PDA

View Full Version : Why is it that when Nadal loses early at a Slam, good things happen?


BreakPoint
07-06-2012, 11:23 PM
When Nadal lost early at the 2009 French Open, it finally opened the door for Federer to finally win the French Open and complete his career Slam after so many losses in the finals to Nadal.

Now, thanks to Nadal losing early, Murray makes his very first Wimbledon final and will have a chance to win his first Slam, as well as, be the first British man to win Wimbledon since the beginning of time. We will also be treated to an emotionally charged, equally-paired final with so much at stake for both players, and the crowd will be so much into this final like never before.

So let's give Nadal a round of applause for losing early. Thanks, Rafa! You couldn't have done more to give us a more interesting final. :)

darrinbaker00
07-07-2012, 12:05 AM
When Nadal lost early at the 2009 French Open, it finally opened the door for Federer to finally win the French Open and complete his career Slam after so many losses in the finals to Nadal.

Now, thanks to Nadal losing early, Murray makes his very first Wimbledon final and will have a chance to win his first Slam, as well as, be the first British man to win Wimbledon since the beginning of time. We will also be treated to an emotionally charged, equally-paired final with so much at stake for both players, and the crowd will be so much into this final like never before.

So let's give Nadal a round of applause for losing early. Thanks, Rafa! You couldn't have done more to give us a more interesting final. :)

Exactly how many times did Rafa turn you down for an autograph?

The-Champ
07-07-2012, 12:06 AM
I've said this before, everytime Nadal loses early, Federer gets the biggest benefit. I hope Murray can go out there and deny Federer another gift from Nadal's missfortune :D

WhiskeyEE
07-07-2012, 12:07 AM
Cheers to the frequent early exits for Nadal in the near future :razz:

BreakPoint
07-07-2012, 12:15 AM
Exactly how many times did Rafa turn you down for an autograph?
I've never asked Rafa for his autograph but I did turn him down for my autograph. :)

Sentinel
07-07-2012, 12:26 AM
I was actually thinking of thanking ROSOL but thought I'd wait till Monday for that :D

ViscaB
07-07-2012, 12:31 AM
Before the match Fed and Murray will have a hug to celebrate rafa's gift!

Tennis_Hands
07-07-2012, 03:01 AM
Before the match Fed and Murray will have a hug to celebrate rafa's gift!

They already send their warmest regards to the real reason for Nadal's defeat. The Good Doctor.

6-1 6-3 6-0
07-07-2012, 03:52 AM
When Federer lost early in a slam, good things happened too. In Roland Garros 2004, Federer losing early meant that we could have one of the epics of Roland Garros, Coria vs Gaudio, leading to Gaudio's first (and only) grand slam title. Federer losing in the QF of Roland Garros and Wimbledon 2010 meant that there was nothing in Nadal's way of becoming the youngest man to complete the career grand slam, and becoming the first (and only) man to win 3 consecutive grand slams on 3 different surfaces in a calendar year.
Federer losing early at the Australian Open 2003 gave Agassi his last slam. And Federer losing in the QF of Wimbledon 2001 gave Ivanisevic his lone grand slam. Add to that Federer's first-round exits at Wimbledon, where Sampras would win more Wimbledon titles (who won 7 titles in 8 attempts), and Hewitt would win his lone Wimbledon title.
Murray losing early at the US Open 2010 also gave us one of my favourite grand slam finals, Nadal vs Djokovic. Nadal won in 4 sets, being broken only 5 times in the entire tournament (he was first broken by Verdasco in the QF), a record shared with Andy Roddick.

NADALWON
07-07-2012, 04:09 AM
Why is it that when Nadal loses early at a Slam, good things happen?

Because you don't like Nadal? :shock:

6-1 6-3 6-0
07-07-2012, 04:13 AM
Because you don't like Nadal? :shock:

Unfortunately, this seems very common on here. :mad: People are forgetting that Nadal has the opportunity to set a large number of records (personal and official) in 2012-2013, and can continue to break more thereafter. :oops:

smash hit
07-07-2012, 09:09 AM
I've said this before, everytime Nadal loses early, Federer gets the biggest benefit. I hope Murray can go out there and deny Federer another gift from Nadal's missfortune :D

It's something that Federer and Murray have in common. They both have to rely on Rafa going out early so that they can fulfil a goal. Let's hope that Murray can take advantage of this gift.

Federererer
07-07-2012, 09:13 AM
Because you don't like Nadal? :shock:
Unfortunately, this seems very common on here. :mad: People are forgetting that Nadal has the opportunity to set a large number of records (personal and official) in 2012-2013, and can continue to break more thereafter. :oops:

LOL, the same poster replying to himself :) So obvious ***!

Start da Game
07-07-2012, 09:17 AM
When Nadal lost early at the 2009 French Open, it finally opened the door for Federer to finally win the French Open and complete his career Slam after so many losses in the finals to Nadal.

Now, thanks to Nadal losing early, Murray makes his very first Wimbledon final and will have a chance to win his first Slam, as well as, be the first British man to win Wimbledon since the beginning of time. We will also be treated to an emotionally charged, equally-paired final with so much at stake for both players, and the crowd will be so much into this final like never before.

So let's give Nadal a round of applause for losing early. Thanks, Rafa! You couldn't have done more to give us a more interesting final. :)

pet dogs eating the leftover in the meal plate of their master.......always a good thing.......

mistik
07-07-2012, 09:38 AM
Because Fed cant win against Nadal and he knows it.That even affects him in his semis and QF matches.

Clarky21
07-07-2012, 09:46 AM
Surprise,surprise another Breakpoint Nadal hating thread. BP must have nothing better to do it seems.

SwankPeRFection
07-07-2012, 09:55 AM
Because Fed cant win against Nadal and he knows it.That even affects him in his semis and QF matches.

I guess you forgot about the other win earlier this year and even the WTF at the end of last year. :rolleyes: Ya, I think the truth is that Nadal can't win against Fed unless he has a slow pusher court to work with.

WhiskeyEE
07-07-2012, 10:07 AM
I guess you forgot about the other win earlier this year and even the WTF at the end of last year. :rolleyes: Ya, I think the truth is that Nadal can't win against Fed unless he has a slow pusher court to work with.

He even has trouble on the slow pusher courts these days, as evidenced by their IW match in winter. Fed blew him and his pusher game away.

90's Clay
07-07-2012, 10:11 AM
Because Fed has proven for the past 5 years he can't get by the Nadal train on the big stage?? Federer knows he has the ability to have everyone's number at the slam exempt for Nadal.. Nadal is a different story.

Fed is almost always a guaranteed winner when Nadal isn't around.. He always takes advantage of the fact because the pressure is off, he can play more freely and he doesn't have to worry about Nadal lying in wait for him

mistik
07-07-2012, 10:12 AM
I guess you forgot about the other win earlier this year and even the WTF at the end of last year. :rolleyes: Ya, I think the truth is that Nadal can't win against Fed unless he has a slow pusher court to work with.

WTF isnt a major nor indian wells stop coming with moronic responses.

WhiskeyEE
07-07-2012, 10:18 AM
WTF isnt a major nor indian wells stop coming with moronic responses.

His point was that AO and RG are slow *** pusher courts. Which they are.

mistik
07-07-2012, 10:22 AM
His point was that AO and RG are slow *** pusher courts. Which they are.

He also lost to Nadal in Wimbledon as far as ı remember.

WhiskeyEE
07-07-2012, 10:25 AM
He also lost to Nadal in Wimbledon as far as ı remember.

And he beat him twice.

Towser83
07-07-2012, 10:28 AM
I've said this before, everytime Nadal loses early, Federer gets the biggest benefit. I hope Murray can go out there and deny Federer another gift from Nadal's missfortune :D

yes federer was the one in the same half of the draw as defending champ and world number one, novak djokovic. Are we forgetting Fed beat him? While Murray was actually in the half with no top 4 player any longer. Just like in 2009 when Nadal pulled out of Wimbledon and the 2 top seeds remaining (fed and Djokovic) ended up in the same half and Murray blew his easy chance to make the final.

The only difference is Federer made the most of his chances hen he got them.

Fed might not have had to play Nadal but neither has murray, so I hope Federer can deny Murray a gift. Fed at least has had to beat Djokovic.

mistik
07-07-2012, 10:29 AM
And he beat him twice.
But he couldnt even beat Rafa once in RG and he lost him 08 needed 5 sets 07.Did he even manage to put pressure on Rafa on RG NO.
Federer cant beat Nadal on a best 5 format on a major.He wont even beat Murray tommorow watch and see.

paulorenzo
07-07-2012, 10:42 AM
Because Fed has proven for the past 5 years he can't get by the Nadal train on the big stage?? Federer knows he has the ability to have everyone's number at the slam exempt for Nadal.. Nadal is a different story.

Fed is almost always a guaranteed winner when Nadal isn't around.. He always takes advantage of the fact because the pressure is off, he can play more freely and he doesn't have to worry about Nadal lying in wait for him


he wasn't guaranteed a winner at all in this year's championships. djokovic was expected to take federer out handily in the semis and he has yet to play murray.

rafa losing early will always make a tournament final easier for fed, since he wouldn't have to face rafa en route, but i disagree that he plays more freely when nadal is out of the tourney. aside from the final, i'll argue that he plays with more pressure knowing nadal is out and his chances of winning have increased. this year's wimby and FO 09 come to mind. as conjecture, if federer and nadal were to have met in the final this year, federer would have had a great chance of winning considering how he's playing in comparison to nadal.

BreakPoint
07-07-2012, 11:15 AM
Surprise,surprise another Breakpoint Nadal hating thread. BP must have nothing better to do it seems.
What "Nadal hate"? I love Nadal for the generous gift he has given to tennis fans, especially for those in the U.K. It's going to be one heck of a final tomorrow. :)

Thanks again for being so thoughtful and considerate, Rafa! You are the best and we love you for it. :)

Sentinel
07-07-2012, 11:23 AM
http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/images/icons/icon1.gif Why is it that when Nadal loses early at a Slam, good things happen?


What good has happened ? Has the crime rate reduced? Or has global warming reduced. Solar activity ? AIDS cure? Nadal picking? Please be specific.

atac
07-07-2012, 11:23 AM
Shouldn't be the case... the GOAT should be able to destroy a moonballing cheating butt-picking hack on all surfaces and have a winning record against such a clown and need not rely on other players playing over their head to clear his way for a title win, wait a minute...

SwankPeRFection
07-07-2012, 01:50 PM
WTF isnt a major nor indian wells stop coming with moronic responses.

Your post said nothing about it needing to be a major numbnuts. But I guess a win isn't a win unless it's in a major. :rolleyes:

BreakPoint
07-07-2012, 02:06 PM
http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/images/icons/icon1.gif Why is it that when Nadal loses early at a Slam, good things happen?


What good has happened ? Has the crime rate reduced? Or has global warming reduced. Solar activity ? AIDS cure? Nadal picking? Please be specific.
The world is all of a sudden a better place. :wink:

paulorenzo
07-07-2012, 02:49 PM
And he beat him twice.

thrice at wimby right?

DRII
07-07-2012, 03:06 PM
When Nadal lost early at the 2009 French Open, it finally opened the door for Federer to finally win the French Open and complete his career Slam after so many losses in the finals to Nadal.

Now, thanks to Nadal losing early, Murray makes his very first Wimbledon final and will have a chance to win his first Slam, as well as, be the first British man to win Wimbledon since the beginning of time. We will also be treated to an emotionally charged, equally-paired final with so much at stake for both players, and the crowd will be so much into this final like never before.

So let's give Nadal a round of applause for losing early. Thanks, Rafa! You couldn't have done more to give us a more interesting final. :)

You realize, you're basically saying Nadal has to lose early to let the other top guys win.

Nice compliment, Nadal sends his gratitude!

Clarky21
07-07-2012, 03:27 PM
You realize, you're basically saying Nadal has to lose early to let the other top guys win.

Nice compliment, Nadal sends his gratitude!



Nice catch. :lol:

BreakPoint
07-07-2012, 03:35 PM
You realize, you're basically saying Nadal has to lose early to let the other top guys win.

Nice compliment, Nadal sends his gratitude!
Yes, of course I realize that's what I'm saying. Isn't it obvious? No need to be a rocket scientist to understand what I'm saying.

That's why I'm thanking Nadal for losing early. Or else we wouldn't have this incredible final set up for tomorrow.

Thank you, thank you, thank you, Rafa!! :)

BreakPoint
07-07-2012, 03:36 PM
Nice catch. :lol:
Did you JUST realize that? I guess reading comprehension is not your strong suit. :(

WhiskeyEE
07-07-2012, 03:49 PM
Nadal finally got a harder than average draw and, to no surprise, he lost early.

Thank the ITF (or lady luck if you so choose), not Nadal.

Clarky21
07-07-2012, 03:53 PM
Did you JUST realize that? I guess reading comprehension is not your strong suit. :(



Obviously you not only have reading comprehension problems,but foot in mouth disease as well considering you're the one who started this thread. Doesn't say much about your supposed intelligence does it,Poly?

TMF
07-07-2012, 04:00 PM
All England Club are incredibly thrill because the rating for the final is going to high. The ticket prices for the best seats are range from $4000 to $9000! It's like game 7 of the NBA final in the USA.

BreakPoint
07-07-2012, 08:00 PM
Obviously you not only have reading comprehension problems,but foot in mouth disease as well considering you're the one who started this thread. Doesn't say much about your supposed intelligence does it,Poly?
OMG, you just contradicted yourself in a single sentence. But I don't expect you to understand that. If I'm the OP and wrote the OP, why would I need to read and comprehend the OP?

You seem to think you caught me at something - that I didn't realize I did something. That's where you failed reading comprehension.

The point of this thread is that Murray had little chance of making the final if Nadal had not lost early and that Federer has little chance of winning the title if Nadal had not lost early. Nothing could be more obvious that that's what I'm saying. But it went right over your head, didn't it? :oops:

Clarky21
07-07-2012, 08:14 PM
OMG, you just contradicted yourself in a single sentence. But I don't expect you to understand that. If I'm the OP and wrote the OP, why would I need to read and comprehend the OP?

You seem to think you caught me at something - that I didn't realize I did something. That's where you failed reading comprehension.

The point of this thread is that Murray had little chance of making the final if Nadal had not lost early and that Federer has little chance of winning the title if Nadal had not lost early. Nothing could be more obvious that that's what I'm saying. But it went right over your head, didn't it? :oops:


I didn't catch you doing anything. DRII is the one who pointed out your idiocy,and now you want to pretend like you meant it to come across that way the whole time to save face. I also think you're full of crap,and posted this bs thread just to get more attention. Just like you always do.



Anyway,keep talking,Poly. I'm just sitting back laughing at the likes of you,so keep it coming. :lol:

Sentinel
07-07-2012, 08:32 PM
The world is all of a sudden a better place. :wink:
Agreed, but the "reading comprehension" of several posters before me certainly hasn't improved. That would be a really good thing :D

BreakPoint
07-07-2012, 08:33 PM
I didn't catch you doing anything. DRII is the one who pointed out your idiocy,and now you want to pretend like you meant it to come across that way the whole time to save face. I also think you're full of crap,and posted this bs thread just to get more attention. Just like you always do.



Anyway,keep talking,Poly. I'm just sitting back laughing at the likes of you,so keep it coming. :lol:
Wow, keep proving to us how you failed remedial reading.

My point was blatantly obvious to everyone else reading my OP. You must be the only one that had it go right over your head. :oops:

How else would Nadal losing early allow Murray to make the final if I think Murray would have beaten Nadal in the semis anyway? What difference would Nadal losing early have made in that case? And what do you think having an "equally-paired final" means? It means if it were a Nadal-Federer final, Nadal would have been the overwhelming favorite. But because he lost early, we can now enjoy an "equally-paired final". I know, all this must be too much for your simplistic mind to comprehend.

Clarky21
07-07-2012, 08:39 PM
Wow, keep proving to us how you failed remedial reading.

My point was blatantly obvious to everyone else reading my OP. You must be the only one that had it go right over your head. :oops:

How else would Nadal losing early allow Murray to make the final if I think Murray would have beaten Nadal in the semis anyway? What difference would Nadal losing early have made in that case? And what do you think having an "equally-paired final" means? It means if it were a Nadal-Federer final, Nadal would have been the overwhelming favorite. But because he lost early, we can now enjoy an "equally-paired final". I know, all this must be too much for your simplistic mind to comprehend.



Shouldn't you be starting more threads about how you would like to send us all back to the stone ages with your brilliant ideas,Poly? Your genius never ceases to astound me. I mean Nadal never would have managed to win one 250 tournament in BFE against 1.0's from down at the local weekend warrior club if not for poly strings huh,Poly? :lol:

tlm
07-07-2012, 08:40 PM
When Nadal lost early at the 2009 French Open, it finally opened the door for Federer to finally win the French Open and complete his career Slam after so many losses in the finals to Nadal.

Now, thanks to Nadal losing early, Murray makes his very first Wimbledon final and will have a chance to win his first Slam, as well as, be the first British man to win Wimbledon since the beginning of time. We will also be treated to an emotionally charged, equally-paired final with so much at stake for both players, and the crowd will be so much into this final like never before.

So let's give Nadal a round of applause for losing early. Thanks, Rafa! You couldn't have done more to give us a more interesting final. :)

Well it is pretty obvious that if rafa is not there then that saves fed from being beat on by rafa again.

Clarky21
07-07-2012, 08:43 PM
Agreed, but the "reading comprehension" of several posters before me certainly hasn't improved. That would be a really good thing :D



The thing is I didn't even read his entire original post. I can't take someone like him seriously after reading his blather in the "BAN POLY STRINGS NOW!!" thread. Besides,I responded to what DRII said because I thought it was funny. Nothing more nothing less,Sentigif.

Clarky21
07-07-2012, 08:44 PM
Well it is pretty obvious that if rafa is not there then that saves fed from being beat on by rafa again.


You're just wasting your time on Poly. He is just trying to cover up his nonsense with more nonsense. He meant exactly what he said in the thread title and he knows it.

Oh,and Poly string is the Debil!!!

Clay lover
07-07-2012, 08:46 PM
You hate him and you love Federer, friggin face it. No need to be all diplomatic and eloquent. You know who you are, quit playing stupid games.

Stubborn old farts who think they are smart p*ss me off, seriously.

BreakPoint
07-07-2012, 08:47 PM
Well it is pretty obvious that if rafa is not there then that saves fed from being beat on by rafa again.
Exactly! Somehow that simple fact went right over Clarky's head.

BreakPoint
07-07-2012, 08:49 PM
Your genius never ceases to astound me.
Yes, you share the same sentiment with just about everyone I come into contact with. :)

tlm
07-07-2012, 08:50 PM
Exactly! Somehow that simple fact went right over Clarky's head.

Okay well at least you are honest.

Clarky21
07-07-2012, 08:50 PM
You hate him and you love Federer, friggin face it. No need to be all diplomatic and eloquent. You know who you are, quit playing stupid games.

Stubborn old farts who think they are smart p*ss me off, seriously.


The bolded describes Poly perfectly.

BreakPoint
07-07-2012, 08:51 PM
You hate him and you love Federer, friggin face it. No need to be all diplomatic and eloquent. You know who you are, quit playing stupid games.

Stubborn old farts who think they are smart p*ss me off, seriously.
I love Nadal even more when he loses early and allows others to make the final. :)

BreakPoint
07-07-2012, 08:54 PM
Okay well at least you are honest.
I'm always honest. :)

Nadal is a far worse match-up for Federer than Federer is for Nadal. Who doesn't know that?

15_ounce
07-07-2012, 08:54 PM
Good things happen, because the bad things disappear. No more time violations, no more on court coaching, no more loud grunting on top of your lung, no more Parera makarena.

Clarky21
07-07-2012, 08:58 PM
Yes, you share the same sentiment with just about everyone I come into contact with. :)



You greatly overestimate your mental prowess,Poly.


Oh,and do you think Nadal would be able to beat 1.0's down at the local weekend warrior club if they banned poly strings?

Sentinel
07-07-2012, 09:29 PM
The thing is I didn't even read his entire original post. I can't take someone like him seriously after reading his blather in the "BAN POLY STRINGS NOW!!" thread. Besides,I responded to what DRII said because I thought it was funny. Nothing more nothing less,Sentigif.
Quit getting baited, Clarky :D

Clarky21
07-07-2012, 09:49 PM
Quit getting baited, Clarky :D



You're right,Sentigif. I should know better considering the thread starter. :)