PDA

View Full Version : Modern Day Wood Racquet Tournament


Ray Mercer
04-26-2011, 07:41 PM
I was thinking the other day it would be pretty cool if some rich guy coughed up the money and hosted his own tournament with huge cash prizes to attract the top players. The only catch would be that everyone playing would be forced to play with a wood racquet built similar to racquets from the 1970's. Who do you guys think would fair well and would the game slowly revert to a more all court style towards the end of the tournament or would players still be content to try to slug from the baseline?

jackson vile
04-26-2011, 07:51 PM
That game would look like total trash, but would be a lot of fun to compete in. I would not watch it.

Backhanded Compliment
04-26-2011, 08:00 PM
Mac might make something like that happen.

Manus Domini
04-26-2011, 08:02 PM
I was thinking the other day it would be pretty cool if some rich guy coughed up the money and hosted his own tournament with huge cash prizes to attract the top players. The only catch would be that everyone playing would be forced to play with a wood racquet built similar to racquets from the 1970's. Who do you guys think would fair well and would the game slowly revert to a more all court style towards the end of the tournament or would players still be content to try to slug from the baseline?

Federer's Wilson contract might have to write in a clause allowing him to use a Wilson Jack Kramer autograph. If I'm not mistaken, pro contracts with racquet companies means they have to use a specific racquet, so that's a little bit tricky...

1970CRBase
04-26-2011, 08:06 PM
I was thinking the other day it would be pretty cool if some rich guy coughed up the money and hosted his own tournament with huge cash prizes to attract the top players. The only catch would be that everyone playing would be forced to play with a wood racquet built similar to racquets from the 1970's. Who do you guys think would fair well and would the game slowly revert to a more all court style towards the end of the tournament or would players still be content to try to slug from the baseline?

But they are not allowed to string up with RPM blast either right?

Mac will own everybody.

Ray Mercer
04-26-2011, 08:30 PM
But they are not allowed to string up with RPM blast either right?

Mac will own everybody.

Do you really believe Mcenroe would do well even with his age?

Manus Domini
04-26-2011, 08:31 PM
Do you really believe Mcenroe would do well even with his age?

I think he'd probably make finals.

joe sch
04-26-2011, 08:43 PM
That is a very interesting idea. Im sure if some very rich dude that was interested in old school tennis put togehter 5 million in prize money then some guys like McEnroe, Sampras, and maybe even some current players like Federer may decide to play some wood sticks for some big money wins. I think Mac would do pretty well. I also think there would be a many classic tennis fans that would love to see such an event. You can include me in that crowd.

Ray Mercer
04-26-2011, 09:01 PM
That is a very interesting idea. Im sure if some very rich dude that was interested in old school tennis put togehter 5 million in prize money then some guys like McEnroe, Sampras, and maybe even some current players like Federer may decide to play some wood sticks for some big money wins. I think Mac would do pretty well. I also think there would be a many classic tennis fans that would love to see such an event. You can include me in that crowd.

Do you think any of the current pros would fair well? Their athleticism may make up for poorer strategy and net play.

FedExpress 333
04-26-2011, 10:18 PM
This would be fun,,,, would like to see how Federer does...

MarinaHighTennis
04-26-2011, 11:00 PM
Do you think any of the current pros would fair well? Their athleticism may make up for poorer strategy and net play.

Federer, Nalbandian, Davydenko their styles work for wooden rackets.


I prefer wooden rackets than modern, I seem to hit heavier shots with less effort.

AlpineAce
04-26-2011, 11:13 PM
I think it would be awsome, even better if they COULD use Poly, wood racket just play sick with poly.

Id rather watch this than wimbledon.

Manus Domini
04-27-2011, 03:22 AM
That is a very interesting idea. Im sure if some very rich dude that was interested in old school tennis put togehter 5 million in prize money then some guys like McEnroe, Sampras, and maybe even some current players like Federer may decide to play some wood sticks for some big money wins. I think Mac would do pretty well. I also think there would be a many classic tennis fans that would love to see such an event. You can include me in that crowd.

the problem, though, would be racquet sponsorship issues...

Cooper_Tecnifibre4
04-27-2011, 03:24 AM
That game would look like total trash, but would be a lot of fun to compete in. I would not watch it.

Sure you wouldn't ;)

joe sch
04-27-2011, 07:01 AM
Do you think any of the current pros would fair well? Their athleticism may make up for poorer strategy and net play.

Yes, Im sure many of the players that do not have extreme swings would do very well. I have seen many 5.0 to open players just pickup some of my wood rackets and hit very well with them.

rdis10093
04-27-2011, 07:04 AM
I would pay to see this. Would be cool to see what the players that use alot of spin would do

montrealforum
04-27-2011, 09:58 AM
Make it the new fifth major, played at different venues each year, starting off at Newport.

AlpineAce
04-27-2011, 01:01 PM
3 words:
PAY-PER-VIEW

cocolate
04-27-2011, 01:41 PM
yea sure, make a slam where federer can still win:))

tenis1
04-27-2011, 01:46 PM
This is like talking about organizing a modern day formula one races with cars from the 20's. Or having one or two races in the formula one championship with old timer cars to see real drivers skills over the technology. :roll:

Yes sure that would make sense and many people would watch that over the today's formula one.

Not.

BrooklynNY
04-27-2011, 01:49 PM
yea sure, make a slam where federer can still win:))

Fed will lose to Michael Llodra 2-6 in the 5th.

mellowyellow
04-27-2011, 03:37 PM
yea sure, make a slam where federer can still win:))

you read my mind, a tourney where taking PED's would do little good. Glad we agree too, that Nadal does owe his racquets for his victories to some degree....

Devilito
04-27-2011, 04:39 PM
This is like talking about organizing a modern day formula one races with cars from the 20's. Or having one or two races in the formula one championship with old timer cars to see real drivers skills over the technology. :roll:

Yes sure that would make sense and many people would watch that over the today's formula one.

Not.

lol umm yeah. Formula one in the 20s was far more exciting. People crashing, drying, passing, blowing up, PASSING. Watching a Formula 1 race now is like watching paint dry. I can't even believe you used that as an example

CCNM
04-27-2011, 04:54 PM
I'd like to see that-current pros playing with wood racquets. I might actually watch every match from the begining to the final.

ttbrowne
04-27-2011, 05:31 PM
Bring back woolen trousers in the middle of summer. Women wearing the latest in 1919 tennis gear.
Yeah, What a concept. Gonna have to pass.

Max G.
04-27-2011, 06:34 PM
It's a fun idea, but it would unfortunately result in really bad play.

Lots of missed returns, lots of unforced errors, lots of bricked shots, lots of terrible touch (because they're not used to the feel of the racquets, even if they COULD have better touch if they were used to it.)

Those who win would be the ones who could outlast the others - someone who just hits deep and crosscourt all day and plays the percentages and gets into a groove and doesn't miss, because everyone else is going to be spraying balls when they try to do something fancy.

Ray Mercer
04-27-2011, 06:46 PM
It's a fun idea, but it would unfortunately result in really bad play.

Lots of missed returns, lots of unforced errors, lots of bricked shots, lots of terrible touch (because they're not used to the feel of the racquets, even if they COULD have better touch if they were used to it.)

Those who win would be the ones who could outlast the others - someone who just hits deep and crosscourt all day and plays the percentages and gets into a groove and doesn't miss, because everyone else is going to be spraying balls when they try to do something fancy.

That's Nadal to a T. High percentages, low risk, keeping the ball in play and not going for winners.

mellowyellow
04-28-2011, 06:09 AM
Nadal wouldn't even enter a tourney on REAL grass, with wooden racquets..... Their is no high percentage tennis when the ball doesn't bounce higher than your knees, and your racquet can't loop it 5ft. over the net

li0scc0
04-28-2011, 06:13 AM
Yes, Im sure many of the players that do not have extreme swings would do very well. I have seen many 5.0 to open players just pickup some of my wood rackets and hit very well with them.

A local 5.0 counterpuncher often hits with a local 4.5 player. They usually 'just hit', but when they play a match, it is typically 6-1 6-1.
The 5.0, who uses a 100 square inch racquet, decided to play the 4.5 with a wood racquet. The 4.5 continued using his Dunlop Aerogel 4d 300.
The end result?
The 5.0 won 6-2 6-1. Pretty much the same results.
I don't think a top pro would have too much trouble playing with a wood racquet. Sure his/her performance would decrease a bit, and some shots would be removed from their arsenal. But overall the level of play would be high.

1970CRBase
04-28-2011, 06:14 AM
It's a fun idea, but it would unfortunately result in really bad play.

Lots of missed returns, lots of unforced errors, lots of bricked shots, lots of terrible touch (because they're not used to the feel of the racquets, even if they COULD have better touch if they were used to it.)

Those who win would be the ones who could outlast the others - someone who just hits deep and crosscourt all day and plays the percentages and gets into a groove and doesn't miss, because everyone else is going to be spraying balls when they try to do something fancy.

If that's what is going to happen with the ATP men with their far better speed and footwork, can't begin to think how the WTA BBBs will manage.

li0scc0
04-28-2011, 06:22 AM
If that's what is going to happen with the ATP men with their far better speed and footwork, can't begin to think how the WTA BBBs will manage.

Actually the WTA MIGHT be better off. The women hit flatter shots, and you don't see as many shanks on the women's tour vs. the men's tour. Notice I said MIGHT...this is all conjecture.

1970CRBase
04-28-2011, 06:26 AM
Then again, Woz with her particular percentage game MAY do very well if she used wood. Only a guess.

li0scc0
04-28-2011, 06:33 AM
Then again, Woz with her particular percentage game MAY do very well if she used wood. Only a guess.

I actually see Wozniacki's style being HURT more than many of the other players, as her loopy topspin shots might be harder to come by with a small head wood racquet. A flat hitter like a Dementieva (yes I realize she is retired) would probably do well. An all court player like a Schiavone likely would, as well.

CMM
04-28-2011, 11:55 AM
Nadal wouldn't even enter a tourney on REAL grass, with wooden racquets..... Their is no high percentage tennis when the ball doesn't bounce higher than your knees, and your racquet can't loop it 5ft. over the net

Such a disgrace, isn't it?
"REAL" grass... I suppose wooden racquets are "REAL" racquets?
When Nadal started to learn how to play tennis he developed his game around the equipment that was being used at that time. He never played with a wood racquet. If he would have started his tennis career using those racquets, then he would have been forced to develop and adapt his game to those conditions. What's the point of asking yourself now how he would play using one of those?
The answer is irrelevant. No one cares.
And don't act as if he's got some unfair advantage over Federer.
Federer won his Slams by using modern equipment (not wood racquets) and he won most of his Wimbledon titles by playing on the same fake(?) grass.
I know, he achieved all that because he's oh so talented and he can become the greatest ever even when the entire world is conspiring against him.
Maybe you could invent a time machine and take him back to those times when players didn't use fake racquets, when the grass was real, when one handed backhands weren't being abused, when players weren't using PEDs, when passing shots were extremely rare, when tennis was "real".

sureshs
04-28-2011, 11:58 AM
I was thinking the other day it would be pretty cool if some rich guy coughed up the money and hosted his own tournament with huge cash prizes to attract the top players.

Breakpoint will do that

mellowyellow
04-28-2011, 12:35 PM
Such a disgrace, isn't it?
"REAL" grass... I suppose wooden racquets are "REAL" racquets?
When Nadal started to learn how to play tennis he developed his game around the equipment that was being used at that time. He never played with a wood racquet. If he would have started his tennis career using those racquets, then he would have been forced to develop and adapt his game to those conditions. What's the point of asking yourself now how he would play using one of those?
The answer is irrelevant. No one cares.
And don't act as if he's got some unfair advantage over Federer.
Federer won his Slams by using modern equipment (not wood racquets) and he won most of his Wimbledon titles by playing on the same fake(?) grass.
I know, he achieved all that because he's oh so talented and he can become the greatest ever even when the entire world is conspiring against him.
Maybe you could invent a time machine and take him back to those times when players didn't use fake racquets, when the grass was real, when one handed backhands weren't being abused, when players weren't using PEDs, when passing shots were extremely rare, when tennis was "real".

Get off of it already, I have never been one to criticize people for using whats legal. I in fact would love for Fed to use a 95sq. I certainly was no fan of the fast grass but its clearly been slowed down and made firmer for guys like Nadal. It used to be an accomplishment to successfully change from clay to grass, now you still have the same guys do well, predictable, because nothing is very different anymore about any surface. It did have its place on the tour and promoted a different style scarcely seen today. Now their are no carpet tourneys to boot. It would be a breathe of fresh air to see guys use clean striking of the ball and for guys to actually work a point not just use their equipment to bludgeon a ball into a position their opponent cant get a clean hit on. It would be nice to see a tourney where the guy on defense can't just go for broke and slap a winner 3ft. wide and 6ft. deep in their own court completely outstretched, it used to be something to see, now its commonplace for guys to come up with something "spectacular". Lest we forget though it is all about money, just like holidays, and a vast majority of other sports, tennis has succumbed to the juggernaut that is commercialization.

CMM
04-28-2011, 12:59 PM
Get off of it already, I have never been one to criticize people for using whats legal. I in fact would love for Fed to use a 95sq. I certainly was no fan of the fast grass but its clearly been slowed down and made firmer for guys like Nadal. It used to be an accomplishment to successfully change from clay to grass, now you still have the same guys do well, predictable, because nothing is very different anymore about any surface. It did have its place on the tour and promoted a different style scarcely seen today. Now their are no carpet tourneys to boot. It would be a breathe of fresh air to see guys use clean striking of the ball and for guys to actually work a point not just use their equipment to bludgeon a ball into a position their opponent cant get a clean hit on. It would be nice to see a tourney where the guy on defense can't just go for broke and slap a winner 3ft. wide and 6ft. deep in their own court completely outstretched, it used to be something to see, now its commonplace for guys to come up with something "spectacular". Lest we forget though it is all about money, just like holidays, and a vast majority of other sports, tennis has succumbed to the juggernaut that is commercialization.

No? It seems to me that's exactly what you're doing.
You criticized Nadal for supposedly not being able to play well with a wood racquet. I don't think that's illegal. You criticize the people who develop the surfaces because they make slower courts. Is that illegal?
You criticize defensive players, you criticize the fact that the players of this era are playing well on all surfaces, you criticize the lack of tournaments played on carpet, you criticize the fact that tennis has become too commercial nowadays, etc..
The fact that you don't like all of this, doesn't mean that there's something wrong with it. Other people might have a different opinion.
But I'm sure that if Federer would be still number one and dominate the tour, "the problems" regarding the surfaces, the strings, the commercialization, would be non-existent.

tenis1
04-28-2011, 01:11 PM
A local 5.0 counterpuncher often hits with a local 4.5 player. They usually 'just hit', but when they play a match, it is typically 6-1 6-1.
The 5.0, who uses a 100 square inch racquet, decided to play the 4.5 with a wood racquet. The 4.5 continued using his Dunlop Aerogel 4d 300.
The end result?
The 5.0 won 6-2 6-1. Pretty much the same results.
I don't think a top pro would have too much trouble playing with a wood racquet. Sure his/her performance would decrease a bit, and some shots would be removed from their arsenal. But overall the level of play would be high.

So playing with wooden rackquet cost him one game :shock:
That is outrageous. We should forbid all tech improvements on tennis equipment in the last 50 years.

mental midget
04-28-2011, 01:21 PM
A local 5.0 counterpuncher often hits with a local 4.5 player. They usually 'just hit', but when they play a match, it is typically 6-1 6-1.
The 5.0, who uses a 100 square inch racquet, decided to play the 4.5 with a wood racquet. The 4.5 continued using his Dunlop Aerogel 4d 300.
The end result?
The 5.0 won 6-2 6-1. Pretty much the same results.
I don't think a top pro would have too much trouble playing with a wood racquet. Sure his/her performance would decrease a bit, and some shots would be removed from their arsenal. But overall the level of play would be high.

agreed. they'd play just fine, i think it would be a very interesting tournament. and everyone talking about how nadal's game would fall apart are delusional, of course he'd generate less spin than with the babolat, but a guarantee you his game would still be formidable. it's not like you can't hit topspin with a wooden racket, you can generate plenty, it's not that big a deal. there would be less return winners, and generally less winners blasted from defensive positions, but apart from that, i think the level of play would be pretty recognizable as professional-level tennis.

mellowyellow
04-28-2011, 03:51 PM
No?
The fact that you don't like all of this, doesn't mean that there's something wrong with it. Other people might have a different opinion.
But I'm sure that if Federer would be still number one and dominate the tour, "the problems" regarding the surfaces, the strings, the commercialization, would be non-existent.
Thats funny, because the common consensus is that the game has evolved for the worse, thats not me saying it, thats just about everybody that is a name in tennis from past/current players to announcers. I didn't say Nadal couldn't, I said he wouldn't. Everyone would be capable of adapting, but for some players it would be completely different from what they do on the court and would obviously take longer. I think that this surface homogenization and lack of variety have been a big topic long before Federer was number 1 and the dominate player. Seems like their was plenty of grumbling when Hewitt and Nalby were the Wimby finalist. I think if tennis was televised more back in the 80's their would be even more outcry from the fans for different speed surfaces, and different styles of play. The problem is that the general weekend watcher doesn't know any better than what their force fed every weekend. That just so happens to be what TV/ITF has decided would be good for the sport. Longer rallies, and Agassi style winners. They got sick of the S/V 2-4 stroke points. No one wants to watch a serving match, but they have made tha S/V game non existent and that is a shame.

mellowyellow
04-28-2011, 04:15 PM
Yeah the commercialism is a real problem when instead of showing the other quarterfinal matches of a tourney they continue to repeat the same American player's match over and over and over. Again instead of promoting the little bit of variety they have lets show the Agassi/Samparas/Roddick match again even though he lost, or lets watch that Williams/Davenport match even though she lost..... and now it continues with Fed/Nadal/Djok/.....

CMM
04-29-2011, 12:02 AM
Thats funny, because the common consensus is that the game has evolved for the worse, thats not me saying it, thats just about everybody that is a name in tennis from past/current players to announcers. I didn't say Nadal couldn't, I said he wouldn't. Everyone would be capable of adapting, but for some players it would be completely different from what they do on the court and would obviously take longer. I think that this surface homogenization and lack of variety have been a big topic long before Federer was number 1 and the dominate player. Seems like their was plenty of grumbling when Hewitt and Nalby were the Wimby finalist. I think if tennis was televised more back in the 80's their would be even more outcry from the fans for different speed surfaces, and different styles of play. The problem is that the general weekend watcher doesn't know any better than what their force fed every weekend. That just so happens to be what TV/ITF has decided would be good for the sport. Longer rallies, and Agassi style winners. They got sick of the S/V 2-4 stroke points. No one wants to watch a serving match, but they have made tha S/V game non existent and that is a shame.

I'm not sure about the common consensus part. Just because Pat Cash says that tennis was more exciting when he was playing doesn't necessarily mean that it's true. That's just his opinion and since he used to play serve and volley then his opinion might be a little biased.
I don't think "everybody" says that tennis has evolved for the worse. Only some of the nostalgic tennis fans and those who liked serve and volley.
But that's just a matter of taste. Some enjoyed that type of tennis, some enjoy watching longer rallies.
I don't think the slow surfaces have such a big influence. The US Open surface is still fast enough and that from Paris Bercy too.
I know Llodra did well there last year, but in the end it was still Soderling (a ball basher) and Monfils (a defensive player) who reached the final.

mellowyellow
04-29-2011, 06:44 AM
Maybe you think Pat Cash is "everybody" in tennis because he is your idol? I am talking about people like the 2 Macs, Sampras, Agassi, Navratilova, Evert, Becker, Edberg, Gilbert, Carlos Moya wishes he could play that style of tennis, then all the Announcers that cover any of the tennis, makes me wonder if you watch tennis as all, because they all talk about tennis and there not being any S/V players on the mens or womens side now and how its a travesty to the sport. That does not mean the quality in the players themselves is lacking, but that the sport on a whole is lacking 1/3 of the players it used to have. Lacking a 1/3 of the style. Think about what the world would be like if in everything, you took 1/3 of the variety away. Hairstyles, automobiles, house design, flavors for drinks/foods. Thats what you have in tennis right now........ On a side note, I don't recall any player or announcer saying that we need more rallies, longer rallies, and more baseline bashing, no one seems to saying that. In fact its just the opposite, all the current players having a baseline style game (everybody) talk about getting to net more, and incorporating that into their game more. I think too what you are missing here is that you don't have a "miracle" run by guys like Pete Sampras/Tim Henman at the French Open to the Semis. I never liked Tim, but to see him especially incorporate his style on clay against all odds was something to see. Agassi's runs at Wimby on "real" grass was an against all odds affair as well. Watching guys change strategy to be effective on the grass, or effective on the clay was always cool, and entertaining because you had real upsets, not favorites being beaten by less favorites who are just as adept at the baseline game.

GS
04-29-2011, 07:00 AM
There used to be a small "Woods and Whites" amateur tournament near here years ago, on some guy's private grass court. You had to wear long white pants.
A buddy of mine won a 4.0 tournament about 10 years ago with his wood racquets and natural gut. I'm sure he blew his opponents' minds when he opened his tennis bag, and again when he beat them.
Remember years ago, when Tennis magazine tested Philippoussis with his graphite racquet, and a wood one? He actually served alittle harder with the wood.

mellowyellow
04-29-2011, 07:06 AM
This is my last post on this, I am done with this topic. No one ever took 1/3 of their crayons out of the box and threw them away because it made coloring a better experience, anyone that thinks the lack of variety in tennis now weather it be in style of play or personality is a freaking moron and has a hidden agenda for a favorite/favorited player/players. There are not enough tourneys for players to consciously model their game to fast courts. The first half of the year is clay or slow hard then back to clay. There is even clay after Wimby is over.....
P.S. Thats why their is a possibility of a wood racquet tourney happening, because it would answer many questions about the players we have today, ad per the OP's original question, I would lean towards an all court style being the more dominate style. Happy Alpine?

AlpineAce
04-29-2011, 07:16 AM
way to derail this thread

radigan
04-29-2011, 06:48 PM
We have a local tournament using wood rackets only. It is fun and the advertising of the tourney leaves a lot of room for interpretation... Must have wood to play. Bring your own wood... It just goes on and on.

With that said, I would definately watch. Remember Roddick playing with a frying pan? These guys are just that good. It would be a very entertaining match.

Love Anet
10-19-2012, 03:07 AM
I think players would come to the net more because it would be more difficult to hit passing shots, which is the way tennis is supposed to be. Djokovic would still beat Mcenroe because the actual stroke technique of players has become more advanced. It's a great idea and I think the ratings would be very high.:)

Metalica
10-19-2012, 03:35 AM
I think Stepanek or Llodra would dominate

dominikk1985
10-19-2012, 03:41 AM
fed would still be great. his wristy FH would be limited a little but his one hander would work well and he was also a great s&v player when he was younger. in 2003 wimby he played a ton of s&v.

I would love to see such a tournament. I'm not saying go back to wood but doing it once for fun would be cool.

Magnetite
10-19-2012, 04:04 AM
Would be a fun watch. Some of the tennis would be bad (for pro standards), and it would be funny to watch Rafa serve and volley. Fed, Llodra, Stepanek and a few others would do reasonably well. They could bring back Pistol Pete, Rafter, Johnny Mac, and Edberg for good measure.

Racket sponsors wouldn't care, as long as they used that particular company's old wooden racket, and it had a their logo on the strings.

All the major companies had woodies.

robbo1970
10-19-2012, 04:27 AM
I think it would be great. And no reason why some wooden rackets couldnt have a modern PJ applied. Id love to see Nadal swinging a JK with an APD pj.

I recall an interview with Sue Barker when she spoke about an exhibition that Tim Henman gave and he played against a celebrity who plays tennis using a cricket bat and still beat the celebrity.

These top players can play with anything, it may not be their normal style of play but they would be facing an opponent in a like for like situation. I think it would be a good charity exhibition.

Maybe they should stage an "All wood competition" in support of men with erectile disfunction.

mmk
10-19-2012, 04:47 AM
Would be a fun watch. Some of the tennis would be bad (for pro standards), and it would be funny to watch Rafa serve and volley. Fed, Llodra, Stepanek and a few others would do reasonably well. They could bring back Pistol Pete, Rafter, Johnny Mac, and Edberg for good measure.

Racket sponsors wouldn't care, as long as they used that particular company's old wooden racket, and it had a their logo on the strings.

All the major companies had woodies.

Did Babolat ever make wood racquets?

Magnetite
10-19-2012, 05:03 AM
Did Babolat ever make wood racquets?

Right. I forgot about Babolat, that could be a problem. I'm sure they could come up with something for one event though. Maybe the Babolat guys could paint their rackets black?

I hate the feel of Babolats, so I guess I forgot about them :/

Either way, it would be fun to watch.

PrinceMoron
10-20-2012, 02:49 PM
Henman could commentate, he is pretty wooden.

vil
10-21-2012, 03:28 AM
I don't understand, how you guys think that Mac would be still competitive. Don't you think, he is a bit old for these young pros. Yes, he is used to wood but seriously, I don't think he would stand the chance. Get real.

treblings
10-21-2012, 04:01 AM
McEnroe hasn´t played a competitive match with a wooden racquet in decades. the idea that he could switch so easily while others can´t is not really well thought through
the age factor would prevent him from winning anything in such a tournament against current pros

NamRanger
10-21-2012, 07:19 AM
I don't understand, how you guys think that Mac would be still competitive. Don't you think, he is a bit old for these young pros. Yes, he is used to wood but seriously, I don't think he would stand the chance. Get real.



He still plays very competitively vs most pros in WTT. Certainly loses to them more times than not, but the fact that Mac is more familiar with the intricacies with wooden racquets gives him a distinct advantage over current pros.

Migelowsky
10-21-2012, 11:10 AM
from "You cannot be serious" :

4. A return to wooden rackets would be a huge improvement for professional tennis. The biggest change in the game in the last twenty-five years—the replacement of wood by graphite—has been a bad one. I happen to think that wooden rackets are beautiful aesthetically and purer for the game. Look at baseball: Kids start with aluminum bats in Little League, then move on to graphite or Kevlar or whatever in college, and then—and only then—if they make it to the majors, do they get to use these beautiful wooden bats that require greater expertise for success. Why not do the same thing in tennis? I think it looks great to have a little wand in your hand, instead of some ultra-thick club big enough to kill somebody with! Wood, to me, has glamour. You need strategy and technique. Tennis, these days, is sadly lacking in all those things: It’s all (as David Bowie said) Wham, bam, thank you, ma’am.

McEnroe, John; Kaplan, James (2002-06-10). You Cannot Be Serious . Penguin Group. Kindle Edition.

Love Anet
10-22-2012, 07:42 AM
Coming to the net is always going to be risky for the obvious reason that if your opponent can pass you then the point is over.

The problem is nowadays the risk of being passed is far too high even if you hit a good approach shot. This is caused by slower balls, slower courts and racquet string technology. This doesn't only screw up net players, it also screws up attacking baseliners. The only players it benefits are really fit baseline players who can spin the ball back over and over and over again until there's a slight opening or the other player misses.

treblings
10-22-2012, 01:40 PM
Coming to the net is always going to be risky for the obvious reason that if your opponent can pass you then the point is over.

The problem is nowadays the risk of being passed is far too high even if you hit a good approach shot. This is caused by slower balls, slower courts and racquet string technology. This doesn't only screw up net players, it also screws up attacking baseliners. The only players it benefits are really fit baseline players who can spin the ball back over and over and over again until there's a slight opening or the other player misses.

and therein lies the problem of modern tennis. it´s become one-dimensional and makes us long for the good old days of wood and natural gut