PDA

View Full Version : BIG Weekend in Pac-10. Stanford vs USC, UCLA. Webcam live feed.


Fedace
02-26-2009, 06:36 AM
Big weekend coming up in Pac-10. to start off on friday, USC vs Stanford. Stanford has the slight edge here. Look for them avenge their loss from last year. then UCLA vs Stanford on saturday. USC will continue on and play Cal on saturday. Who is your pick this weekend. Here is the link to the Webcam.

http://usctrojans.cstv.com/sports/m-tennis/usc-m-tennis-body.html
http://usctrojans.cstv.com/livestats/tennis/Scoreboard.html

Bash and Crash
02-26-2009, 07:00 AM
cool, sounds like some good tennis, wouldn't USC be the favorite #4 and at home, although Stanford is #5 so not much difference...should be close.

Daycrawler
02-26-2009, 07:03 AM
My boy Matt Brooklyn. Gotta root for UCLA baby.

woodrow1029
02-26-2009, 09:12 AM
Big weekend coming up in Pac-10. to start off on friday, USC vs Stanford. Stanford has the slight edge here. Look for them avenge their loss from last year. then UCLA vs Stanford on saturday. USC will continue on and play Cal on saturday. Who is your pick this weekend. Here is the link to the Webcam.

http://usctrojans.cstv.com/sports/m-tennis/usc-m-tennis-body.html
http://usctrojans.cstv.com/livestats/tennis/Scoreboard.html
Its hard to say Stanford has the edge at USC. Hard to say anyone has the edge playing at USC with the crowd throwing bagels, frozen marshmallows, water balloons on the court. But maybe the point penalties for the crowd behavior will help Stanford this time..

Fedace
02-26-2009, 09:24 AM
Its hard to say Stanford has the edge at USC. Hard to say anyone has the edge playing at USC with the crowd throwing bagels, frozen marshmallows, water balloons on the court. But maybe the point penalties for the crowd behavior will help Stanford this time..

LOL, they really throw bagels ??? Hopefully, Stanford can give them a few, right back....:)

ClarkC
02-26-2009, 04:09 PM
UCLA is struggling badly. Against Baylor last weekend, neither Harel Srugo nor Holden Seguso were able to play. If they don't get healthy ASAP, they are underdogs to Stanford.

The only health concern at USC has been Mateusz Kecki. If he is 100%, USC would have a slight edge over Stanford.

db379
02-27-2009, 12:27 PM
Big weekend coming up in Pac-10. to start off on friday, USC vs Stanford. Stanford has the slight edge here. Look for them avenge their loss from last year. then UCLA vs Stanford on saturday. USC will continue on and play Cal on saturday. Who is your pick this weekend. Here is the link to the Webcam.

http://usctrojans.cstv.com/sports/m-tennis/usc-m-tennis-body.html
http://usctrojans.cstv.com/livestats/tennis/Scoreboard.html

Fedace, is it free to watch the matches?

Fedace
02-27-2009, 01:28 PM
^^^Yes free,, All tied up in doubles.. all comes down to #1 doubles with Wire and Muller vs the top team of USC. all tied 7-7....LETS go Cardinal.....

Fedace
02-27-2009, 01:45 PM
Stanford Wins The Doubles Point. In What Could Have Been The Doubles Match Of The Decade. #1 Team Wire And Muller Wins In A Tiebreaker. Stanford Up 1-0, Now Singles Is Up. Go Stanford...

kctennis1005
02-27-2009, 01:56 PM
Stanford Wins The Doubles Point. In What Could Have Been The Doubles Match Of The Decade. #1 Team Wire And Muller Wins In A Tiebreaker. Stanford Up 1-0, Now Singles Is Up. Go Stanford...

are u sure that was #1 doubles? because usc had magdas/nguyen in that last match so that mite have been #2 or #3 dubs there

Fedace
02-27-2009, 01:59 PM
are u sure that was #1 doubles? because usc had magdas/nguyen in that last match so that mite have been #2 or #3 dubs there

Ok Stanford switched up today. it was actually #2 match. but still it was a NCAA doubles match of this century.... that is for sure..:)

Fedace
02-27-2009, 02:32 PM
Alex down a break in the 1st set. Alex seem to be the dominant player but giving away some points on unforced errors at the moment..

Bash and Crash
02-27-2009, 07:47 PM
well guess ol' fedace was correct Stanford with da victory...4-3

Fedace
02-27-2009, 08:23 PM
Dominating WIN by Stanford. Klahn comes up a Hero in this one.

Feb. 27, 2009 - Los Angeles, Calif.
No. 5 Stanford 4, No. 4 USC 3
Doubles
1) No. 3 Farah/Johnson (USC) d. Brach/Thacher (STAN) 8-4
2) No. 28 Muller/Wire (STAN) d. Magdas/Nguyen (USC) 9-8(4)
3) Klahn/Kelly (STAN) d. Kecki/Poldma (USC) 8-6
Order of Finish: 1, 3, 2
Singles
1) No. 3 Robert Farah (USC) d. No. 13 Alex Clayton (STAN) 6-4, 6-4
2) No. 47 Bradley Klahn (STAN) d. Jaak Poldma (USC) 3-6, 6-2, 7-6(6)
3) No. 118 Steven Johnson (USC) d. Ryan Thacher (STAN) 4-6, 6-3, 7-6(5)
4) Matt Bruch (STAN) d. Matt Kecki (USC) 6-3, 6-3
5) No. 117 Richard Wire (STAN) d. Daniel Nguyen (USC) 6-1, 3-6, 6-2
6) Jason McNaughton (USC) d. Blake Muller (STAN) 6-3, 6-2
Order of Finish: 6, 4, 5, 1, 3, 2

NickC
02-27-2009, 09:53 PM
Dominating WIN by Stanford. Klahn comes up a Hero in this one.

Feb. 27, 2009 - Los Angeles, Calif.
No. 5 Stanford 4, No. 4 USC 3
Doubles
1) No. 3 Farah/Johnson (USC) d. Brach/Thacher (STAN) 8-4
2) No. 28 Muller/Wire (STAN) d. Magdas/Nguyen (USC) 9-8(4)
3) Klahn/Kelly (STAN) d. Kecki/Poldma (USC) 8-6
Order of Finish: 1, 3, 2
Singles
1) No. 3 Robert Farah (USC) d. No. 13 Alex Clayton (STAN) 6-4, 6-4
2) No. 47 Bradley Klahn (STAN) d. Jaak Poldma (USC) 3-6, 6-2, 7-6(6)
3) No. 118 Steven Johnson (USC) d. Ryan Thacher (STAN) 4-6, 6-3, 7-6(5)
4) Matt Bruch (STAN) d. Matt Kecki (USC) 6-3, 6-3
5) No. 117 Richard Wire (STAN) d. Daniel Nguyen (USC) 6-1, 3-6, 6-2
6) Jason McNaughton (USC) d. Blake Muller (STAN) 6-3, 6-2
Order of Finish: 6, 4, 5, 1, 3, 2

Question. How, exactly, is it domination, if "Standford" only won by one match, which was won in a third-set tiebreaker? For me, 7-0 or 6-1 is domination, while 4-3 is the closest the score can possibly be. Care to explain your (lack of) logic?

ClarkC
02-28-2009, 07:04 AM
Dominating WIN by Stanford. Klahn comes up a Hero in this one.

Feb. 27, 2009 - Los Angeles, Calif.
No. 5 Stanford 4, No. 4 USC 3
Doubles
1) No. 3 Farah/Johnson (USC) d. Brach/Thacher (STAN) 8-4
2) No. 28 Muller/Wire (STAN) d. Magdas/Nguyen (USC) 9-8(4)
3) Klahn/Kelly (STAN) d. Kecki/Poldma (USC) 8-6
Order of Finish: 1, 3, 2
Singles
1) No. 3 Robert Farah (USC) d. No. 13 Alex Clayton (STAN) 6-4, 6-4
2) No. 47 Bradley Klahn (STAN) d. Jaak Poldma (USC) 3-6, 6-2, 7-6(6)
3) No. 118 Steven Johnson (USC) d. Ryan Thacher (STAN) 4-6, 6-3, 7-6(5)
4) Matt Bruch (STAN) d. Matt Kecki (USC) 6-3, 6-3
5) No. 117 Richard Wire (STAN) d. Daniel Nguyen (USC) 6-1, 3-6, 6-2
6) Jason McNaughton (USC) d. Blake Muller (STAN) 6-3, 6-2
Order of Finish: 6, 4, 5, 1, 3, 2

Not exactly dominating. I think the absence of Abdullah Magdas in singles for USC (he would usually be #4) had a big effect on the bottom half of the lineup.

UCLA is in even worse shape than USC as far as health goes. Stanford should win that one handily. The interesting matches will be later in the year at Palo Alto if USC and UCLA come in 100% healthy.

roddick_rulz
02-28-2009, 10:45 AM
I'm interested in watching the USC VS. Cal matches.
Do they usually play singles or doubles first?

db379
02-28-2009, 11:15 AM
Very good win for Stanford against USC. Nice to see them back in shape.


Fedace, where can you watch the match against ucla? I cannot seem to find a free live cast on the net...

db379
02-28-2009, 12:24 PM
Anyone? where do you watch the matches?

ClarkC
02-28-2009, 01:23 PM
I'm interested in watching the USC VS. Cal matches.
Do they usually play singles or doubles first?

Doubles first.

Fedace
02-28-2009, 03:13 PM
Anyone? where do you watch the matches?

Sorry, UCLA has no webcam, only live scoreboard. NOW, ALL tied up at 3-3. now it is up to Matt Bruch. they are in third set. Matt against Holden Seguso. Holden has a way of Choking in the 3rd set. Lets hope it holds true here as well. here is the link.

http://uclabruins.cstv.com/sports/m-tennis/ucla-m-tennis-scoreboard.html

Fedace
02-28-2009, 04:39 PM
EPIC WIN over UCLA. Another Hero emerges from the ashes of UCLA tennis stadium. His name is Matt Bruch. This does it. Now Stanford is definitely the favorite to win the NCAA in May.

ClarkC
02-28-2009, 04:42 PM
Well, Bruch beat Seguso in a 3rd set tiebreaker. With Seguso coming off injury and not playing much, and Harel Srugo out of the singles lineup entirely, I am surprised the match was only 4-3 Stanford. If UCLA gets healthy they will be the best in the Pac 10.

Fedace
02-28-2009, 04:45 PM
^^Now that Stanford has improved their doubles, They are practically unbeatable. I can't see anyone beating them for the rest of the season.

ClarkC
02-28-2009, 05:00 PM
EPIC WIN over UCLA. Another Hero emerges from the ashes of UCLA tennis stadium. His name is Matt Bruch. This does it. Now Stanford is definitely the favorite to win the NCAA in May.

A good win, but the rest of the field (Stanford included) has to hope that UCLA is not healthy in May.

Not sure how a 4-3 win over UCLA makes Stanford the favorite over Virginia and Ohio State, who both beat UCLA at the indoors.

socaltennnis
02-28-2009, 05:02 PM
bruch hooks; their umpire can't call lines.

Fedace
02-28-2009, 05:05 PM
bruch hooks; their umpire can't call lines.

How do you know ?? were you there ?:confused:

Fedace
02-28-2009, 05:06 PM
A good win, but the rest of the field (Stanford included) has to hope that UCLA is not healthy in May.

Not sure how a 4-3 win over UCLA makes Stanford the favorite over Virginia and Ohio State, who both beat UCLA at the indoors.

UCLA just didn't look like they were into it at ITA indoors. It was little strange. maybe a Jetlag ??

socaltennnis
02-28-2009, 05:14 PM
How do you know ?? were you there ?:confused:

yes, and srugo still managed to win his doubles set with a cast on his non dominant wrist. good playing by both teams too.

Fedace
02-28-2009, 05:20 PM
yes, and srugo still managed to win his doubles set with a cast on his non dominant wrist. good playing by both teams too.

When did Matt hook Seguso ? In the Tiebreaker ? At that stage of the match, guys want to win so bad, they start seeing things. It is Umpire's job to overrule any obvious bad calls. If it is extremely close call, then you take it for what it is worth.

socaltennnis
02-28-2009, 05:27 PM
i started watching seguso's court around the 2nd set. I saw multiple complaints by seguso to the umpire about bruch's calls. on 3 of the bad calls i was actually there for, only 1 was overruled by the umpire. On all three, i was certain they were in. no complaints on calls during either tiebreaker.

Fedace
02-28-2009, 05:37 PM
i started watching seguso's court around the 2nd set. I saw multiple complaints by seguso to the umpire about bruch's calls. on 3 of the bad calls i was actually there for, only 1 was overruled by the umpire. On all three, i was certain they were in. no complaints on calls during either tiebreaker.

Unfortunately, Matt Bruch has been accused of hooking a few calls here and there during his career. but then this is common place in College tennis. They have Umpires to limit this kind of poor sportsmanship but it still does take place.

DNShade
02-28-2009, 08:44 PM
socaltennnis

Just wanted to say hi to fellow SoCal tennis folk. I was at UCLA today as well - so was Sam Querry just for the folks that might be interested.

So where do you live? You play I take it. Always looking for good people to hit with.

D

NickC
02-28-2009, 08:49 PM
^^Now that Stanford has improved their doubles, They are practically unbeatable. I can't see anyone beating them for the rest of the season.

Switch the places of the word "them" and "anyone" and your post will be correct. Unfortunately, as it is now, it's a fallacy. It should read:

I can't see them beating anyone for the rest of the season.

Unfortunately, Matt Bruch has been accused of hooking a few calls here and there during his career. but then this is common place in College tennis. They have Umpires to limit this kind of poor sportsmanship but it still does take place.

Don't make excuses. You weren't there, this guy was. This guy saw your favorite player cheat, end of story. You can say it's commonplace or what not, but it's clear that Bruch cheated, and won while cheating. When Bruch won, "Standford" won because the team had enough wins to clinch the final point. If Bruch had lost, "Standford" would have lost. Just goes to show that your boy is a cheater and isn't the god you act like he is.

DNShade
02-28-2009, 09:04 PM
Just for the record - the level of play all around from both schools was not all that great. No one was playing like a "god" on any of those courts - and yes, there were some questionable calls.

Fedace
03-01-2009, 06:02 AM
Just for the record - the level of play all around from both schools was not all that great. No one was playing like a "god" on any of those courts - and yes, there were some questionable calls.

This is college tennis afterall. Alex Clayton back on winning track after dropping his match against USC #1. Alex seem to be the better player against all opponent he played so far. He just can't keep his concentration level up for the duration of the match. He will go on this mental holiday in the middle of 1st set or beginning of 2nd set and make 5-6 silly errors in a row and just hands the match over at times. This has to stop if he is to win the NCAA crown as he is expected to do.

Joeyg
03-01-2009, 06:21 AM
"As he is expected to"?????? By whom?

ihearit1st
03-01-2009, 07:54 AM
"As he is expected to"?????? By whom?

Only by him. FedAce thinks Clayton, Thacher, Klahn and Bruch will place 1-4 at the NCAAs if they play their best. Their wins this weekend were impressive, but not enough to make them favorites for anything. There are plenty of other teams doing just as well or better.

My favorite comments are when Stanford wins a nailbitter, 4-3, and he claims domination, thrashing, or the like. The better choice would be, they barely got by.

There's another Top 10 matchup today, Baylor vs. Ohio State(my 2 favorite teams!) Baylor is riding the recent victory over #9 Ole Miss, but I predict OSU at 5-2. OSU is on a 79-match home win streak at the moment. Live stats will be on OSU's site.

Fedace
03-01-2009, 08:24 AM
^^I really hope one day in the future, Ohio state will get a Webcam on their tennis court. They have many talented players and they are fun to watch. I am also Impressed by Northwestern men's team this year. I know they are not in the class of OSU but the improvements they made this year over last year is Impressive.. they only lose 1 match this year, i believe.

NickC
03-01-2009, 10:41 AM
This has to stop if he is to win the NCAA crown as he is expected to do.

Alex isn't expected to do anything. He's not #1. Or #2, or #3. He's the fourth highest pick to win it all, not the top. There are players that are much better than he is, and he shouldn't be expected to do anything outside of lose, lose, and lose some more.

"As he is expected to"?????? By whom?

By a delusional idiot who lacks common sense and a brain.

JackSkellington
03-01-2009, 11:07 AM
When did Matt hook Seguso ? In the Tiebreaker ? At that stage of the match, guys want to win so bad, they start seeing things. It is Umpire's job to overrule any obvious bad calls. If it is extremely close call, then you take it for what it is worth.

Those calls weren't that close, Seguso was definitely hooked about 3 times in the course of that match but by the ref

Fedace
03-01-2009, 11:52 AM
Those calls weren't that close, Seguso was definitely hooked about 3 times in the course of that match but by the ref

I can't believe a ref would be biased toward Stanford in UCLA home courts.

JackSkellington
03-01-2009, 02:27 PM
I can't believe a ref would be biased toward Stanford in UCLA home courts.

Are you talking about fan repercussion? The guy was jeered three times, I don't think he cared. I'm not saying he was biased, but three overrules in favor of Stanford on pretty clear shots, I'm curious as to whether he was watching the ball or not.

Fedace
03-01-2009, 02:33 PM
Are you talking about fan repercussion? The guy was jeered three times, I don't think he cared. I'm not saying he was biased, but three overrules in favor of Stanford on pretty clear shots, I'm curious as to whether he was watching the ball or not.

Maybe he had a history with Holden Seguso. Holden doesn't exactly have the best reputation with umpires. He is very firey, and can explode with temper. Breaking rackets, Cursing and what have you. That doesn't exactly help you earn brownie points with Umps.

socaltennnis
03-01-2009, 03:32 PM
Maybe he had a history with Holden Seguso. Holden doesn't exactly have the best reputation with umpires. He is very firey, and can explode with temper. Breaking rackets, Cursing and what have you. That doesn't exactly help you earn brownie points with Umps.

that's not holden's style of temper... anyways, we are not sure if the umpire was biased but he definitely wasn't overrulling mood. let's just leave it at that. ucla will play stanford in march and the match will be even tighter because ucla should be healthy by then.

ihearit1st
03-01-2009, 04:13 PM
Nice 7-0 win for OSU over #10 Baylor. Extends their home win streak to 80.

NickC
03-02-2009, 09:13 AM
Nice 7-0 win for OSU over #10 Baylor. Extends their home win streak to 80.

That's domination. 4-3 against a team ranked with a one spot difference in rankings isn't domination, especially if the final match was won in a third set breaker.

strahan918
03-02-2009, 09:17 PM
If you guys want a link to the videos, there are some high definition videos of USC against Stanford taken by some guy in attendance.

http://www.youtube.com/user/Maximagq

Fedace
03-03-2009, 09:51 AM
If you guys want a link to the videos, there are some high definition videos of USC against Stanford taken by some guy in attendance.

http://www.youtube.com/user/Maximagq

guy is a stanford fan, sounds like..

Fedace
03-03-2009, 10:04 AM
If you guys want a link to the videos, there are some high definition videos of USC against Stanford taken by some guy in attendance.

http://www.youtube.com/user/Maximagq

it doesn't really look like High def to me..

socaltennnis
03-03-2009, 10:27 AM
it doesn't really look like High def to me..

theres a button called "view in HD" on the bottom right corner of the video. click it and u will redirect u to the large widescreen version.

Fedace
03-03-2009, 11:26 AM
theres a button called "view in HD" on the bottom right corner of the video. click it and u will redirect u to the large widescreen version.

Thank you. Now i can see coach Whit's face break out in JOY. :)

Fedace
03-03-2009, 12:44 PM
Do you guys know how to download this HD video ?? thanks.

db379
03-03-2009, 01:43 PM
use keepvids

Fedace
03-03-2009, 03:28 PM
use keepvids

I think you have to pay for it. it saids $39.95

Fedace
03-04-2009, 04:00 PM
NOW up, UCLA vs Stanford. now you can watch Stanford dominate UCLA.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AkZcsJGxJaY

NickC
03-04-2009, 04:39 PM
NOW up, UCLA vs Stanford. now you can watch Stanford dominate UCLA.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AkZcsJGxJaY

Because nothing says "domination" like a 4-3 win that was decided by a match won in a 3rd set breaker.

SoCal10s
03-04-2009, 07:29 PM
Alex down a break in the 1st set. Alex seem to be the dominant player but giving away some points on unforced errors at the moment..

who's leaving Stanford next year? I see Dennis Lin is coming to the team, I'll be a Stanford fan for sure with Thacher,Bradley Klahn,and Dennis Lin all from SoCal.. I love watching Thacher and Lin play, Lin really hits the crap out of the ball.. and Thacher is the cool surfer dude,with great timing coming to the net...

woodrow1029
03-04-2009, 08:05 PM
who's leaving Stanford next year? I see Dennis Lin is coming to the team, I'll be a Stanford fan for sure with Thacher,Bradley Klahn,and Dennis Lin all from SoCal.. I love watching Thacher and Lin play, Lin really hits the crap out of the ball.. and Thacher is the cool surfer dude,with great timing coming to the net...
Bruch and Muller are seniors.

Fedace
03-05-2009, 03:30 AM
who's leaving Stanford next year? I see Dennis Lin is coming to the team, I'll be a Stanford fan for sure with Thacher,Bradley Klahn,and Dennis Lin all from SoCal.. I love watching Thacher and Lin play, Lin really hits the crap out of the ball.. and Thacher is the cool surfer dude,with great timing coming to the net...

Thacher is very talented. He has to stay injury free if he is to continue on to next level. I don't know too much about Lin. Has he done well at the Junior slams ?

Fedace
03-05-2009, 03:31 AM
Bruch and Muller are seniors.

Yea Whateverrrrrr..... Jeff Zeller is also Seniorsssssssssss. LOL..:)

woodrow1029
03-05-2009, 07:11 AM
Yea Whateverrrrrr..... Jeff Zeller is also Seniorsssssssssss. LOL..:)
So, by saying "yea whateverrrrr," are you saying that I was incorrect that Bruch and Muller are seniorsssssssssssssss?

SoCal10s
03-05-2009, 07:41 AM
So, by saying "yea whateverrrrr," are you saying that I was incorrect that Bruch and Muller are seniorsssssssssssssss?

I think he's jealous that you answered the question about his loved ones... what do you think of Dennis Lin ?

Daycrawler
03-05-2009, 07:54 AM
Yeah. Talking to my boy Matt he says UCLA has some injuries but they'll come back and get them when it counts.

Fedace
03-05-2009, 08:25 AM
I think he's jealous that you answered the question about his loved ones... what do you think of Dennis Lin ?

Do you have any Video of Dennis Lin playing ? He hits Hard. but lots of guys hit hard at that level. Is he in the league of Alex Clayton power ?

woodrow1029
03-05-2009, 08:26 AM
I think he's jealous that you answered the question about his loved ones... what do you think of Dennis Lin ?
I don't know Dennis Lin. I haven't seen him play.

Joeyg
03-05-2009, 08:30 AM
Be careful with your posts, about Dr. Fedace, Woodrow. The mods seemto be a bit protective about any criticism of him.

SoCal10s
03-05-2009, 08:36 AM
Do you have any Video of Dennis Lin playing ? He hits Hard. but lots of guys hit hard at that level. Is he in the league of Alex Clayton power ?

no I've seen him play but i don't do VDO stuff.. he's very solid both sides,big serves for a medium height(5'9-5'10")guy.. I've haven't seen Clayton play except on youtube so I can't really say,but Lin has more impressive groundstrokes (IMO)than any non-pro I've seen.. he hits a line drive every ball and is very strong physically .. this kid looks like he's doing kung fu when he plays.. very efficient ... he'll be playing at the Jack Kramer club this weekend,go watch.. Woody Hunt B18s .. tournament ..

woodrow1029
03-05-2009, 08:40 AM
Be careful with your posts, about Dr. Fedace, Woodrow. The mods seemto be a bit protective about any criticism of him.
So Ive noticed. LOL. I don't understand why though. You would think that pointing out grammatical errors and lack of logic to a StanDford grad would be a good thing.

Fedace
03-05-2009, 08:47 AM
no I've seen him play but i don't do VDO stuff.. he's very solid both sides,big serves for a medium height(5'9-5'10")guy.. I've haven't seen Clayton play except on youtube so I can't really say,but Lin has more impressive groundstrokes (IMO)than any non-pro I've seen.. he hits a line drive every ball and is very strong physically .. this kid looks like he's doing kung fu when he plays.. very efficient ... he'll be playing at the Jack Kramer club this weekend,go watch.. Woody Hunt B18s .. tournament ..

Video of Dennis and Marcos after a doubles win last year.

http://www.vimeo.com/1061312

Fedace
03-05-2009, 09:02 AM
I think he's jealous that you answered the question about his loved ones... what do you think of Dennis Lin ?

Socal, your boy Dennis is playing in Pacific coast doubles event tomorrow. They could square off against Stanford guys if they advance.

http://tennislink.usta.com/Tournaments/Draws/EventDraw.aspx?T=67176&E=1

SoCal10s
03-05-2009, 10:13 AM
Socal, your boy Dennis is playing in Pacific coast doubles event tomorrow. They could square off against Stanford guys if they advance.

http://tennislink.usta.com/Tournaments/Draws/EventDraw.aspx?T=67176&E=1


Fedace: what are you talking about ? Dennis Lin? I didn't see his name in that doubles tournament.. both Marcos and Dennis Lin are in the Woody Hunt Jr. tournament this coming weekend... Is Chris Surapol pro yet? just poking you man...

socaltennnis
03-05-2009, 02:43 PM
surapol is going to graduate school and hes the assistant coach for UCLA tennis as of earlier this season. he's playing in the pac coast doubles with the other asst coach. he was never going pro as fedace made it sound like...

strahan918
03-05-2009, 08:56 PM
Fedace..know any reason why Klahn is #2 singles while Thacher is at 3? seems to me like thacher has a better overall game than klahn.

SoCal10s
03-05-2009, 09:15 PM
Fedace..know any reason why Klahn is #2 singles while Thacher is at 3? seems to me like thacher has a better overall game than klahn.


Thacher has been hurt for a long time.. maybe he's not 100% yet.. he's struggling to get wins show that he may be a bit rusty..

Fedace
03-05-2009, 09:22 PM
Fedace..know any reason why Klahn is #2 singles while Thacher is at 3? seems to me like thacher has a better overall game than klahn.

SoCal is right. Thacher is coming off injury and hasn't played all that much during the fall. While Klahn has proven himself at #2 singles position. He had a Big win at USC that clinched the team win for Stanford. So, unless Klahn keeps blowing it at #2, and Thacher starts to blow away his opponents at #3, this order won't change.

strahan918
03-06-2009, 06:18 PM
Ok, thanks socal and fedace.