PDA

View Full Version : The NTRP levels of College Tennis Teams


Igrac
09-09-2009, 10:35 AM
I was wondering what the average NTRP is for the players in D1 schools as well as some JC's

Does anyone know what NTRP level you wold need to be to play on a Junior College Team. i.e. Glendale Community College

also what NTRP are the players in the California teams like

USC, UCLA and UC Berkeley?

10isDad
09-09-2009, 12:45 PM
Not trying to be rude, but if you use the Search tool, you'll find this topic discussed ad nauseum.

The bottom line: there probably isn't a figure. D1 schools run the gamut from the elite to schools that are probably so weak that some SoCal high school teams would be competitive with them. The same goes for each division.

papatenis
09-09-2009, 04:15 PM
I was wondering what the average NTRP is for the players in D1 schools as well as some JC's
Does anyone know what NTRP level you wold need to be to play on a Junior College Team. i.e. Glendale Community College
also what NTRP are the players in the California teams like
USC, UCLA and UC Berkeley?

I'm from L.A./socal, I think guys that play on jc and cal states are in the range of 4.5 and up, while guys in the PAC-10 mostly play at the highest level on the NTRP.

tennismom42
09-09-2009, 06:02 PM
I was wondering what the average NTRP is for the players in D1 schools as well as some JC's

Does anyone know what NTRP level you wold need to be to play on a Junior College Team. i.e. Glendale Community College

also what NTRP are the players in the California teams like

USC, UCLA and UC Berkeley?Since my son is still a junior, he's never had an NTRP. Nonetheless, I think I've seen enough to give an estimate (for whatever it's worth). I'd say he's a 6.0; lowest on his college team would be 5.5. He's a freshman at D1 midmajor.

Keep in mind that there's a wide spread. I've seen some college players at some D1 schools that are maybe as low as 4.5. The key tennis states (CA, FL, TX, GA) are going to have a lot more high-rated juniors becoming college players in those same states.

So, don't bank too much on the NTRP.

tennismom42
09-09-2009, 06:03 PM
Not trying to be rude, but if you use the Search tool, you'll find this topic discussed ad nauseum.

The bottom line: there probably isn't a figure. D1 schools run the gamut from the elite to schools that are probably so weak that some SoCal high school teams would be competitive with them. The same goes for each division.

"ad nauseum" LOL. I hope they add that to Webster's Dictionary.

ttbrowne
09-10-2009, 05:13 AM
"ad nauseum" LOL. I hope they add that to Webster's Dictionary.

"ad nauseum" is what I have when a dinker is beating me at match point.

Nellie
09-10-2009, 11:33 AM
You can look up the bios of the top players at Stanford, USC, and UCLA (I never tried for Berkeley). These players are semi-pros, often with international experience and ATP points.

ttbrowne
09-10-2009, 06:49 PM
You can look up the bios of the top players at Stanford, USC, and UCLA (I never tried for Berkeley). These players are semi-pros, often with international experience and ATP points.

Yes, I posted a thread about the University of Oklahoma getting a player ranked around 907 on the ATP rankings. So I'm guessing he would be around a 7.0.

goran_ace
09-11-2009, 06:28 AM
NTRP's are irrelevant. Take a look at the bios on the team roster and look at what their rankings and achievements were as a junior.

Fedace
09-11-2009, 06:41 AM
I was wondering what the average NTRP is for the players in D1 schools as well as some JC's

Does anyone know what NTRP level you wold need to be to play on a Junior College Team. i.e. Glendale Community College

also what NTRP are the players in the California teams like

USC, UCLA and UC Berkeley?

7.0-7.5 or so.

Lindsay
09-11-2009, 07:44 AM
7.0-7.5 or so.

NTRP's go up to 7.0. Federer would be 7.0. So I doubt a guy from USC is 7.5.

Fedace
09-11-2009, 07:54 AM
NTRP's go up to 7.0. Federer would be 7.0. So I doubt a guy from USC is 7.5.

Federer is 10.0. NTRP should go up to 10.0

Lindsay
09-11-2009, 08:12 AM
Federer is 10.0. NTRP should go up to 10.0

but they don't......

gokou703
09-11-2009, 11:33 PM
7.0-7.5 or so.

wow..i guess i can say that I got a couple W's on some 7.0-7.5 ntrp women lol... awesome

T10s747
09-12-2009, 06:41 AM
If you look at the NTRP rating's guide, it has nothing to do with how well you strike the ball. It has to do with you ability to hit all shots from all court positions and use strategy as you are rated higher. Many pros cannot hit an assortment of shots. Many cannot use strategy (Ginepre) . But they strike the ball better and move much better than teaching pros. Ergo, NTRP ratings are meaningless.

AlexTennisAllDayLong
09-12-2009, 07:06 AM
NTRP's go up to 7.0. Federer would be 7.0. So I doubt a guy from USC is 7.5.

lol you tell federer he is 7.0, he is gonna laugh at you, Grand Slam winners are off the amateur charts

kendall22
10-05-2009, 05:53 PM
Federer wouldn't even know what a 7.0 is. Why would he know the U.S. amateur number system? In switzerland, the numbers go lower as one gets better.

TheRebelofPrince
10-15-2009, 03:25 AM
fedace stop taking drugs, u know what they do to u

nfor304
10-15-2009, 03:39 AM
"ad nauseum" LOL. I hope they add that to Webster's Dictionary.

erm... it is in the dictionary

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ad%20nauseam

'to a sickening or excessive degree'

slice bh compliment
10-15-2009, 12:55 PM
NTRP's are irrelevant. Take a look at the bios on the team roster and look at what their rankings and achievements were as a junior.

Truth. My impression is that nobody actually uses NTRP ratings until they're 30. Well, post-college at least.

I played a good level of tennis in the 80s and 90s. As a 30+ yr old, I've beaten some D2 kids pretty handily. I have a big serve and I've had trouble holding serve against some DI kids. Now, I'm positive I'd lose to some of the top DIII kids who would do fine in DI or 2. It's a good level out there, depending on the program. I'm guessing college kids range from 4.5 all the way up to almost the world-class/tour level.

ClarkC
10-15-2009, 07:27 PM
"ad nauseum" LOL. I hope they add that to Webster's Dictionary.

erm... it is in the dictionary

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ad%20nauseam

'to a sickening or excessive degree'

I guess you missed the fact that the laughter was over the spelling mistake, ad nauseum versus ad nauseam.

BreakPoint
10-15-2009, 07:40 PM
Federer is 10.0. NTRP should go up to 10.0
The NTRP scale only goes up to 7.0, but I agree that Federer is a 10.0 on a scale of 1.0 to 7.0. ;)

tennisplayer1993
08-19-2012, 04:29 PM
i would say at a mid-low tier division 1 team its 5.5. I know a kid whose part of a D1 college team thats lowly ranked. I know another kid who was recruited by Stanford and Georgia and he was ranked top 50 in the country when he graduated high school so I'm assuming he's a 6.5 or so. he straight setted the kid above about 6-0 6-1.

the 6.0ish guy is a huge big hitter. Hits 120mph serves and has a killer forehand. Never played a match on him but he kicked my best friend's butt and we're both 4.5-5.0.

probably also helps that he's well above 6'5''.

KineticChain
08-19-2012, 04:50 PM
holy thread bump batman

BHSC
08-20-2012, 06:21 AM
Generally:

a 7.0 player is a player with earnings greater than expenses.

A 6.5 is someone who is on the tour, but doesn't earn enough to cover expenses.

As the USTA guidlines say, 6.0 is someone ranked above #400 as well as ITA Div 1 ranked college players.

All Division I guys are considered 5.5 or better

J_R_B
08-20-2012, 06:35 AM
Generally:

a 7.0 player is a player with earnings greater than expenses.

A 6.5 is someone who is on the tour, but doesn't earn enough to cover expenses.

As the USTA guidlines say, 6.0 is someone ranked above #400 as well as ITA Div 1 ranked college players.

All Division I guys are considered 5.5 or better

5.5 is the minimum self-rating for D1 players, but so what? NTRP ratings are meaningless for these guys anyway. In reality, guys at the top major conference schools (like the Isners and Johnsons and Devvarmans...) are 6.5-7.0, ready for the tour. Most rank and file guys on these teams are 5.5-6.0 (IOW, still too good for USTA league...). Once you get down into lower teams and mid-majors, there are no more aspiring pros, and the top guys are high 5.5 type players. The rank and file players are more like 5.0-caliber and some even lower. There is one guy around here who plays doubles only for a weak mid major school who plays 4.0 league in the summer. Really, he could compete at 4.5, but he's definitely not higher than that.

BHSC
08-20-2012, 11:11 AM
Here's a list of the league ratings for the team that won the "Open" National title last year.

Player Name NTRP Player Name NTRP Player Name NTRP
Jeffrey Appel 5.5 Kaes Van't Hof 6.5 Adam El Mihdawy 7
Stephen Bass 6.5 Jason Pinsky 6 Mariusz Adamski 6
Cory A. Parr 6.5 Todd F. Paul 6.5


Match for National - National Championship

Date Match Played:10/30/2011 Date Scheduled:10/30/2011 Last Modified:11/1/2011
Match Home Team:Eastern NYAC Nationals
Team ID:***** Vs. Visiting Team:Intermo Pop
Team ID:***** 3rd Set Tie-break
#1 Singles Adam El Mihdawy Completed

Vs. vicente Jose joli

7-6 7-6
#1 Doubles Kaes Van't Hof Jason Pinsky
Completed
Vs. Clancy Shields Luke Shields

4-6 0-6
#2 Doubles Cory A. Parr Todd F. Paul
Completed

Vs. Thomas Schoeck Leif Meineke

6-4 5-7 1-0