PDA

View Full Version : Nadal will probably have a better career than Roger!


kraggy
05-23-2010, 11:28 AM
Jorge Nadal looks to be a decent player and my guess is that he will do better than Edouard Roger. Of course only time will tell.

Serendipitous
05-23-2010, 11:29 AM
Jorge Nadal looks to be a decent player and my guess is that he will do better than Edouard Roger. Of course only time will tell.

http://threadbombing.com/data/media/20/seriousdgif.gif

Hitman
05-23-2010, 11:34 AM
And thus begins another war!

TMF
05-23-2010, 11:35 AM
Jorge Nadal looks to be a decent player and my guess is that he will do better than Edouard Roger. Of course only time will tell.

Rafa may not win another slam again. Of course only time will tell.

kraggy
05-23-2010, 11:38 AM
Rafa may not win another slam again. Of course only time will tell.

How is Rafa in this discussion? Please refrain from making irrelevant comments.

Serendipitous
05-23-2010, 11:39 AM
How is Rafa in this discussion? Please refrain from making irrelevant comments.

http://threadbombing.com/data/media/48/1255996996856.jpg

TMF
05-23-2010, 11:44 AM
How is Rafa in this discussion? Please refrain from making irrelevant comments.

I know you are not talking a about Rafa, but to claim someone like Jorge will have a better career is a far fetch. Please refrain from making BAD thead.

TennisandMusic
05-23-2010, 11:45 AM
I know you are not talking a about Rafa, but to claim someone like Jorge will have a better career is a far fetch. Please refrain from making BAD thead.

Do you even read what you respond too?

Rhino
05-23-2010, 12:00 PM
What was it that Sampras once said when asked about the difference between him and Rafter?

"Ten grand slams".

TennisandMusic
05-23-2010, 12:02 PM
What was it that Sampras once said when asked about the difference between him and Rafter?

"Ten grand slams".

You too...do you read?

I swear, I can't tell if this board is hilarious or depressing.

TMF
05-23-2010, 12:06 PM
You too...do you read?

I swear, I can't tell if this board is hilarious or depressing.

Why bother to stick to the topic when it's not even worth it? Seriously, this thread Jorge vs Edouard is another waste of space in here.

raiden031
05-23-2010, 12:07 PM
Considering that Roger is ranked #127 and Nadal has no ranking, I'd put my money on Roger!

kraggy
05-23-2010, 12:11 PM
You too...do you read?

I swear, I can't tell if this board is hilarious or depressing.

You know before making this thread, I was sure that there would be a few morons who would comment without even reading the OP. I guess I've been proved right :-)

kraggy
05-23-2010, 12:11 PM
Considering that Roger is ranked #127 and Nadal has no ranking, I'd put my money on Roger!

Nadal has the age advantage though :P

Mustard
05-23-2010, 12:13 PM
What was it that Sampras once said when asked about the difference between him and Rafter?

"Ten grand slams".

That was after Rafter beat Sampras in the 1998 Cincinnati final. Not one of Sampras' best moments. Rafter beat Sampras again in the 1998 US Open semis.

World Beater
05-23-2010, 12:15 PM
this thread is an good experiment.

It tells us who the real ***** are...those who respond to defend their players honor without even reading the initial post.

Rhino
05-23-2010, 12:23 PM
this thread is an good experiment.

It tells us who the real ***** are...those who respond to defend their players honor without even reading the initial post.

100 times out of 100, if you say Nadal in the title, you mean Rafael.

How can the OP be bored? RG just started!

Gorecki
05-23-2010, 12:29 PM
this thread is a good idea. there is a world of players waiting for a thread in TTW...

Bring on The Jorgetards and Edurons

Let the tardwars begin!

World Beater
05-23-2010, 12:30 PM
100 times out of 100, if you say Nadal in the title, you mean Rafael.

How can the OP be bored? RG just started!

yea. but its still the title.

i mean...one should read the first post

A rush of blood to the head on the parts of many *******s here to respond in a knee-jerk like fashion.

But its no doubt a troll thread.

Polaris
05-23-2010, 12:37 PM
You know before making this thread, I was sure that there would be a few morons who would comment without even reading the OP.

And so you baited them, just to make fun of them later. In the process, you created a worthless thread, as if we don't have enough of them already.

Cynical trolling ********.

Rhino
05-23-2010, 12:40 PM
yea. but its still the title.

i mean...one should read the first post



I disagree. If you bothered to read every post with a title like this you would waste years of your life.

Augustus
05-23-2010, 12:43 PM
And so you baited them, just to make fun of them later. In the process, you created a worthless thread, as if we don't have enough of them already.

Cynical trolling ********.

Nice sig, Polaris! :)

davey25 has put me on ignore as well because I exposed the irrational bias in his posts in a few threads. He accused me of 'stalking' him... :lol:

bizarre_opinion
05-23-2010, 12:48 PM
one thing is clear from this thread, *******s can't read.

Polaris
05-23-2010, 12:49 PM
Nice sig, Polaris! :)

davey25 has put me on ignore as well because I exposed the irrational bias in his posts in a few threads. He accused me of 'stalking' him... :lol:

Hehe, thanks! That makes two of us :) . According to that logic, Rabbit and Moose Malloy - both among the best posters here - who were among the first to expose him are also stalkers, I guess.

Basically, if you disagree with davey25 and point out his tomfoolery, it automatically makes you a biased stalker. The funniest thing, which I hadn't expected at all, is that some posters actually support his multiple identity crap.

Fedbelly
05-23-2010, 12:52 PM
A nice playful little thread

World Beater
05-23-2010, 12:59 PM
I disagree. If you bothered to read every post with a title like this you would waste years of your life.

LOL.

yes but thats a slippery slope.

if you bothered to respond to threads like this...and there are many.

you would waste a lot of time too.

its one post for every thread...just the original one. if one is going to post, then make it an informed one.

kraggy
05-23-2010, 01:18 PM
And so you baited them, just to make fun of them later. In the process, you created a worthless thread, as if we don't have enough of them already.

Cynical trolling ********.

I make a distinction between humor/silly trolling and 'hater' trolling. Apparently you are incapable of seeing the difference. Thank you for your comments.

kraggy
05-23-2010, 01:19 PM
I disagree. If you bothered to read every post with a title like this you would waste years of your life.

Yeah so you could not be bothered to read but you could be bothered to enter the thread in the first place and then respond WITHOUT reading .:roll: