PDA

View Full Version : The Tennis Lottery


bertrevert
03-24-2005, 02:06 AM
Tennis, the professional variety, is surely held out as that great lottery in the sky.

The players who make it up there are indeed just normal, hitting balls, nothing more.

But the money at the top is so out of proportion to what it is that they do and what it is that it means in the world, that it is surely represents the great giddy lottery in the sky.

Exciting, physical, gladiatorial, tennis is the modern-day agon - agonist versus agonist, it’s a battle. Tennis is this match of opponents. But beyond what goes on court let’s be honest tennis is - bankrolled. Tennis survives off the cream of sponsors, some surplus profit that can be assigned in an advertising way to these contests. That’s great. But to get an idea what that means we only have to go past the top ten, and then there’s not much for the (so-called) no-ones.

At any one moment it is far better for thousands of hopefuls to keep hitting balls with the view that their moment might come. All I can imagine is that that doesn’t happen usually. It must be real tough.

I’d better add that in no way have I experienced the tour. All I can say is that it must be full of hopefuls and that sometimes that tennis schedule must seem like a great big tennis wheel-of-fortune in the sky.

Geezer Guy
03-24-2005, 08:40 AM
I'd agree, but say that's the way it is in ALL of the "entertainment" industry. Pro athletes from ALL sports, as well as TV personalities, Movie Stars, agents, etc all make TONS of money when compared to the average farmer or factory worker.

It's all based on Supply and Demand. If there wasn't a demand (whether "real" or "hype"), the supply would dry up.

However, I disagree that those outside the top 10 don't rake in the bucks. The earnings of players are posted on ATPTOUR.com. Top guy (Federer) made 15 million (lifetime), 25th guy (Coria) made 4 million lifetime, 50th guy (Volandri) made almost a million, 100th guy (Gimelstob) made 2 million lifetime. Now, there are a LOT of younger guys sprinkled in the top 100 that have not made their fortune yet, so those figures above ARE kinda skewed. However, my point is that there's a lot of money out there, and it's spread much deeper than just the top 100.

bertrevert
03-27-2005, 07:43 PM
Okay it's an entertainment industry after all and I shouldn't get too carried away with it's pay rates - I guess I was only thinking about the money on offer at comepetitions, when in fact, as you rightly point out there's more money in sponsorships and if you are on the tour you really can make a living out of it. However, although we see what they earn in those totals it doesn't tell us what they spent (airfares and so on) to earn it.

They do do well out of it. I always respected Agassi laughing at Kafelnikov's statement that professionals weren't paid enough. He needs his head read.