PDA

View Full Version : Baggy's Tecnifibre?


Noveson
06-28-2008, 05:25 PM
Is it one of the new ones or what? Does anybody know what it is?

Freedom
06-28-2008, 05:51 PM
I heard it's his old Fischer, but repainted...

LPShanet
06-28-2008, 08:45 PM
Is it one of the new ones or what? Does anybody know what it is?

So far it's a PJ on his old Fischer. Apparently TF bought the mold from Fischer. TF is introducing a new range of T Flashes, and his frame will be a PJ of one of those (the new T Flash 315).

MAXXply
06-28-2008, 09:53 PM
Why couldn't Tecnifibre just keep their simple paintjobs on the new range? The latest ones look ridiculous. Someone will make a tidy profit snapping up the older (Tipsarevic et.al) sticks.

Feņa14
06-28-2008, 10:08 PM
Why couldn't Tecnifibre just keep their simple paintjobs on the new range? The latest ones look ridiculous. Someone will make a tidy profit snapping up the older (Tipsarevic et.al) sticks.

Yeah I know what you mean.

I still think the old 325 paintjob was the nicest, the 320 and 335 aren't bad, but the new ones are pretty poor.

I think something really simple in red and black would be perfect as the font Tecnifibre use is really good looking, that alone is enough to make the paintjob imo.

Cup8489
06-28-2008, 11:26 PM
anyone have any pictures? i haven't seen any of the new pj's in a match so far.

King_roger
06-29-2008, 01:26 AM
http://d.yimg.com/a/p/sp/getty/b8/fullj.02cca3ac74568e0ac0160ac41f7d4c3d/02cca3ac74568e0ac0160ac41f7d4c3d-getty-tennis-gbr-wimbledon.jpg

http://d.yimg.com/a/p/sp/getty/fc/fullj.0b56a0b68f48d1a3f6fd1aaec35e8e59/0b56a0b68f48d1a3f6fd1aaec35e8e59-getty-tennis-gbr-wimbledon.jpg

http://d.yimg.com/a/p/sp/getty/cc/fullj.bb61cf451689427d9696f30367a5df71/bb61cf451689427d9696f30367a5df71-getty-tennis-gbr-wimbledon.jpg

definitely a Fischer.

LafayetteHitter
06-29-2008, 01:54 AM
Yea, sure does look like the Fischer headshape.

Barca tennis
06-29-2008, 03:04 AM
It's not a Tecnifibre!!!!
:)

jura
06-29-2008, 08:12 AM
As said before: TF "rebuilded" Baggys Fischer racket. But they didn't have to buy the mold - it's a free mold and you can order this racket from every factory that opened this mold. There was at least one copy of this racket more than ten years ago. And now TF made his "new" T.Flash 315 from this mold.

federer envies me
06-29-2008, 09:47 AM
that racquet looks pretty sick

Noveson
06-29-2008, 12:08 PM
Yeah I know what you mean.

I still think the old 325 paintjob was the nicest, the 320 and 335 aren't bad, but the new ones are pretty poor.

I think something really simple in red and black would be perfect as the font Tecnifibre use is really good looking, that alone is enough to make the paintjob imo.

The 325 paintjob was my least favorite, although I still liked it. The other two I love how they look.

So far it's a PJ on his old Fischer. Apparently TF bought the mold from Fischer. TF is introducing a new range of T Flashes, and his frame will be a PJ of one of those (the new T Flash 315).

A T Flash? Are you sure? I don't think a pro player would be using a T Flash.

After seeing those pictures, that racquet at least, looks not too bad to me. The pictures on the website are too small to see clearly.

A_Fish
06-29-2008, 02:25 PM
What strings is Baggy using - still hybrid of Alu Power and Nat Gut? Those pics look like that. Which direction is it in? Alu Power Mains or crosses? and is it rough? What tension? Thanks

TheShaun
06-29-2008, 03:57 PM
http://d.yimg.com/a/p/sp/getty/b8/fullj.02cca3ac74568e0ac0160ac41f7d4c3d/02cca3ac74568e0ac0160ac41f7d4c3d-getty-tennis-gbr-wimbledon.jpg

http://d.yimg.com/a/p/sp/getty/fc/fullj.0b56a0b68f48d1a3f6fd1aaec35e8e59/0b56a0b68f48d1a3f6fd1aaec35e8e59-getty-tennis-gbr-wimbledon.jpg

http://d.yimg.com/a/p/sp/getty/cc/fullj.bb61cf451689427d9696f30367a5df71/bb61cf451689427d9696f30367a5df71-getty-tennis-gbr-wimbledon.jpg

definitely a Fischer.

it's a little "Fischey" if you ask me :)

RoarTT
06-29-2008, 04:27 PM
VT Pro 98 propably..

babolat15
06-29-2008, 04:49 PM
new paintjob

Fedace
06-29-2008, 04:54 PM
That is ONE awsome paint JOB....It must be a newest greatest racket technifibre has ever come up with.. what is Model number and name ??

herosol
06-29-2008, 04:57 PM
The 325 paintjob was my least favorite, although I still liked it. The other two I love how they look.



A T Flash? Are you sure? I don't think a pro player would be using a T Flash.

After seeing those pictures, that racquet at least, looks not too bad to me. The pictures on the website are too small to see clearly.

...Well you could say the same that no one really uses the nPro stock. Bagdhatis is still using his old whatever mold
If anything if you check the Tecnifibre website, the new T-Flash that "Bagdhatis Endorses" is weighted up to 11.7 oz.

A good weighted player's stick, that looks sick, and has some sick specs. truth.

f1 tech
07-01-2008, 09:55 AM
Here are close ups of the new 315.

http://i289.photobucket.com/albums/ll228/mugengsr1/315b.jpg

f1 tech
07-01-2008, 09:56 AM
http://i289.photobucket.com/albums/ll228/mugengsr1/315.jpg

f1 tech
07-01-2008, 09:57 AM
Here is the new 320.
http://i289.photobucket.com/albums/ll228/mugengsr1/320b.jpg

f1 tech
07-01-2008, 09:57 AM
http://i289.photobucket.com/albums/ll228/mugengsr1/320.jpg

f1 tech
07-01-2008, 09:58 AM
It reminds me of Japanese art.

nyc
07-01-2008, 10:06 AM
yeah, what's with the samurai on there??? TF is a french company this doesn't make any sense - what's their new tech? SUSHI? time to fire their graphics department.

herosol
07-01-2008, 10:14 AM
awesome possum.
they look HELLA SICKKK

mr. hardcourt
07-01-2008, 10:17 AM
thats one cool stick

LafayetteHitter
07-01-2008, 10:19 AM
Thats very different. Why does it say L550?

travlerajm
07-01-2008, 10:42 AM
I sat in the first row behind the baseline, several feet away from where the players return on the ad side, at Baggy's first round flameout at the FO.

I recall that his racquet looked different than the pictures posted in this thread. It looked like a Pure Drive clone, with a very wide constant beam (I estimate about 26mm). It looked to be very light by the way the ball came off his racquet -- he would take big cuts and the ball came off his strings without any sting, as if it were a 10-oz. granny stick.

I'll dig up my camera and see if I can post the pics. In the meantime, if anyone else has pics from that match, please post pics of his racquet to confirm this.

f1 tech
07-01-2008, 12:47 PM
I think the 315 looks really sweet. The PJ is bold and nothing in the market is like it.

sargeinaz
07-01-2008, 05:41 PM
Worst paintjob I have ever seen. Asian faces on a racket? Disgusting.

reesespiecestennis
07-01-2008, 05:49 PM
uggh it looks so weird.. I really liked the weight and balance of the tfight 320 I wanna hit with one, better hurry to get the old paintjob.

consistency wins
07-01-2008, 06:27 PM
One sweet stick--wonder how it plays????

consistency wins
07-01-2008, 06:28 PM
Worst paintjob I have ever seen. Asian faces on a racket? Disgusting.

I think it's one of the best PJ's I have ever seen--but to each their own in that regard....

2nd_Serve
07-01-2008, 06:58 PM
http://d.yimg.com/a/p/sp/getty/b8/fullj.02cca3ac74568e0ac0160ac41f7d4c3d/02cca3ac74568e0ac0160ac41f7d4c3d-getty-tennis-gbr-wimbledon.jpg

http://d.yimg.com/a/p/sp/getty/fc/fullj.0b56a0b68f48d1a3f6fd1aaec35e8e59/0b56a0b68f48d1a3f6fd1aaec35e8e59-getty-tennis-gbr-wimbledon.jpg

http://d.yimg.com/a/p/sp/getty/cc/fullj.bb61cf451689427d9696f30367a5df71/bb61cf451689427d9696f30367a5df71-getty-tennis-gbr-wimbledon.jpg

definitely a Fischer.

Well....About the pj...It isn't THAT bad. But I do like the simple a lot more better.

racingdad23
07-01-2008, 07:00 PM
I think it looks nice also. Its time to renew our Techinifibre player package but the new sticks arent available yet. May have to demo them first since the specs between the Tfight 320 are different from the new stick.

WhosYoDatis?
07-03-2008, 01:49 PM
How is that a PJ? Its obviously a Technifibre TFlash 315 its a whole new model so obviously it would be a different head size and shape .

vsbabolat
07-03-2008, 03:32 PM
I sat in the first row behind the baseline, several feet away from where the players return on the ad side, at Baggy's first round flameout at the FO.

I recall that his racquet looked different than the pictures posted in this thread. It looked like a Pure Drive clone, with a very wide constant beam (I estimate about 26mm). It looked to be very light by the way the ball came off his racquet -- he would take big cuts and the ball came off his strings without any sting, as if it were a 10-oz. granny stick.

I'll dig up my camera and see if I can post the pics. In the meantime, if anyone else has pics from that match, please post pics of his racquet to confirm this.

Baghdatis racquet at Roland Garros is the same racquet at Wimbledon. It has been the same racquet through out his career, the Fischer Pro No.1. The Fischer Pro No.1 and the Tecnifibre clone are a tapered beam 20-25mm beam width. The Pro No.1 and the Tecnifibre clone start at 20mm and at the tip becomes 25mm.
http://i173.photobucket.com/albums/w50/vsbabolat/Baghdatis2.jpg
http://i173.photobucket.com/albums/w50/vsbabolat/Baghdatis.jpg

How is that a PJ? Its obviously a Technifibre TFlash 315 its a whole new model so obviously it would be a different head size and shape .
Tecnifibre's new T-Flash 315 is a clone of the Fischer Pro No.1.
http://i173.photobucket.com/albums/w50/vsbabolat/fischervtpro982.jpg
http://www.tecnifibre.com/index1.html?en

f1 tech
07-04-2008, 08:47 AM
Didn't Tecnifibre also used the same mold as the Dunlop Mfil 300 for the Tfight 320?

vsbabolat
07-04-2008, 09:01 AM
Didn't Tecnifibre also used the same mold as the Dunlop Mfil 300 for the Tfight 320?

No, Tecnifibre did not. Tecnifibre used the Dunlop Pro Mold that Haas, Blake, and Berdych use for the Tecnifibre T-Fight 320 and T-Fight 335.

srl
07-04-2008, 09:35 AM
I had a hit with the new range of sticks and thought I'd share my thoughts for anyone who is interested.
First the Flash 315, I had played with the Fischer this was taken from many years ago and it is basically the same. The balance seems slightly more headlight and the grip has the Tecnifibre shape but other than that it is as similar as you will get, I remember a write up in tennis magazine many years ago that described it as 'like a ferrari-you'd better know how to drive if you're going to use it'. That sums it up a players stick that moves through the air quickly with a small sweetspot and good control if you find it, but if you don't it will let you know. Having said that if you're able to handle more heft some lead in the right spots would really develop the way it plays.
The Fight 320,325 and 325xl are the revelations to me. The beam has clearly been widened and the technical sell is that the frame has been firmed up in certain places to increase the balls dwell time on the strings and I have to say that I normally take a lot of technical blurb with a pinch of salt.
The T fight 325 was to me a classic and the 320 and 320xl stiffer in the shaft and hoop, they are good sticks with a big following but I have always felt that the 325 was better.
The new sticks are the nearest I have hit to the old 325's, they have the softer feel but are a bit more powerful, it seems strange that a wider beam would still have that flex and it is slightly stiffer in the shaft but the feel is much more like their previous classic and I feel these will be seen as another great stick from them.
The other racquets in the Flash range are basically the old Flash frames with new paint jobs and similar to pure drives and the other T fights are lighter versions of the Feel 300 but again good sticks.

counter_puncher
07-04-2008, 08:17 PM
wowza! new tecnifibre sticks!

WhosYoDatis?
07-06-2008, 09:23 AM
Yea thats no samuri! its a SUMO!

Babolast
07-07-2008, 01:42 AM
Here is the new 320.
http://i289.photobucket.com/albums/ll228/mugengsr1/320b.jpg

http://i289.photobucket.com/albums/ll228/mugengsr1/320.jpg

So this is Baggys model?

ericsson
07-07-2008, 02:06 AM
So this is Baggys model?

No it's not, he plays the T Flash 315. (PJ)

Babolast
07-07-2008, 02:39 AM
What model was that then?

f1 tech
07-07-2008, 08:25 AM
http://i289.photobucket.com/albums/ll228/mugengsr1/315.jpg

Baggy is using this one.

Babolast
07-07-2008, 09:23 AM
Baggy is using this one.Then why did he say this?

No it's not, he plays the T Flash 315.

nyc
07-07-2008, 09:30 AM
I had a hit with the new range of sticks and thought I'd share my thoughts for anyone who is interested.
First the Flash 315, I had played with the Fischer this was taken from many years ago and it is basically the same. The balance seems slightly more headlight and the grip has the Tecnifibre shape but other than that it is as similar as you will get, I remember a write up in tennis magazine many years ago that described it as 'like a ferrari-you'd better know how to drive if you're going to use it'. That sums it up a players stick that moves through the air quickly with a small sweetspot and good control if you find it, but if you don't it will let you know. Having said that if you're able to handle more heft some lead in the right spots would really develop the way it plays.
The Fight 320,325 and 325xl are the revelations to me. The beam has clearly been widened and the technical sell is that the frame has been firmed up in certain places to increase the balls dwell time on the strings and I have to say that I normally take a lot of technical blurb with a pinch of salt.
The T fight 325 was to me a classic and the 320 and 320xl stiffer in the shaft and hoop, they are good sticks with a big following but I have always felt that the 325 was better.
The new sticks are the nearest I have hit to the old 325's, they have the softer feel but are a bit more powerful, it seems strange that a wider beam would still have that flex and it is slightly stiffer in the shaft but the feel is much more like their previous classic and I feel these will be seen as another great stick from them.
The other racquets in the Flash range are basically the old Flash frames with new paint jobs and similar to pure drives and the other T fights are lighter versions of the Feel 300 but again good sticks.


Thanks for the review - very insightful. I have been a 320 devotee for quite a while now, but always felt that I could do with a tad more power and a slightly more forgiving sweetspot, especially as I get older (and not any faster).

I look forward to take them for a spin when they become available. too bad the PJ is really not to my liking.

jorel
07-07-2008, 09:39 AM
how does TF not get sued by Fish?

nyc
07-07-2008, 10:15 AM
why would they? Fischer's contract with Baggy ended and he's playing under TF now.

If anything, consumers would be able to sue TF for claiming that Baggy's playing with a 315, which he's clearly not.

nyc
07-07-2008, 10:16 AM
It' s like James Blake playing his Dunlop stick the whole time he was with Prince...

A_Fish
07-07-2008, 02:39 PM
I think it is a paintjob too. I am just a bit confused tho. Perhaps the new 315 is a different mold to the old Fischer. On the TF website, it is advertised as a 100 sq. in. head. Isn't the Fischer a 98sq. in. head??? Maybe Baggy is using the 98 Fischer mold, which is painted to look like the NEW TF 315..... Also, what is the stiffness like on the new frame? The old Fischer is flexible, but normally the TFlash models have been stiff.....

srl
07-08-2008, 11:38 AM
Firstly don't get too tied into all this head size stuff. A racquet can be measured inside the frame and its 98 or outside and its 100, or in the case of the fight 97 for the 325 and 98 for the 335 which is now 95. I put my old 325 on top of the new model and could not see any difference in head size and by calling it 100 it gives it more of a new identity.
None of the new models had any flex stated on the decals so I could only compare to how I remember the Fischers playing from many years ago and it seemed about as close as possible but bear in it was strung fairly tight and with Promix. The 325 was definitely less 'boardy' than present models but again no stated flex. The bumper on the Flash 315 is even the same as the old ones-its moulded with the cut outs.

surfordie
07-12-2008, 11:27 PM
Worst paintjob I have ever seen. Asian faces on a racket? Disgusting.

It's quite obvious how you feel about asian faces. Would it be any less disgusting to you if the faces on the racquet weren't "asian"?

It's amazing what people reveal about themselves without intention.

sargeinaz
07-13-2008, 02:08 AM
It's quite obvious how you feel about asian faces. Would it be any less disgusting to you if the faces on the racquet weren't "asian"?

It's amazing what people reveal about themselves without intention.

Cut that BS out. Why are you trying to instigate things and make assumptions about me? I meant to put faces on a racket is stupid looking. They happened to be asian, so I described them as "asian faces". Any type of picture on a racket would be stupid to me. Whether its a face or an animal or a plant or anything else. It could have been any face and I would have said it looked stupid or disgusting. Black, white, asian, hispanic, middle eastern or any other race in the world. By disgusting I meant the look of the paintjob on the racket, not the face itself. Funny how everyone knew what I meant except you. Go try to start problems somewhere else.

By the way, nice second post. Way to make a good first impression on the forum.

fluffy Beaver
07-13-2008, 01:18 PM
Cut that BS out. Why are you trying to instigate things and make assumptions about me? I meant to put faces on a racket is stupid looking. They happened to be asian, so I described them as "asian faces". Any type of picture on a racket would be stupid to me. Whether its a face or an animal or a plant or anything else. It could have been any face and I would have said it looked stupid or disgusting. Black, white, asian, hispanic, middle eastern or any other race in the world. By disgusting I meant the look of the paintjob on the racket, not the face itself. Funny how everyone knew what I meant except you. Go try to start problems somewhere else.

By the way, nice second post. Way to make a good first impression on the forum.

I like how you edited your post so many times to defend yourself and each time you keep adding more races.

Anyways, it wasn't necessary to add the word "asian" in front of faces. I'm sure if anyone said any other race, "ugliest racquet ever, it has a ________ man's face, disgusting" it sounds nothing but racist.

sargeinaz
07-13-2008, 02:47 PM
I like how you edited your post so many times to defend yourself and each time you keep adding more races.

Anyways, it wasn't necessary to add the word "asian" in front of faces. I'm sure if anyone said any other race, "ugliest racquet ever, it has a ________ man's face, disgusting" it sounds nothing but racist.

I edited it twice to clarify what I was saying so sensitive people like yourself wouldn't sit there and fish for something racist out of thin air. Like I said, I used the word asian because that is what the faces are, are they not? Would you prefer I described them as middle eastern faces or hispanic faces when they clearly are not either of those? Grow thicker skin and stop looking for things to cry racism about.

fluffy Beaver
07-13-2008, 03:00 PM
I edited it twice to clarify what I was saying so sensitive people like yourself wouldn't sit there and fish for something racist out of thin air. Like I said, I used the word asian because that is what the faces are, are they not? Would you prefer I described them as middle eastern faces or hispanic faces when they clearly are not either of those? Grow thicker skin and stop looking for things to cry racism about.

wow wow wow wow..... did you not even read my post? I clearly just said it was not necessary to add the word "asian" in front of faces. You could have just said "faces". Again read my post, i said it will sound racist to others no matter what race you put clearly meaning again, just say "faces" with out a race in front of it.

Seeing as how you are getting extremely defensive, my opinion on you and this subject is starting to change. Perhaps your head is too thick to comprehend others sayings?

sargeinaz
07-13-2008, 03:05 PM
wow wow wow wow..... did you not even read my post? I clearly just said it was not necessary to add the word "asian" in front of faces. You could have just said "faces". Again read my post, i said it will sound racist to others no matter what race you put clearly meaning again, just say "faces" with out a race in front of it.

Seeing as how you are getting extremely defensive, my opinion on you and this subject is starting to change. Perhaps your head is too thick to comprehend others sayings?

I suppose I could have not used the word asian. I suppose it was not absolutely necessary to use that word. But I did use it to describe what they are because that is what they are. Was it necessary? No. Was I being racist? Nope. As far as my head being too thick, ya stupid things dont get through to me.

Now I dont feel like continuing this with you because this thread is about new technifibre frames. Feel free to email me if you still feel like talking about this.

LPShanet
07-13-2008, 03:40 PM
I don't know any of you guys, but I thought it worth mentioning that I think there may have been a bit of overreaction here. Since the faces aren't even human (they're masks), it's not racist in any clear way to use the word "Asian" to describe them...it's simply helps understand that he's talking about the Kabuki faces on the frame...which are, in fact, Asian. The least you can do is accept his clarification and apology, which he's already given. After all, if you're talking about a rug that was ugly, no one would call you a racist for saying, "that Turkish rug is ugly", nor would they think that you hated Turkish people.

sargeinaz
07-13-2008, 04:38 PM
^^ Thank you for being logical, I appreciate it.

surfordie
07-14-2008, 10:38 PM
I don't know any of you guys, but I thought it worth mentioning that I think there may have been a bit of overreaction here. Since the faces aren't even human (they're masks), it's not racist in any clear way to use the word "Asian" to describe them...it's simply helps understand that he's talking about the Kabuki faces on the frame...which are, in fact, Asian. The least you can do is accept his clarification and apology, which he's already given. After all, if you're talking about a rug that was ugly, no one would call you a racist for saying, "that Turkish rug is ugly", nor would they think that you hated Turkish people.

I understand your point. However, if you actually say the following statements aloud, you might see how one of them can easily arouse some sour feelings...

Turkish rugs are ugly.
Asian faces are ugly.

Additionally,
I hate Turkish rugs.
I hate Asian faces.

Bottom line: Sarg' expressed himself poorly and accidentally offended a couple people.

LPShanet
07-15-2008, 07:51 AM
I understand your point. However, if you actually say the following statements aloud, you might see how one of them can easily arouse some sour feelings...

Turkish rugs are ugly.
Asian faces are ugly.

Additionally,
I hate Turkish rugs.
I hate Asian faces.

Bottom line: Sarg' expressed himself poorly and accidentally offended a couple people.

Maybe so, but as you can see, the problem in those cases is the use of "faces" instead of "masks", not the use of Asian. (To wit: "I hate Turkish rugs. I hate Asian masks." Not offensive.) They were not pictures of anyone's face. And everyone involved could see the masks in question. So leave the guy alone already.

Fedace
07-15-2008, 08:03 AM
So did baggie really switch to Tech or not ??

vsbabolat
07-15-2008, 08:09 AM
So did baggie really switch to Tech or not ??

No. Even the commercial T-Flash 315 is a clone of the Fischer Pro No. 1/Vacuum Pro 98 mold.

It is like back when Lendl switched from the Kneissl White Star Lendl Pro to the Adidas GTX Pro.

zeusmerlin
10-08-2008, 10:53 PM
Noticed in the specs for this racquet in TW that it has a stiffness of 61, however, on the specification card which attaches to the racquet it says 65.
Which is right?

Cheers

ericsson
10-08-2008, 11:57 PM
Noticed in the specs for this racquet in TW that it has a stiffness of 61, however, on the specification card which attaches to the racquet it says 65.
Which is right?

Cheers

Yea i notice that too, and it's quite strange, if you look online you will see RA from 66 till 69, only TW has a very low 61.

f1 tech
10-09-2008, 08:33 AM
Doesn't TW measure the stiffness after it's strung? If so, the 61 is correct.

crosscourt
10-09-2008, 10:21 AM
No. Even the commercial T-Flash 315 is a clone of the Fischer Pro No. 1/Vacuum Pro 98 mold.

It is like back when Lendl switched from the Kneissl White Star Lendl Pro to the Adidas GTX Pro.

Did the Fischer rackets have the wider head and narrower body beam?

c

hollywood9826
10-09-2008, 10:28 AM
From my demo hit with it. It was 65 for sure. Felt very stiff. I didnt like it at all. Actually the 3 VO2 maxs I demed. Tflash 315, Tfight 320, and Tfight 325XL. I thought they were terrible.

Ill stick to my original 325's with head 4 5/8 grip.

The new TFs disappointed me.

racquetjunkie
10-09-2008, 08:18 PM
Worst paintjob I have ever seen. Asian faces on a racket? Disgusting.


YOU HAVE A PROBLEM WITH ASIAN FACES ON A RACQUET OR ANYTHING ELSE???

Fedace
10-12-2008, 08:08 PM
No. Even the commercial T-Flash 315 is a clone of the Fischer Pro No. 1/Vacuum Pro 98 mold.

It is like back when Lendl switched from the Kneissl White Star Lendl Pro to the Adidas GTX Pro.

if he didn't switch, that has to be the coolest PJ i have ever seen. i want my Yonex painted over like that from the new VO2 line...:)

Tofuspeedstar
10-13-2008, 10:03 PM
So far it's a PJ on his old Fischer. Apparently TF bought the mold from Fischer. TF is introducing a new range of T Flashes, and his frame will be a PJ of one of those (the new T Flash 315).

Yeap, his new Technifibre frame is just his old Fischer with new paint and different company.