PDA

View Full Version : wimbeldon draw always favour federer


satishnadal
06-21-2009, 02:46 AM
they want him to win his 15th in wimby . when murray was 4th ranked nadal played him in semis now he is in 3rd still he plays nadal in semis. morever federer get only one or two tough matches onthe contray for nadal it is 5 or 6 that is clearly favouring one player if they wish let them give the title to federer why have an open tournament. its truly discriminating by the britishers.

jamesblakefan#1
06-21-2009, 02:48 AM
Who is this Nadal you speak of...I don't see him in my draw anymore. :confused:

Ratsoup
06-21-2009, 02:51 AM
Well, Mr. wise guy, apparently Nadal isn't playing the turnament, so how can he play Murray in the samis? Ohh, no, don't say it's an British conspiracy that Nadals both knees are injured.

zagor
06-21-2009, 03:28 AM
they want him to win his 15th in wimby . when murray was 4th ranked nadal played him in semis now he is in 3rd still he plays nadal in semis. morever federer get only one or two tough matches onthe contray for nadal it is 5 or 6 that is clearly favouring one player if they wish let them give the title to federer why have an open tournament. its truly discriminating by the britishers.

No he doesn't.

joeri888
06-21-2009, 03:33 AM
Nadal had Murray as well at RG, where the general consensus was that that would be an advantage. Nadal is out anyway, so what are you really bothered with? Murray was a total nobody last year and having Djokovic on his side was a clear disadvantage for Federer people tought back then.

malakas
06-21-2009, 03:37 AM
these britishers are evilllll!!:evil: :evil: :evil:

Sentinel
06-21-2009, 03:48 AM
satish, where in India are you ???

I was given to understand that the draws are made in front of a large number of people and you cannot fix it.

Its really tragic, even the weather gods are favoring Federer, for crying out loud!!!

tintin
06-21-2009, 03:53 AM
go crawl back in your hole idiot
for the record check back on the 2006 draw filled with great grass court players and then like I said go CRAWL in your hole and stay there:rolleyes:

makinao
06-21-2009, 06:27 AM
Before Nadal (1) pulled out and the draw was reshuffled, the only top ten seeds in his quarter was Roddick (6). Murray's (3) quarter had Simon (8), and Gonzalez (10). Djokovic's (4) quarter had Del Potro (5). Fed (2) actually had two top-ten seeds in his quarter, Verdasco (7) and Tsonga (9).

After the revisions, the top-10 seeded players in the top quarter are DelPotro (5), and Roddick (6). Murray's (3) quarter still has Simon (8) and Gonzalez (10). Djokovic's quarter now doesn't have anyone seeded higher than 11 (Cilic). Fed's quarter still has Verdasco (7), Tsonga (9).

So whose quarter had/has more top-10 seeds? Federer and Murray. Who of these two has higher ranking seeds in his quarter? Federer. Is that what you call a draw that favors Federer?

Jimmyk459
06-21-2009, 06:33 AM
its good for both of them. With nadal out, they much rather see murray iin the finals against federer than against him in the semis.

skip1969
06-21-2009, 06:40 AM
ahhhhh . . . the old "fed always gets the favorable draws in the slams and it's soooo not fair cos nadal is a wonderfully humble guy and they should let him wins some slams too" thread.

clever.

P_Agony
06-21-2009, 07:07 AM
People have such short memories.

Just a year ago, when Murray was not who he is today and Djokovic was astrong #3, many Nadal fans were crying about how Nadal always gets Djokovic in his half. The word 'conspiracy' was actually written here many times. Guess what REALLY happenned: Fed got Djokovic in his half for 6 out of the last 7 slams (!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!) yet no Federer fan cried conspiracy.

Now that Djokovic is arguably not as good as he was last year and is also #4 rather than #3, the argument about a conspiracy remained the same only with the word Djokovic being replaced with the word Murray.

Sigh....

TonyB
06-21-2009, 07:10 AM
Another absolutely worthless thread.

There should be a screening process for this message forum when you sign up so morons like the OP wouldn't even be here.

tudwell
06-21-2009, 07:32 AM
Before Nadal (1) pulled out and the draw was reshuffled, the only top ten seeds in his quarter was Roddick (6). Murray's (3) quarter had Simon (8), and Gonzalez (10). Djokovic's (4) quarter had Del Potro (5). Fed (2) actually had two top-ten seeds in his quarter, Verdasco (7) and Tsonga (9).

After the revisions, the top-10 seeded players in the top quarter are DelPotro (5), and Roddick (6). Murray's (3) quarter still has Simon (8) and Gonzalez (10). Djokovic's quarter now doesn't have anyone seeded higher than 11 (Cilic). Fed's quarter still has Verdasco (7), Tsonga (9).

So whose quarter had/has more top-10 seeds? Federer and Murray. Who of these two has higher ranking seeds in his quarter? Federer. Is that what you call a draw that favors Federer?
Pathetic. These Wimbledon organizers really want to see Djokovic win, going as far as to remove seeds that once were in his draw. How much more obvious can they get??