PDA

View Full Version : Which feat was more dominating?


FedFan_2009
08-05-2009, 11:43 AM
Borg's 3 consecutive Channel Slams

or

Federer's 10 straight grand slam finals(8-2).

Cesc Fabregas
08-05-2009, 11:48 AM
Borg because he played in a much tougher era.

GasquetGOAT
08-05-2009, 11:55 AM
Borg because he played in a much tougher era.

You mean he wasn't as dominating because he wasn't as good as Federer.

Federer's era is much stronger with guys like clay-GOAT Nadal, Murray, Djokovic, Roddick, Safin, Hewitt, all of which could win multiple slams in Borg's era.

VivalaVida
08-05-2009, 11:56 AM
Federer's by far.

FedFan_2009
08-05-2009, 11:59 AM
Of course I expect 100% of ******-***** to vote for Borg.

GameSampras
08-05-2009, 11:59 AM
Winning Wimbeldon and the French that many years when they were the polar opposites is not an easy feat.


And you know my thoughts on the current crop of stuperstars.

Fed's achievement is impressive, but was most impressive is how no one can step up at the slams outside of one other player. Thats more or less mind boggling

Cesc Fabregas
08-05-2009, 12:06 PM
Borg beat the likes of Mac, Connors and Vilas in those slams.

drwood
08-05-2009, 12:07 PM
Borg beat the likes of Mac, Connors and Vilas in those slams.

And Roscoe Tanner, who wouldn't be top-20 today.

Ok, maybe a little harsh -- but certainly not top-10.

FedFan_2009
08-05-2009, 12:08 PM
Can we all agree that they're equal feats?

GameSampras
08-05-2009, 12:11 PM
Can we all agree that they're equal feats?

NO!!! LOL...

Yea they're pretty equal.. Very impressive in their own ways :)

Steve132
08-05-2009, 01:43 PM
Voted for Federer's final streak. That requires remarkable consistency and excellence on all surfaces.

Federer now has a streak of 16 out of 17 major finals made. His current streak of 6 is the second highest of the Open era.

E36BMWM3
08-05-2009, 01:44 PM
Of course I expect 100% of ******-***** to vote for Borg.

Get over it you idiot

CocaCola
08-05-2009, 02:58 PM
Federer's streak.

P_Agony
08-05-2009, 03:08 PM
Federer of course.

FedFan_2009
08-05-2009, 03:43 PM
Yup and it's virtually unanimous, Federer's streak. Which means that he's better then Borg and GOAT.

ag200boy
08-05-2009, 03:47 PM
Yup and it's virtually unanimous, Federer's streak. Which means that he's better then Borg and GOAT.

19-9 unanimous?

E36BMWM3
08-06-2009, 05:40 AM
Yup and it's virtually unanimous, Federer's streak. Which means that he's better then Borg and GOAT.

I can't begin to tell you the many ways in which Federer is NOT the greatest of all time.

mandy01
08-06-2009, 05:58 AM
Winning French and Wimbledon back to back was extremely difficult in those days.The surfaces were polar opposites the technology wasnt advanced.
That said I think they're both equally impressive.