PDA

View Full Version : Which defending champion will lose their title in 2013?


seattle_1hander
09-29-2012, 03:14 PM
DJOKOVIC....I CHOOSE YOU!!!!

Australian: Murray or Berdych
French: Nadal
Wimbledon: Federer
US Open: Murray

Tammo
09-29-2012, 03:16 PM
Federer 1st likely
Djokoivic 2nd
Murray 3rd
Nadal (if he plays) 4th

kaku
09-29-2012, 04:18 PM
Fed is the most likely I think. I'm also picking Novak to win the French next year :)

flyinghippos101
09-29-2012, 04:29 PM
Order of likelihood, from greatest to least

1. Fed
2. Murray
3. Djokovic
4. Nadal

kishnabe
09-29-2012, 04:40 PM
1.Murray( Too many Variables at the US Open)
2.Federer( Getting too old....but still the best at Wimbledon....though the other 3 are closet than before)
3.Djokovic ( Aussie suits him too well)
4. Nadal (Clay)

Ico
09-29-2012, 04:42 PM
Murray is the most likely not to defend (can't expect winds like that every year).
Then Federer because of age, slowing grass, and potential big servers in his draw.
Then Djokovic because his form has slipped a bit (I think Murray will take it and send everyone into a tizzy).
Then Nadal, because he is a masterful clay specialist. Even if he misses the AO, he should be back for clay.

Clarky21
09-29-2012, 04:53 PM
Nadal.


10gimpyknees

Big_Dangerous
09-29-2012, 04:59 PM
I'm in the minority but I really don't see Djokovic winning the Australian Open for a 3rd straight year. Very tough to win 3 straight Aussie Opens.


1. Djokovic
2. Federer
3. Murray
4. Nadal

tacou
09-29-2012, 05:07 PM
I think AO will be a semi-surprise winner, whether that's a dark horse Berdych/Del Po or a dominant Murray.

I could see Federer getting a slam next season, but it could really come anywhere he puts together 2 weeks of his best tennis.

Nadal is too up in the air right now to even predict, and who knows what the year will look like come USO 2013?

AnotherTennisProdigy
09-29-2012, 05:58 PM
Rafa is the wild card here.

NadalAgassi
09-29-2012, 06:13 PM
In order of likelihood to lose their titles:

1. Federer (he will be going on 32, wont be easy to win anymore slams anywhere, but then again grass field isnt as strong. Still Murray, healthy Nadal, Berdych, Tsonga are all threats to him and Murray, Nadal, and maybe Djokovic all title threats as well)

2. Murray (more competition at U.S Open than Wimbledon, but I see Murray being stronger going forward than Olderer). I dont see either repeating though, I have a feeling Murray is more likely to win one (or both) of the Australian and/or Wimbledon than the U.S Open next year.

3. Djokovic. This is his best event. Odds on favorite to win and cement himself the best Australian Open player in history with a win in January.

4. Nadal. Unless he retires he will most likely win the French as usual.

MichaelNadal
09-29-2012, 06:17 PM
I don't think Federer will win Wimby next year.

Mustard
09-29-2012, 06:17 PM
I'm in the minority but I really don't see Djokovic winning the Australian Open for a 3rd straight year. Very tough to win 3 straight Aussie Opens.

It hasn't been done in the open era. The last time it was done was back in the amateur era when Roy Emerson won the title 6 times and 5 in a row (1961, 1963, 1964, 1965, 1966, 1967).

WhiskeyEE
09-29-2012, 06:36 PM
Murray
Naduck
Fed
Djokovic

NadalAgassi
09-29-2012, 07:15 PM
I think if Djokovic wins the Australian Open he will have to be considered the best ever there. He, Agassi, and Federer would all have 4 titles. However Djokovic would be the only one to win 3 in a row, thus display that level of dominance. As much as I love Agassi and do believe he is an amazing rebound ace and Australian Open player he also won in a couple extremely soft years in 2001 and 2003. Meanwhile Djokovic's 2 straight set smackdowns of Federer are hard to completely ignore either.

jaggy
09-29-2012, 07:26 PM
What about Cincy?

WhiskeyEE
09-30-2012, 02:41 AM
I think if Djokovic wins the Australian Open he will have to be considered the best ever there. He, Agassi, and Federer would all have 4 titles. However Djokovic would be the only one to win 3 in a row, thus display that level of dominance. As much as I love Agassi and do believe he is an amazing rebound ace and Australian Open player he also won in a couple extremely soft years in 2001 and 2003. Meanwhile Djokovic's 2 straight set smackdowns of Federer are hard to completely ignore either.

I don't think you can crown anyone the best of any tournament. Aussie Open is just a name. The most you can do is argue that he's the best plexipave player ever. The tournament plays a lot different than it did a few years ago.

6-1 6-3 6-0
09-30-2012, 02:43 AM
Good to see most people agree that Nadal will become the first player in Open Era history to win at least one slam per year for 9 consecutive years. That makes Nadal a master of longevity.

vive le beau jeu !
09-30-2012, 02:43 AM
Nadal.


10gimpyknees
let's hope you're right.

Sabratha
09-30-2012, 03:32 AM
I don't think Nadal will be able to defend his title, I believe Djokovic will lose his, Federer will lose his in a rematch of this year's final, and Murray will lose his to Djokovic in another rematch of this year's final.

ledwix
09-30-2012, 04:08 AM
Estimated chances of winning: Djokovic AO 45%. Nadal RG 60% (would say higher but hasn't played in a while). Federer Wimbledon 35%. Murray USO 30% so I would guess Murray, but he has a shot at winning AO or Wimb next year for sure. Overall everyone's titles seem pretty vulnerable.

ledwix
09-30-2012, 04:12 AM
Good to see most people agree that Nadal will become the first player in Open Era history to win at least one slam per year for 9 consecutive years. That makes Nadal a master of longevity.

Nah dude, Nadal is no master of longevity at all as he benefited mainly from the weakest clay era in world history since 3.115 billion years back and can't even play 10 consecutive slams let alone make 10 consecutive grand slam finals or even finish #1 a mere two consecutive years like Djokovic will.

Rock Strongo
09-30-2012, 04:47 AM
All of them.

10donaldsforcygs