--don't forget, I did not play Australian Open hardly at all

-7 Grand Slam finals

-counting season ending Masters', TWENTY-THREE semi-finals (that's 23)

-10 Grand Slam Quarterfinals

***268 weeks at Number One. Over 300 weeks at #2 or #3--THAT MEANS JIMMY CONNORS WAS IN THE TOP THREE FOR WELL OVER 11 YEARS!!!!

--semifinalist at US Open in '91 at age 39.

People who don't realize my accomplishments or appreciate what I've done haven't studied the history of the game. To say I'm not top 10 indicates your stupidity.

Vision84
06-05-2008, 07:15 PM
Are you really Jimmy Connors? If not then go away troll.

Besides as I have said many times to many variables across generations to come up with a decent list of GOAT players.

Connors
06-05-2008, 08:15 PM
So...who are you, Mr. Tennis Warehouse? I could give a crap what you think.

Phil
06-05-2008, 08:25 PM
Anyone who knows anything about tennis puts JC in the top 10 (or top 5) GOAT's. So this is kind of a stupid-waste-of-time-post on your part, "Jimmy".

Vision84
06-05-2008, 08:26 PM
If you are in fact Jimmy Connors like you claim in your post then you have nothing to be insulted about from my post.

TennisLover17
06-05-2008, 09:34 PM
Lol 1337. what a coincidence

love means nothing
06-05-2008, 09:40 PM
connors also missed the french 5 years and only played the aussie twice, and the us open was on clay 3 years. so he could have had many more slams, too.

statistically, he rates very high.

spiritdragon
06-05-2008, 09:53 PM
Lol 1337. what a coincidence

lol, i was gonna say the same thing. i dont feel like looking it up but it would be funny if it really was true.

Lendl and Federer Fan
06-05-2008, 09:54 PM
Shouldn't this belong to the "Former Pro Player Talk" section? :)

Rhino
06-06-2008, 12:29 AM
It's all about the majors Jimmy. Roger could easily clock up 1337 match wins if he played more tournaments. I mean if he bothered, he could win Newport 10 years in a row for instance, but people only remember Grand slam singles titles so why bother?