PDA

View Full Version : Nadal will have to...


TheMagicianOfPrecision
06-09-2011, 08:58 AM
...win 6 GS out of the next 10 if he wanna be in the same category as the alltime greatest Roger Federer.

Not that easy

I am not seeing Nadal winning ANY slams from AO 2014 and forward.

If you read this carefully, you see there is no hate or anything, just a thought that crossed my mind.

Discuss if you like

Mick
06-09-2011, 09:15 AM
even if he could do it, he still wouldn't be in the same category as federer in the eyes of some people :)

Sentinel
06-09-2011, 10:29 AM
what about 5 YEC/WTF's ?? Does he not need those to be in the same category.

Let's not be so generous, OP.

Nadalfan89
06-09-2011, 10:32 AM
what about 5 YEC/WTF's ?? Does he not need those to be in the same category.

Let's not be so generous, OP.

What about record number of master's and a gold medal? How about a winning H2H against your main rival? Doesn't Federer need those? Don't be so generous to Fed.

Sentinel
06-09-2011, 10:45 AM
...win 6 GS out of the next 10 if he wanna be in the same category as the alltime greatest Roger Federer.

Not that easy


Discuss if you like
Not that easy, since Noel ain't gonna allow Raphla to win any more slams. Maybe an FO or 2, but not the others.

Sentinel
06-09-2011, 10:51 AM
What about record number of master's and a gold medal? How about a winning H2H against your main rival? Doesn't Federer need those? Don't be so generous to Fed.
Hush, little one. How many masters is Fed short of Rafa. And how many Gold medals ?

And who else has Olympic singles gold medals. Gosh, i can hardly even remember the names of those players. And did you know, in 1996 the bronze medal was won by Leander Paes who is not even known to be a singles player. What was his world rank then ? Pretty much shows how much value an Oly medal has compared to a slam.

Gorecki
06-09-2011, 10:54 AM
Hush, little one. How many masters is Fed short of Rafa. And how many Gold medals ?

And who else has Olympic singles gold medals. Gosh, i can hardly even remember the names of those players. And did you know, in 1996 the bronze medal was won by Leander Paes who is not even known to be a singles player. What was his world rank then ? Pretty much shows how much value an Oly medal has compared to a slam.

Olympics... ffs.. even Zeeshan Ali made it to Oly's main draw!!!

Aeropax
06-09-2011, 10:55 AM
If Nadal can hit 14 or 15 he'll exceed Federer. Davis Cup, head-to-head, and OLYMPIC GOLD IN SINGLES far out weight ONE grand slam.

Hell, I'd say an Olympic Gold is worth 3 slams.

Gorecki
06-09-2011, 10:59 AM
Davis Cup,

lets say ferrer, lopez, verdasco... they are all better than Federer too...

head-to-head,

Hrbaty better than Nadal, so is Davydenko!

and OLYMPIC GOLD IN SINGLES

Zeeshan ali...

far out weight ONE grand slam.

oh yes...

Hell, I'd say an Olympic Gold is worth 3 slams.

i would say about 5, being two sw19s...

tennisfarmer
06-09-2011, 11:46 AM
...win 6 GS out of the next 10 if he wanna be in the same category as the alltime greatest Roger Federer.

Not that easy

I am not seeing Nadal winning ANY slams from AO 2014 and forward.

If you read this carefully, you see there is no hate or anything, just a thought that crossed my mind.

Discuss if you like

no he has equal or surpass Fed's grand-slam titles, nothing more, nothing less

tennisfarmer
06-09-2011, 11:46 AM
................*he has to

bolo
06-09-2011, 11:49 AM
Hmmn Day 4 and Nadal's RG victory still seems so fresh! :)

zagor
06-09-2011, 11:52 AM
Hmmn Day 4 and Nadal's RG victory still seems so fresh! :)

I will have nightmares about that 1st for the whole year atleast.

bolo
06-09-2011, 11:56 AM
I will have nightmares about that 1st for the whole year atleast.

well hopefully federer wins something soon and we can all move forward.

Mick
06-09-2011, 12:00 PM
well hopefully federer wins something soon and we can all move forward.

if he wins wimbledon, then he'll be great once again :)

TheMagicianOfPrecision
06-09-2011, 12:02 PM
And I'd like to add that we've been hearing that Nadal will burn out for 3-4 years now, but he's still winning slams ;)

You are right, Slams are not everything. WTF:s are also really important.

Exagerate much,no? I doubt that there were ANY (not even HERE) who said Nadal was burned out at 21-22, thats ridiculous

TheMagicianOfPrecision
06-09-2011, 12:05 PM
Hell, I'd say an Olympic Gold is worth 3 slams.

Listen to this NADAL-FANS. This is the reason I cant stand you

TheNatural
06-09-2011, 12:06 PM
Fed needs Rafa to win less than 6 out of the next 20 slams or Rafa will remain greater than Fed.

Rafa has 10/28 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rafael_Nadal_career_statistics) (35% strike rate)
Fed has 16/48 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roger_Federer_career_statistics) (33% strike rate)

crazyups
06-09-2011, 12:10 PM
How about the fact that slams and YEC favor hard court specialists? Twice as many hard court slams compared to grass or clay.

Povl Carstensen
06-09-2011, 12:16 PM
What Nadal needs to do to catch up with Federer, the eternal discussion... And yes, the answer remains that time willl tell.
But gazzillions of words will be wasted before that time.
I will try to avoid it, and focus on playing end enjoying tennis, and whats it called...oh yes a life.

zagor
06-09-2011, 12:16 PM
well hopefully federer wins something soon and we can all move forward.

Once he win Basel or Stockholm all will be well again.

TheMagicianOfPrecision
06-09-2011, 12:17 PM
Once he win Basel or Stockholm all will be well again.

Do not insult the Stockholm Open, i was there and it was epic!:twisted:

TheMagicianOfPrecision
06-09-2011, 12:18 PM
I will try to avoid it, and focus on playing end enjoying tennis, and whats it called...oh yes a life.

Thats great man! Good for you, tell me how it goes!

zagor
06-09-2011, 12:19 PM
Do not insult the Stockholm Open, i was there and it was epic!:twisted:

LOL,I envy you for watching that grizzled Swiss veteran live :).It was a good tounament,I enjoyed Fed's matches against Ljubicic,Stan and Mayer in the final.

bolo
06-09-2011, 12:19 PM
Once he win Basel or Stockholm all will be well again.

lol. 10 char. :)

TheMagicianOfPrecision
06-09-2011, 12:21 PM
LOL,I envy you for watching that grizzled Swiss veteran live :).It was a good tounament,I enjoyed Fed's matches against Ljubicic,Stan and Mayer in the final.

Yeah it felt unreal, i sat 5 metres from Federer , fantastic!:)

Speranza
06-09-2011, 12:31 PM
Yeah it felt unreal, i sat 5 metres from Federer , fantastic!:)

Holmes: For some immature reason, I really wished you'd have added an 'h' in your sentence somewhere.... ;)

Fedex
06-09-2011, 12:36 PM
...win 6 GS out of the next 10 if he wanna be in the same category as the alltime greatest Roger Federer.

Not that easy

I am not seeing Nadal winning ANY slams from AO 2014 and forward.

If you read this carefully, you see there is no hate or anything, just a thought that crossed my mind.

Discuss if you like

But if you read between the lines, there is actually plenty of hate ha ha.

namelessone
06-09-2011, 12:42 PM
Holmes: For some immature reason, I really wished you'd have added an 'h' in your sentence somewhere.... ;)

:):):)

A real "floater" in the draw next to Fed, eh?

Speranza
06-09-2011, 12:44 PM
:):):)

A real "floater" in the draw next to Fed, eh?

Holmes: Bum-tish! .... Very good namelessone :)

Satch
06-09-2011, 12:45 PM
If Nadal can hit 14 or 15 he'll exceed Federer. Davis Cup, head-to-head, and OLYMPIC GOLD IN SINGLES far out weight ONE grand slam.

Hell, I'd say an Olympic Gold is worth 3 slams.

Maybe it's worth 3 slams but it's not a slam...

So you cant count it like that. If he wins 15 he will still have 1 less than Roger period.

powerangle
06-09-2011, 12:49 PM
...win 6 GS out of the next 10 if he wanna be in the same category as the alltime greatest Roger Federer.

Not that easy

I am not seeing Nadal winning ANY slams from AO 2014 and forward.

If you read this carefully, you see there is no hate or anything, just a thought that crossed my mind.

Discuss if you like


I can see why Nadal would "have to" win 6 slams...but why 6 out of 10?

I don't think Nadal will retire that early, especially if he's close to Fed's tally. He'll probably be hungry enough to hunt it down (play another slam or two) if he's just 1 shy.

TheMagicianOfPrecision
06-09-2011, 12:55 PM
I can see why Nadal would "have to" win 6 slams...but why 6 out of 10?

I don't think Nadal will retire that early, especially if he's close to Fed's tally. He'll probably be hungry enough to hunt it down (play another slam or two) if he's just 1 shy.

Because 10 GS is how many there are left until AO 2014- The year I think Nadal might retire-atleast I dont see him winning slams at 28

Fedex
06-09-2011, 01:02 PM
Big bird Berdych is going to dominate the Slams starting with Wimbledon.
You heard it here first.
(Mark my words)

powerangle
06-09-2011, 03:44 PM
If Nadal can hit 14 or 15 he'll exceed Federer. Davis Cup, head-to-head, and OLYMPIC GOLD IN SINGLES far out weight ONE grand slam.

Hell, I'd say an Olympic Gold is worth 3 slams.

So we can count Nadal's "extra stats on the side" besides Federer, but we can't count Federer's "extras"? What about all those 3-slam years and total dominance of Fed, what about all the weeks at #1, year-ending #1, WTF/YEC titles?

It's not like Fed ONLY has the slam count going for him (over Nadal).

When you factor in all the statistics, it counter-balances some of Nadal's other stats that he has over Fed. And then after all that, when you consider the one or two slam deficit (since you mentioned if Nadal can hit 14 or 15)...it's not so obvious anymore. There will still be some room for discussion.

Nadal will have to at least pull level in the slam count to be considered "greater" than Fed (for me), since Rafa will still likely be deficient in other stats compared to Federer. If Nadal pads his #1 weeks a lot more (a LOT more), maybe win a couple WTFs, etc...then I could consider Nadal greater, maybe, if he is one slam short of Fed.

TennisandMusic
06-09-2011, 04:00 PM
How about the fact that slams and YEC favor hard court specialists? Twice as many hard court slams compared to grass or clay.

Yup, if the setup for the majors was 2 clay, 1 hard court and 1 grass per year, Nadal would already be the all time leader at total majors, which is why the whole "only slams matter" perspective is slightly misleading. It's highly surface dependent, and HIGHLY skewed towards those who have a "hard court game".

As it stands now we have three "fast court" majors, and one "slow court" major. Can you imagine if it were 3-1 the other direction? Federer would be considered an "also ran", which of course wouldn't be fair.

Major counts simply don't tell the whole story. That said I still think Federer and Nadal are basically the two best players to play the game. Maybe that's a bit unfair to past greats since they didn't have the advantage of the great gear the current guys get to use, but those are the breaks.

pound cat
06-09-2011, 04:17 PM
If Federer can't manage to win the 2012 single's medal, (his dream) then certainly his career will not be a complete one,,,by his standards and those of the tennis world. His legacy hinges on that gold medal.

JustBob
06-09-2011, 04:17 PM
I don't believe that Rafa will win 6 more slams. Heck, I don't believe he will catch Sampras. Does it matter to me in the grand scheme of things? Nope. Tennis fans should feel privileged that they can witness the performances of two of the best players to have ever played the game, regardless of how different their styles might be.

JustBob
06-09-2011, 04:22 PM
If Federer can't manage to win the 2012 single's medal, (his dream) then certainly his career will not be a complete one,,,by his standards and those of the tennis world. His legacy hinges on that gold medal.


Well maybe by his standards, but I hardly believe the tennis world will care that much. Well except for a few people on this forum. And I seriously doubt that the legacy of former greats is tarnished by the absence of tennis at the Olympics prior to 1988.

mcr619619
06-09-2011, 08:28 PM
It's rather funny that Federer's resurgence in 2009 when he got back to no.1 and won the FO and WB, and then the AO, was a result of Nadal's setback with his injury at the FO which made him also withdraw from WB and then try to get back slowly into top shape. And then Nadal reclaims his no.1 and redominates the slams. Federer should have 13-14 slams now, and Nadal 12-13. Federer is lucky for that setback in Nadal's career and took advantage of it, but see Nadal will still reach Federer anyways!

But see, he doesn't even need to reach Federer, it's not only about slam totals. As many have said before, tennis is more than slams, otherwise Margaret Court would automatically be greater than Martina Navratilova or Steffi Graf, which isn't the case. Also back then the AO wasn't played by top players such as Bjorg, otherwise totals would be different for many players. You have to consider tons of other factors like overall titles (where Federer is weak compared to many greats like Connors or Lendl), key head-to-heads (lol), longevity, etc. Federer still can make a big case for him and at this point I'd still rank him as GOAT, BUT Rafa is quickly making a better case for himself. Sampras' weakness was the french open, Federer's weakness was Rafa, but Rafa has no weakness. By adding a few more slams and a little more longevity, he will be the ultimate champion. He also has the gold medal, the most masters series ever, winning head to heads against all his big rivals. He also is headed towards 2 special records (the most titles in one grandslams, right now it's Sampras with 7 wimbledons, so I'd say Rafa will easily end with 8 FOs... AND also, by winning another US Open and another Aussie, very doable, he will have won each slam at least twice). Actually right now, Rafa has 6 clay, 2 grass and 2 hardcourts. Federer has 6 grass, 9 harcourts but 1 clay. So Rafa already has 2 on each surface and is more diverse. I'd say Federer's 1 clay win could be seen as a fluke, a result of Rafa's setback in 2009 with his injury at FO which also forced him to withdraw from WB and start over again to get back on top. Without that setback, chances are that Federer wouldn't have had 16 slams either. It's a Rafa world, we just wait in it!

mehhhh... so Federer was lucky? i don't think so...it's the way Rafa played, he forced his body by doing his game..injured wrist, thigh, knees, almost every.the only thing that isn't injured in Nadal is his heart and mentality, Federer plays less injuryprone style, he dont need to battered himself to win GS...Rafa is the best Claycouter, but GOAT, it will be federer, it's about dominance(rafa also dominates, 2008 and 2010 though) and consistency(not even close, 23 consecutive semifinal GS) ..at the age of almost 30, and still a force to be reckon with...

but if nadal wins around another 8 grandslam..yeah 18 overall...then it would be pretty close..and he needs to win WTF at least 3 times...

and if someone gonna put that H2H AGAin, shut up, ..The Tour wasn't just about Fed and Nadal, there's thousand of players..

as Tio Toni said.. Nadal style is not good for Federer, and Fed's mentality aint good against his boy..

you know, Michael Jordan can't beat Ray allen in 3 point shoot out...but that ain't make Allen a better player..

Sentinel
06-09-2011, 09:34 PM
^ Most of these are just laughable. But i give you this ...

Federer will not break Nadal's record of weeks at #2, LOL !!!!

mcr619619
06-09-2011, 11:33 PM
@********* - Lol,...especially at the "Left handers"...and no, 1 WTF ain't gonna be enough...

Sharpshooter
06-09-2011, 11:40 PM
Yeah it felt unreal, i sat 5 metres from Federer , fantastic!:)

I was standing directly in front of Fed after his practice session at the Aus Open in 09 until a fat security guard pushed me away. Though I made sure he heard me say I hope Rafa beats you again! LOL how it actually happened!

MichaelNadal
06-09-2011, 11:42 PM
^ Most of these are just laughable. But i give you this ...

Federer will not break Nadal's record of weeks at #2, LOL !!!!

They aren't as impressive as a lot of Federer's records for sure. But don't be a troll, they aren't laughable.

Povl Carstensen
06-10-2011, 03:08 AM
Rafa only needs to win WTF once, because he has so many other edges over Federer, like Olympic Singles Gold, Masters Shields - Rafa already has the record, and plenty of years left to rack up around 30 of them - and the head2head which is so lopsided it will be taken into account. Also all these records-

Only lost one match in Grand Slam play after winning the first set.

Only male player in the open era to win 21 consecutive grand slam matches within a calendar year
(French open 2010 - US Open 2010).

Lost only six sets in winning the three titles namely French Open, Wimbledon & US Open in 2010.

Nadal is the only player in the Open Era to win more than one ATP Tournament at least 6 times in his career.

Best career outdoor match winning percentage: 85.35% (466-80).

Winner of the most Golden Bagel Awards (3) in Open Era during the year 2005, 2008 and 2009.

Most consecutive weeks as World Number 2 than any player in the history of the computer rankings maintained by the
Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP): 160 weeks.

Most weeks at No.2: 189 weeks.

Quickest player to reach 400 wins by playing less than 500 matches (401-91).

Established a lead of 5245 points in October 2010, a record since the point values were doubled in 2009.

Nadal has earned the highest amount of prize money ever in a single season, $10,171,998, in 2010.

Winner of the 2010 Laureus Sportsman Award of the Year. Nadal had earlier won the 2006 Laureus Award for the
World Newcomer of the Year.

Only male player in history to win Roland Garros, Wimbledon and US Open in the same year on 3 different surfaces.

Tied the US Open serving record to become the 2nd player in history to only be broken 5 times (Roddick is the other).

Highest 5 set winning% of all-time.

Best Grand Slam Finals conversion rate in history of players to have won 5 slams or more.

Most Masters Shields Ever (19).

Only player ever to win 3 straight Masters Shields.

Youngest male in Open Era to win the Career Grand Slam.

Youngest male ever to win the Career Golden Grand Slam.

Winner of 28 consecutive Grand Slam sets in the year 2010 and 24 in 2008.

Only male to have won French Open, Wimbledon, and Olympic Gold Medal in the same year (2008 ).

Most singles titles won in a single season as a teenager: 11 (2005).

Won 24 consecutive matches, the longest winning streak of any teenager in the open era, in 2005.

Nadal joins Aussie legend Rod Laver as the only left-handers to win all four Grand Slams.

The only player to have lost just one game in an ATP World Tour Masters 1000 final (Monte Carlo 2010: 6-0, 6-1).

Longest single-surface winning streak in the Open Era: 81 matches (11 April 2005 - 20 May 2007).

31 consecutive match wins at Roland Garros.

58–1 record in best-of-five-set matches on clay.

Quickest male player (losing fewest matches) in the Open Era to reach 200 clay-court wins (200–16).

He he, most weeks at nr two... Most of these records are about clay and being young.

Wimbledon 2003 — Australian Open 2010, 16 titles. Stands alone.
US Open 2008 — Australian Open 2010, Career Grand Slam. Rod Laver, Andre Agassi, Rafael Nadal.
Wimbledon 2003 — Australian Open 2010, 22 finals. Stands alone.
Wimbledon 2005 — US Open 2007, 10 consecutive finals. Stands alone.
Wimbledon 2004 — Australian Open 2010, 23 consecutive semi-finals. Stands alone.
Wimbledon 2004 — U.S. Open 2010, 26 consecutive quarter-finals. Stands alone.
2006 — 2007, 2 consecutive years winning 3+ titles. Stands alone.
2004 & 2006 — 2007, 3 years winning 3+ titles. Stands alone.
2004 — 2007, 4 consecutive years winning 2+ titles. Stands alone.
2004 — 2007 & 2009, 5 years winning 2+ titles. Stands alone.
2003–2010, 8 consecutive years winning 1+ title. Björn Borg, Pete Sampras.
Wimbledon 2003 — Australian Open 2006, First 7 finals won. Stands alone.
Australian Open 2004 — US Open 2010, 7 consecutive years winning 20+ matches. Ivan Lendl.
US Open 2006 — French Open 2007, 36 consecutive sets won. Stands alone.
US Open 2007, 35 consecutive service points won. Stands alone.
US Open 2007, $2.4 million earned at one event. Stands alone.
Wimbledon 2009, 50 aces in a final. Stands alone.
French Open 2004 — Wimbledon 2008, 18 consecutive No. 1 seeds. Stands alone.

Specific Grand Slams:
Australian Open 2004–2010, 4 titles overall. Andre Agassi.
Australian Open 2004 — 2010, 4 titles in 7 years. Stands alone.
Australian Open 2004–2007, 3 titles in 4 years. Andre Agassi.
Australian Open 2006–2007, 2 consecutive titles. Ken Rosewall, Guillermo Vilas, Johan Kriek, Mats Wilander, Stefan Edberg, Ivan Lendl, Jim Courier, Andre Agassi.
Australian Open 2004–2010, 5 finals overall. Stefan Edberg.
Australian Open 2004 — 2010, 7 consecutive semi-finals. Stands alone.
Australian Open 2007, Won without dropping a set. Ken Rosewall.
French Open 2006–2009, 4 consecutive finals. Björn Borg, Ivan Lendl, Rafael Nadal
French Open 2006–2008, 3 runner-ups. Guillermo Vilas.
French Open 2006 — 2008, 3 consecutive runner-ups. Stands alone.
French Open 2005 — 2009, 5 consecutive semi-finals. Stands alone.
Wimbledon 2003–2007, 5 consecutive titles. Björn Borg.
Wimbledon 2003–2009, 7 finals overall. Boris Becker, Pete Sampras.
Wimbledon 2003 — 2009, 7 consecutive finals. Stands alone.
Wimbledon 2003 — 2009, 7 consecutive semi-finals. Stands alone.
U.S. Open 2004–2008, 5 titles overall. Jimmy Connors, Pete Sampras.
U.S. Open 2004 — 2008, 5 consecutive titles. Stands alone.
U.S. Open 2004 — 2009, 40 consecutive match victories. Stands alone.

Other records:
2 February 2004 — 17 August 2008, 237 consecutive weeks at No.1. Stands alone.
October 2003 — January 2005, 26 consecutive match victories vs. top 10 opponents. Stands alone.
2005–2006, 56 consecutive hard court match victories. Stands alone.
2003–2008, 65 consecutive grass court match victories. Stands alone.
2003–2005, 24 consecutive tournament finals won. Stands alone.
2006, 94.12% of tournament finals reached in 1 season. Stands alone.
2005–2006, 2-season match winning percentage of 95.05%. Stands alone.
2004–2006, 3-season match winning percentage of 94.27%. Stands alone.
2004–2007, 4-season match winning percentage of 92.92%. Stands alone.
2003–2010, 5 ATP World Tour Finals titles. Ivan Lendl, Pete Sampras.
2007, $10 million earned in a season. Stands alone.
2002–2010, 29 Masters 1000 finals reached. Stands alone.
2005–2006, 29 consecutive Masters 1000 match victories. Stands alone.
2004–2008, 2 consecutive Olympic games as wire-to-wire No. 1. Stands alone.
2005–2007, 3 consecutive calendar years as wire-to-wire No. 1. Stands alone.
2005–2007, 3 calendar years as wire-to-wire No. 1. Jimmy Connors.

aphex
06-10-2011, 03:12 AM
Only lost one match in Grand Slam play after winning the first set.


http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lf1a0xREry1qbre5a.gif

Magnus
06-10-2011, 03:36 AM
Nadal will break Fed's record. He looks like a man an a mission and nobody can stop him. I don't really like Nadal a lot and especially after his behavior in the FO final, but Nadal is the kind of competitor that will not rest until he's done. Only thing that can stop him is a really bad injury. Nadal will eventually figure Novak out as well.

Arvid
06-10-2011, 04:18 AM
Well time will tell for sure, the one big thing that speaks against Feds goat claims as most people see it is that hes been so blatantly dominated by an other player, that in consideration its a little hard to call him as the op refers to him "the greatest man that walked the earth" ;-)

TennisBatman
06-10-2011, 05:08 AM
Nadal is not like Federer or Djokovic in making it a goal to surpass a certain "great" player in number of total grand slams...Rather, he emphasizes trying to be the winner of the next grand slam, whichever one it is, and regardless of how many he has right now.

Federer, on the other hand, became very distressed right after losing the AO final to Nadal, due to being on the verge of tying Sampras' record, and being stopped cold by Nadal. It took an injured Nadal in the French Open for that to happen.

Whereas Djokovic always looks too far into the future, regarding his status as a potential GOAT...but he never realizes the nature of reality in the present. It's much harder to focus on the present in the grand slams, and this is where his game lacks.

In that sense, for Nadal, it really doesn't matter how many grand slams he wins, but only whether he wins the next one.

Povl Carstensen
06-10-2011, 09:27 AM
(This explains why Rafa is underrated, when the less educated fans are criticizing any record involving clay. Of all the 30 or so records, only 2 are clay:

581 record in best-of-five-set matches on clay.

Quickest male player (losing fewest matches) in the Open Era to reach 200 clay-court wins (20016).

And the 81 match winning streak is a 'single-surface record'.

And by the way, Roland Garros is the most watched tennis event in the world-

http://simplymurcia.com/category/networks/
)

Actually four are solely about clay. And 6 only about age. And then theres ofcourse the best lefthander since Laver. That one is hard to beat for Federer.

TheMagicianOfPrecision
06-10-2011, 10:42 AM
I was standing directly in front of Fed after his practice session at the Aus Open in 09 until a fat security guard pushed me away. Though I made sure he heard me say I hope Rafa beats you again! LOL how it actually happened!

They let you leave your trailer-park and go to Australia??

Gorecki
06-10-2011, 11:47 AM
Rafa only needs to win WTF once, because he has so many other edges over Federer, like Olympic Singles Gold, Masters Shields - Rafa already has the record, and plenty of years left to rack up around 30 of them - and the head2head which is so lopsided it will be taken into account. Also all these records-

Only lost one match in Grand Slam play after winning the first set.

Only male player in the open era to win 21 consecutive grand slam matches within a calendar year
(French open 2010 - US Open 2010).

Lost only six sets in winning the three titles namely French Open, Wimbledon & US Open in 2010.

Nadal is the only player in the Open Era to win more than one ATP Tournament at least 6 times in his career.

Best career outdoor match winning percentage: 85.35% (466-80).

Winner of the most Golden Bagel Awards (3) in Open Era during the year 2005, 2008 and 2009.

Most consecutive weeks as World Number 2 than any player in the history of the computer rankings maintained by the
Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP): 160 weeks.

Most weeks at No.2: 189 weeks.

Quickest player to reach 400 wins by playing less than 500 matches (401-91).

Established a lead of 5245 points in October 2010, a record since the point values were doubled in 2009.

Nadal has earned the highest amount of prize money ever in a single season, $10,171,998, in 2010.

Winner of the 2010 Laureus Sportsman Award of the Year. Nadal had earlier won the 2006 Laureus Award for the
World Newcomer of the Year.

Only male player in history to win Roland Garros, Wimbledon and US Open in the same year on 3 different surfaces.

Tied the US Open serving record to become the 2nd player in history to only be broken 5 times (Roddick is the other).

Highest 5 set winning% of all-time.

Best Grand Slam Finals conversion rate in history of players to have won 5 slams or more.

Most Masters Shields Ever (19).

Only player ever to win 3 straight Masters Shields.

Youngest male in Open Era to win the Career Grand Slam.

Youngest male ever to win the Career Golden Grand Slam.

Winner of 28 consecutive Grand Slam sets in the year 2010 and 24 in 2008.

Only male to have won French Open, Wimbledon, and Olympic Gold Medal in the same year (2008 ).

Most singles titles won in a single season as a teenager: 11 (2005).

Won 24 consecutive matches, the longest winning streak of any teenager in the open era, in 2005.

Nadal joins Aussie legend Rod Laver as the only left-handers to win all four Grand Slams.

The only player to have lost just one game in an ATP World Tour Masters 1000 final (Monte Carlo 2010: 6-0, 6-1).

Longest single-surface winning streak in the Open Era: 81 matches (11 April 2005 - 20 May 2007).

31 consecutive match wins at Roland Garros.

581 record in best-of-five-set matches on clay.

Quickest male player (losing fewest matches) in the Open Era to reach 200 clay-court wins (20016).

http://d.emule.com/trivial-pursuit-genus-edition-deluxe-1-01-espanol/trivial-pursuit-genus-edition-deluxe-1-01-espanol-1.jpg

zagor
06-10-2011, 11:51 AM
Nadal will have to reverse his grass H2H against Tsonga and HC H2H against Davydenko.

TennisMD
06-10-2011, 11:53 AM
even if he could do it, he still wouldn't be in the same category as federer in the eyes of some people :)

Bottom line Nadal has more head to head wins over Federer. How can you be the greatest ever and being losing to your major rival, answer is you cannot

ernestsgulbisfan#1
06-10-2011, 11:56 AM
lol......:arrow::)

Gorecki
06-10-2011, 11:57 AM
http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1180/1144434295_c31c59e380.jpg


add the hairy chest to complete simian look

jackson vile
06-10-2011, 11:58 AM
http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1180/1144434295_c31c59e380.jpg


add the hairy chest to complete simian look


I thought that was a sweater!:shock:

CDestroyer
06-10-2011, 12:05 PM
Rafa only needs to win WTF once, because he has so many other edges over Federer, like Olympic Singles Gold, Masters Shields - Rafa already has the record, and plenty of years left to rack up around 30 of them - and the head2head which is so lopsided it will be taken into account. Also all these records-

Only lost one match in Grand Slam play after winning the first set.

Only male player in the open era to win 21 consecutive grand slam matches within a calendar year
(French open 2010 - US Open 2010).

Lost only six sets in winning the three titles namely French Open, Wimbledon & US Open in 2010.

Nadal is the only player in the Open Era to win more than one ATP Tournament at least 6 times in his career.

Best career outdoor match winning percentage: 85.35% (466-80).

Winner of the most Golden Bagel Awards (3) in Open Era during the year 2005, 2008 and 2009.

Most consecutive weeks as World Number 2 than any player in the history of the computer rankings maintained by the
Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP): 160 weeks.

Most weeks at No.2: 189 weeks.

Quickest player to reach 400 wins by playing less than 500 matches (401-91).

Established a lead of 5245 points in October 2010, a record since the point values were doubled in 2009.

Nadal has earned the highest amount of prize money ever in a single season, $10,171,998, in 2010.

Winner of the 2010 Laureus Sportsman Award of the Year. Nadal had earlier won the 2006 Laureus Award for the
World Newcomer of the Year.

Only male player in history to win Roland Garros, Wimbledon and US Open in the same year on 3 different surfaces.

Tied the US Open serving record to become the 2nd player in history to only be broken 5 times (Roddick is the other).

Highest 5 set winning% of all-time.

Best Grand Slam Finals conversion rate in history of players to have won 5 slams or more.

Most Masters Shields Ever (19).

Only player ever to win 3 straight Masters Shields.

Youngest male in Open Era to win the Career Grand Slam.

Youngest male ever to win the Career Golden Grand Slam.

Winner of 28 consecutive Grand Slam sets in the year 2010 and 24 in 2008.

Only male to have won French Open, Wimbledon, and Olympic Gold Medal in the same year (2008 ).

Most singles titles won in a single season as a teenager: 11 (2005).

Won 24 consecutive matches, the longest winning streak of any teenager in the open era, in 2005.

Nadal joins Aussie legend Rod Laver as the only left-handers to win all four Grand Slams.

The only player to have lost just one game in an ATP World Tour Masters 1000 final (Monte Carlo 2010: 6-0, 6-1).

Longest single-surface winning streak in the Open Era: 81 matches (11 April 2005 - 20 May 2007).

31 consecutive match wins at Roland Garros.

581 record in best-of-five-set matches on clay.

Quickest male player (losing fewest matches) in the Open Era to reach 200 clay-court wins (20016).


Copied and pasted from the fan who has his head the deepest in Rafas butt.

Mick
06-10-2011, 12:28 PM
Bottom line Nadal has more head to head wins over Federer. How can you be the greatest ever and being losing to your major rival, answer is you cannot

yeah but sports fans are not always rationale, especially the hardcore ones :)

Povl Carstensen
06-11-2011, 04:16 AM
Bottom line Nadal has more head to head wins over Federer. How can you be the greatest ever and being losing to your major rival, answer is you cannot
If your rival is not greater than you, you are still the greatest.

TheMagicianOfPrecision
06-11-2011, 04:30 AM
S0 a h2h advantage SOLELY taken on the dirt, weighs more than 16 GS compared to 10, and weighs more than 5 WTF:s compared to ...ehum cough cough*...0 !? Where is the logic in this?
Nadal fans are...well...:-?

Povl Carstensen
06-11-2011, 09:42 AM
No, just a select few of Nadal fans.

Nadalfan89
06-11-2011, 11:49 AM
Why do people put so much significance on WTF? It's a very fast court that suits only some players.

zagor
06-11-2011, 11:54 AM
Why do people put so much significance on WTF? It's a very fast court that suits only some players.

No,it's just low bouncing(you know the way grass was in the distant past)which relieves pressure on Fed's BH thus reducing the effectiveness of Nadal's main pattern of play.

Pink_Shirt
06-11-2011, 12:01 PM
That's not to say Federer won't win anymore!

Povl Carstensen
06-13-2011, 04:20 AM
Why do people put so much significance on RG? Its a slow bouncing, oh well....

Gorecki
06-13-2011, 04:40 AM
Why do female Serbian tennis pro's put so much significance on Vamos Rafa t-shirts? It's a very daft looking shirt that suits only some playboys!

tusharlovesrafa
06-13-2011, 05:13 AM
Why do female Serbian tennis pro's put so much significance on Vamos Rafa t-shirts? It's a very daft looking shirt that suits only some playboys!

You gave me a hard-on...:mrgreen:

Gorecki
06-13-2011, 05:38 AM
You gave me a hard-on...:mrgreen:

i respect you. but i dont swing that way!!!!

tusharlovesrafa
06-13-2011, 05:49 AM
i respect you. but i dont swing that way!!!!

Come on u guys are so developed..Just once ...for fun..

sbengte
06-13-2011, 07:29 AM
(Rafa will still be able to win slams in his 30s so it really doesn't matter how many he wins over the next 3 years)

No. Because Fed will not be around for too long to take out Djokovic and save Rafa from yet another final beatdown from the King.

(I was eagerly waiting for your new identity after this FO {the way you transformed from nadal_slam_king to bullz1lla after the AO disaster [ after having talked about Rafa's 6 in a row from FO 10 to Wim 11] }. I bet even you hadn't thought that Fed would gift his BFF Rafa with the best birthday gift ever on the FO semifinals day)

Sentinel
06-13-2011, 08:44 AM
(you are seriously thinking Dull will be around 6 years from now, playing, when he already feels like its 100 years)
(Maybe Dull been reading too much Marquez)

Gorecki
06-13-2011, 08:49 AM
(you are seriously thinking Dull will be around 6 years from now, playing, when he already feels like its 100 years)
(Maybe Dull been reading too much Marquez)

why you parentesinationizms of the sentence?

Sentinel
06-14-2011, 05:15 AM
why you parentesinationizms of the sentence?
(10 bullzills)

Gorecki
06-14-2011, 05:26 AM
(10 bullzills)

ROFL x LUKASROSOL