PDA

View Full Version : Federer's close shave on grass


tennisfan244
06-19-2011, 04:23 PM
Fed's close shave

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ynmKBFLmVWM

jukka1970
06-19-2011, 04:26 PM
That's so awesome !!!

Sid_Vicious
06-19-2011, 04:30 PM
That is amazing!! :) Thanks for poasting.

TennisFan3
06-19-2011, 05:29 PM
Brilliant!

jigar
06-19-2011, 05:51 PM
Cool. but waste of resources.

Cup8489
06-19-2011, 05:54 PM
*facepalm*

Wondering how much money they wasted on painting, and then shaving, a field.

AM95
06-19-2011, 06:23 PM
*facepalm*

Wondering how much money they wasted on painting, and then shaving, a field.

a lot.

but who can deny the ingenuity and creativity involved in creating this.

tennisenthusiast
06-19-2011, 06:40 PM
now I understand what is the single biggest source of global warming. 3000 litres of paint....are you kidding me??

TennisandMusic
06-19-2011, 06:42 PM
*facepalm*

Wondering how much money they wasted on painting, and then shaving, a field.

It's called "marketing" therefore it's not "wasting" the money.

I bet it makes you remember the brand more than just any other standard shaving commercial where a man looks closely in the mirror while rubbing his face.

Tammo
06-19-2011, 06:44 PM
even though i don't like Fed, that was amazing

pvaudio
06-19-2011, 06:44 PM
Cool. but waste of resources.

*facepalm*

Wondering how much money they wasted on painting, and then shaving, a field.
This is the first thing I said when the video was over. I'm a huge fan of his, and use their products, but what the hell? They wasted that much money and resources for that? I understand artwork, but that isn't exactly art.

Sid_Vicious
06-19-2011, 06:49 PM
This is the first thing I said when the video was over. I'm a huge fan of his, and use their products, but what the hell? They wasted that much money and resources for that? I understand artwork, but that isn't exactly art.

I am sure this cost Gillette a lot less than casting Henry, Federer, and Woods to show up in person and make a very generic and boring commerical like this :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v4ym1c4KRDc&feature=related

btw this was voted the worst commercial of 2008 in the UK.

pvaudio
06-19-2011, 06:54 PM
I am sure this cost Gillette a lot less than casting Henry, Federer, and Woods to show up in person and make a very generic and boring commerical like this :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v4ym1c4KRDc&feature=related

btw this was voted the worst commercial of 2008 in the UK.
I bet so. Difference here is that they didn't actually waste anything besides their money. In the new video, they're wasting money and the environment. That's pretty pathetic, and I'm not an ecomentalist by any stretch.

sdfedfans
06-20-2011, 03:46 AM
Haha brilliant! :)

Sentinel
06-20-2011, 04:01 AM
Totally AWE SOME dude !!!

jerriy
06-20-2011, 04:35 AM
*facepalm*

Wondering how much money they wasted on painting, and then shaving, a field.Hey clueless-cup, who said the money is wasted?

How do you know that they are not making money on it?

In fact guess what: you yourself have helped pay for the cost of that "money waste" (unless it is your mamma & pappa who're still paying for the things in your toilet cabinet).