PDA

View Full Version : Players who have an aura of invincibility against Federer


SQA333
10-13-2012, 05:55 AM
The list is growing. Previously it was only Nadal.

Now it's Nadal, Djokovic, Murray, Simon and Berdych.

Warmaster
10-13-2012, 06:21 AM
Indeed, by losing his last two matches against Federer, Djokovic' aura of invincibility is growing and growing!

Good post.

TopFH
10-13-2012, 06:26 AM
Only Nadal has one. Federer has won 3 of the last 4 vs. Murray, the last 2 vs. Simon and Djokovic.

augustobt
10-13-2012, 06:29 AM
Simon? This is a joke?

sureshs
10-13-2012, 06:35 AM
It is inevitable as Fed grows older but still continues to play. Even I am going to have an aura of invincibility against him pretty soon.

rofl_copter3
10-13-2012, 06:44 AM
Simon??? The guy had one good clay court year against Fed and you're calling him invincible?

dominikk1985
10-13-2012, 06:49 AM
The list is growing. Previously it was only Nadal.

Now it's Nadal, Djokovic, Murray, Simon and Berdych.

fed is 2-2 vs simon both of those losses came in 08 when fed had mono.
against berdych fed is still up 11-5. and fed also leads the h2h against novak including a win at wimbledon and the win at the FO that cost novak the GS in 2011 (no way nadal had beaten novak after taking that many beatings on clay).

he did lose occasionally to those but only because fed is slowing down the last 2-3 years.

joeri888
10-13-2012, 06:51 AM
HAHAHHAHAHAHA. NOBODY has an aura of invincibility against Federer. Nadal, Djokovic, Murray and Berdych all lost to Federer this year.

tennis_pro
10-13-2012, 06:54 AM
oops wrong thread

augustobt
10-13-2012, 06:59 AM
I'm really thinking if anyone seriously think that Simon has an aura of invincibility against Federer.

dangalak
10-13-2012, 07:01 AM
Why is the OP not banned? He is the most blatant troll I have ever seen.

tennisaddict
10-13-2012, 07:06 AM
Butthurt because you need something to counter
- 17 slams
- 21 major
- 6 WTF
- 300 weeks at No 1.
- 23 cons grand slam semis
- 38 cons grandslam quarters
..
...

....

.......

.................

TMF
10-13-2012, 08:45 AM
The list is growing. Previously it was only Nadal.

Now it's Nadal, Djokovic, Murray, Simon and Berdych.

Only Nadal and Murray has the positive h2h over Roger, not Nole, simon or Berdych. Using your logic, if Nadal/Murray has aura of invincibility over Roger, Then Roddick has the aura of invincibility over Nole, same for Davy over Nadal.

TMF
10-13-2012, 08:47 AM
Why is the OP not banned? He is the most blatant troll I have ever seen.

If they don't ban him later I'll have to put him on my ignore list since that's the only option.

Gonzo_style
10-13-2012, 08:47 AM
Simon??? The guy had one good clay court year against Fed and you're calling him invincible?

:):):):) When was that happen??????????????

NadalAgassi
10-13-2012, 08:48 AM
Nadal on all outdoor courts, Murray in all non clay Masters, and Nalbandian anytime he is in form. That is it.

No1e
10-13-2012, 08:49 AM
Why is the OP not banned? He is the most blatant troll I have ever seen.

Disagreed. I bet you have never seen yourself before.

Gonzo_style
10-13-2012, 08:50 AM
I'm really thinking if anyone seriously think that Simon has an aura of invincibility against Federer.


Simon played good against Federer, but aura of invincibility.....HELL NO!

DragonBlaze
10-13-2012, 08:51 AM
Nadal on all outdoor courts, Murray in all non clay Masters, and Nalbandian anytime he is in form. That is it.

Nalbandian?! What a random addition lol.

NadalAgassi
10-13-2012, 08:55 AM
Nalbandian?! What a random addition lol.

Nalbandian's best tennis > Federer's best. Too bad he only brings it on rare occasions. Remember though Federer was Nalbandian's slave for awhile, even in 2003 when he was already coming into his prime. Remember their 2 matches in late 2007 when Nalbandian's form was cooking again, and the 2005 WTF, even prime Federer does not want to see a fit and in form Nalbandian on the other side of the net, fortunately like the rest of the ATP he doesnt have to worry about that much.

DragonBlaze
10-13-2012, 09:02 AM
Nalbandian's best tennis > Federer's best. Too bad he only brings it on rare occasions. Remember though Federer was Nalbandian's slave for awhile, even in 2003 when he was already coming into his prime. Remember their 2 matches in late 2007 when Nalbandian's form was cooking again, and the 2005 WTF, even prime Federer does not want to see a fit and in form Nalbandian on the other side of the net, fortunately like the rest of the ATP he doesnt have to worry about that much.

Ok let's take your initial premise to be true (which it's clearly not), the very fact that Nalby shows up once in a blue moon would mean that he cannot have an "aura of invincibilty", the only way you can get such an aura is through showing at least some measure of consistency.

pvaudio
10-13-2012, 09:03 AM
Nadal on all outdoor courts, Murray in all non clay Masters, and Nalbandian anytime he is in form. That is it.
By the Nalbandian logic, I could beat Federer when I'm "in form". Nalbandian is only a threat to linesmen.

Cup8489
10-13-2012, 09:04 AM
Not sure if serious? Federer has beaten them ALL this year...

TMF
10-13-2012, 09:10 AM
A good example of an aura of invincibility is Borg has over Gerulaitis and Fed has over Roddick. Federer has no one over him. The OP doesn't know what he's talking about.

underground
10-13-2012, 09:12 AM
By adding Simon to the list this is officially the worst troll thread.

President
10-13-2012, 09:20 AM
Even nowadays with old Roger, Nadal is the only player who I can truly say Federer is a true underdog against. I don't consider Djokovic and Murray (in majors) to be favorites over him most of the time, given equal form.

Ironically his second worst matchup on tour these days is probably Berdych, the guy just reads Fed's serve so well and is able to take his time away better than any other player.

tennis_pro
10-13-2012, 09:56 AM
By the Nalbandian logic, I could beat Federer when I'm "in form". Nalbandian is only a threat to linesmen.

haha brilliant post, hope you don't mind if I use it as a sig

90's Clay
10-13-2012, 10:07 AM
I only consider Nadal to be really "invincible" over Federer and the clear favorite in the outdoor courts..

Until Murray can actually beat Roger at a slam, I don't consider him a favorite..

I suppose you can add Djoker as the favorite over Fed in places like Australia. Djoker on his game there IMO is a better player in Australia then Fed was on his game even in his prime years IMO


I could actually see Djoker becoming the AO GOAT in the next few years.. Barring his doesn't have a complete meltdown. Djoker already might be the best player Ive ever seen play Australia (if you look at his 2011 form anyways).

ATXtennisaddict
10-13-2012, 10:11 AM
Fed's 31. Not even the greatest athletes escape age.

beast of mallorca
10-13-2012, 10:12 AM
Why is the OP not banned? He is the most blatant troll I have ever seen.

Disagreed. I bet you have never seen yourself before.

Haha, big burn. :twisted:

Gonzo_style
10-13-2012, 10:19 AM
Fed's 31. Not even the greatest athletes escape age.

If you watch football, you would know that Zidane was the best player in Germany 2006 in 34 years! And Zidane is of course one of the best players ever!

kalyan4fedever
10-13-2012, 10:20 AM
cut the guy a break, he cant win everything. Whenever he loses sad to see hiding trolls come out to create useless threads. He is still played awesome in todays match, just some sloppy breaks were handed over and unable to find his serve.

Prisoner of Birth
10-13-2012, 10:26 AM
If you watch football, you would know that Zidane was the best player in Germany 2006 in 34 years! And Zidane is of course one of the best players ever!

If you use your brain, you would know that Tennis isn't Football and Football isn't Tennis! And Tennis, Football are of course two of the best sports ever!

ATXtennisaddict
10-13-2012, 10:27 AM
If you watch football, you would know that Zidane was the best player in Germany 2006 in 34 years! And Zidane is of course one of the best players ever!

I don't want to insult your intelligence so I won't say anything else.

Gonzo_style
10-13-2012, 10:29 AM
If you use your brain, you would know that Tennis isn't Football and Football isn't Tennis! And Tennis, Football are of course two of the best sports ever!

If you have a eyes you would see what "ATXtennis addict" wrote! :evil:

TMF
10-13-2012, 10:29 AM
I only consider Nadal to be really "invincible" over Federer and the clear favorite in the outdoor courts..


Nadal can't be invincible if he can't beat 31 years old Fed at IW(slow outdoor). And the way Fed play at Cinci., Nadal would never beat him there.

Prisoner of Birth
10-13-2012, 10:30 AM
If you have a eyes you would see what "ATXtennis addict" wrote! :evil:

But I don't have "a eyes" :???: I just have "eyes".

Gonzo_style
10-13-2012, 10:30 AM
I don't want to insult your intelligence so I won't say anything else.

Say something please!

Gonzo_style
10-13-2012, 10:32 AM
But I don't have "a eyes" :???: I just have "eyes".

Use them please!

Prisoner of Birth
10-13-2012, 10:33 AM
Use them please!

Okay, I'll use "them".

Them athletes are awesome, Dawg!

There, I used "them".

Gonzo_style
10-13-2012, 10:38 AM
Okay, I'll use "them".

Them athletes are awesome, Dawg!

There, I used "them".

He wrote best athletes, ok, not best tennis players!

And i'm not from english-speaking country, SO WHAT? Lethal injection for me because i making mistakes?

TMF
10-13-2012, 10:38 AM
Say something please!

Use them please!

You don't have to get mad if someone disagree with you.

And I do believe Fed at 31 loses some of his athleticism, that's just about for any tennis player at that age.

Gonzo_style
10-13-2012, 10:42 AM
You don't have to get mad if someone disagree with you.

And I do believe Fed at 31 loses some of his athleticism, that's just about for any tennis player at that age.

I agree with you on that, but "ATCtennis addict" wrote "best athletes" not best tennis players, so i mentioned Zidane.