SPPP vs CYBERFLASH

[lawlitssoo1n]

I want to know which play better in 16G and i do not plan on using 17G

which one has
MORE SPIN
MORE CONTROL
MORE POWER

[hoodjem]

I want to know which play better in 16G and i do not plan on using 17G

which one has
MORE SPIN
MORE CONTROL
MORE POWER

I'd have to say
MORE SPIN = Definitely Cyberflash
MORE CONTROL = Cyberflash
MORE POWER = toss-up
MORE FEEL = Definitely Cyberflash

[tennisfreak15347]

although you did not ask for it, tension maintenance= SPPP. it was specifically designed for that, and maybe just that.

[lawlitssoo1n]

BOTH strings have pretty high stiffness range, higher than premier ace. and when i used premier ace i had a really hard time with my elbows(but first time using poly) i strung it up at 64 lbs. and i litterally died! i currently use BG/gosen micro at 64/63, so do you think i could use cyberflash or sppp at 64 lbs full?

oh and another questions
what is the benefit of string the crosses higher or lower?

[tennisfreak15347]

for anything besides poly, stringing crosses usually stops string movement, but string movement isn't a factor in polys. I would say one cause for stringing crosses higher or lower would be to alter the stiffness of the stringbend without drastically altering the power of the racquet.

[In)SpiRe]

SPIN- CF
CONTROL- CF
POWER- CF
FEEL- SPPP
TM- SPPP

But I have not tried the 16g for either. This is based on my 17 and 17L experiences, and they were a while ago.

[radical pro joe]

Spin-draw
Control-CF
Power-CF
Feel-SPPP
TM-SPPP

I used to use SPPP but switched to CF because it is so much cheaper. The main difference is that SPPP plays softer and CF is crisper.