PDA

View Full Version : how is this true.


samprasvsfederer123
06-24-2009, 06:47 PM
i just saw a quote form someone saying federers only rival in his prime was time

how is that possible if he had the best 4 years in tennis history, and by the time hes out wont go out with less than 18?

Grass_for_cows
06-24-2009, 06:50 PM
i just saw a quote form someone saying federers only rival in his prime was time

how is that possible if he had the best 4 years in tennis history, and by the time hes out wont go out with less than 18?

It's not true. People say stuff. It's okay.

Conquistador
06-24-2009, 06:55 PM
i just saw a quote form someone saying federers only rival in his prime was timehow is that possible if he had the best 4 years in tennis history, and by the time hes out wont go out with less than 18?

I guess whenever you have beaten everyone. Whenever you have beaten the world over and over and over and over, human obstacles are nothing to Federer. Federer's only competition in his career has been Nadal. If there were no Nadal, you would see Federer out there playing with a 60 square inch wooden racquet because he would be soo bored playing people. Hes that good and that dangerous.

angharad
06-24-2009, 07:00 PM
i just saw a quote form someone saying federers only rival in his prime was time

how is that possible if he had the best 4 years in tennis history, and by the time hes out wont go out with less than 18?

I've seen a quote on here similar to that, but it said that Federer's only rival was history.

asafi2
06-24-2009, 07:21 PM
I believe that is tudwell's quote.

egn
06-24-2009, 07:21 PM
*points to his sig*

samprasvsfederer123
06-24-2009, 07:22 PM
ya my bad sry history, how does that make sense

egn
06-24-2009, 07:24 PM
it made sense prior to him having a career slam >.> but now that he has it..yea lazy to update..but he never did get that calendar slam...in the past it made sense.