PDA

View Full Version : Disappointing rackets for 2005


barry
12-30-2005, 07:48 AM
My biggest disapointment in new rackets this year was the Head Flexpoint Tour. Shoulder and wrist problem after 2 hours of play.
Not an issue with the O3 Tour.

fishuuuuu
12-30-2005, 07:52 AM
They changed the Radical from it's true 18 x 20 roots too!

Marius_Hancu
12-30-2005, 08:08 AM
My biggest disapointment in new rackets this year was the Head Flexpoint Tour. Shoulder and wrist problem after 2 hours of play.

Not an issue with the O3.

you mean, the O3 Tour?
good to know.

progman_2000
12-30-2005, 08:11 AM
you mean, the O3 Tour?
good to know.

Since my biggest disappointment is the O3 Red, I am assuming also he is talking about the O3 Tour!

barry
12-30-2005, 08:16 AM
Since my biggest disappointment is the O3 Red, I am assuming also he is talking about the O3 Tour!

Yes I meant the O3 tour, it played better than the Flexpoint Tour.

bounce-hit
12-30-2005, 08:17 AM
My biggest disapointment in new rackets this year was the Head Flexpoint Tour. Shoulder and wrist problem after 2 hours of play.
Not an issue with the O3 Tour.


The Flexpoint Tour hurt my shoulder also, which I didn't expect given its stiffness rating. I also wasn't crazy about the Aeropro Control Plus, which was a very uncomfortable hit.

Marius_Hancu
12-30-2005, 08:22 AM
The Flexpoint Tour hurt my shoulder also, which I didn't expect given its stiffness rating. I also wasn't crazy about the Aeropro Control Plus, which was a very uncomfortable hit.

The only thing I can find in the specs:

Flexpoint Tour
Strung Weight: 12oz / 340g
Balance: 8pts Head Light
Swingweight: 324
Stiffness: 58
Beam Width: 21 mm Straight Beam
Composition: LiquidMetal Titanium / Graphite and Piezzo Electric Fibers

is that Titanium.

I tend to avoid it.

Even if the stiffness is not high, I am not sure how the vibration spectrum is modified by its presence.

BLiND
12-30-2005, 08:44 AM
Prince Diablo XP
Head Flexpoint Radical

DXS
12-30-2005, 08:50 AM
Babolat APD+ (could not feel the ball on the strings no matter how I set it up)

peter
12-30-2005, 09:05 AM
Dunlop Maxply McEnroe

For me that is (but then I hasn't tested that many rackets this year). I had read a number of posters saying that it was a good racket, but when I tested the one I bought (dirt cheap so I'm not too annoyed :-) I rather quickly noticed the vibrations when going all-out with that one. It's good at the net though.

kumat63
12-30-2005, 09:14 AM
The only thing I can find in the specs:

Flexpoint Tour
Strung Weight: 12oz / 340g
Balance: 8pts Head Light
Swingweight: 324
Stiffness: 58
Beam Width: 21 mm Straight Beam
Composition: LiquidMetal Titanium / Graphite and Piezzo Electric Fibers

is that Titanium.

I tend to avoid it.

Even if the stiffness is not high, I am not sure how the vibration spectrum is modified by its presence.

Yeah, but the LM Prestige has LM Titanium too and I find that a very soft and comfortable feeling racquet despite being rated stiffer than the FP. It is a mystery why so many find the FP Radical to hurt the arm--could it be the Flexpoint thing?

pro_staff
12-30-2005, 10:11 AM
APD+ and O3 tour

DANMAN
12-30-2005, 11:01 AM
Head flexpoint radical again

Muse
12-30-2005, 12:43 PM
Aeropro Control. I thought the Aeropro Drive was a respectable racquet so I expected good things from the Control. It just felt like a club.

thejuice
12-30-2005, 01:35 PM
Dunlop Maxply McEnroe

For me that is (but then I hasn't tested that many rackets this year). I had read a number of posters saying that it was a good racket, but when I tested the one I bought (dirt cheap so I'm not too annoyed :-) I rather quickly noticed the vibrations when going all-out with that one. It's good at the net though.

Did you put a vibration stopper on the strings? I think the Maxply is a great stick and doesn't have any vibrations with a vibe dampener.

peter
12-30-2005, 02:04 PM
Did you put a vibration stopper on the strings? I think the Maxply is a great stick and doesn't have any vibrations with a vibe dampener.

At first I tried it without the dampener (I normally play without those on my Wilson PS6.0-85 rackets - and also now on the Dunlop HM 200G that I bought at the same time with the McEnroe) - it was horrible! It's slightly better with the dampener but not perfect.

But it might be due to how I hit my groundies (hard, pretty flat). If I backed off a bit on the power then the racket was better though. And very fast and responsive at the net! (Too bad I mostly camp at the baseline though :-)

bagung
12-30-2005, 02:14 PM
o3 red..... the biggest disapointment

kreative
12-30-2005, 11:57 PM
i felt that the m-fil 200g was a dissappointment, just like the hm before it. also had high hopes for the apd, but just felt so boardy to me.

jonolau
12-31-2005, 12:55 AM
Head Flexpoint Tour.

When I first bought it, I thought it would be quite close to my C10 Pro. But everything was out of whack and was tempted to flog it off at half price.

However, I experimented with increased swingweight and now it's my main racquet.

So, a happy ending to a tragic beginning.

ssjkyle31
12-31-2005, 06:04 AM
Ncode90 when compared to the tour90

joe1987
12-31-2005, 08:13 AM
N series. Where did all those great hammers go???

Rabbit
12-31-2005, 08:39 AM
Snauwaert Ergonom, I really thought this one would take off...

dannyjjang
12-31-2005, 09:17 AM
how much lead did u apply? jonalu?

jck01
12-31-2005, 10:17 AM
Head Flexpoint Tour.

When I first bought it, I thought it would be quite close to my C10 Pro. But everything was out of whack and was tempted to flog it off at half price.

However, I experimented with increased swingweight and now it's my main racquet.



That's what happened with my Volkl C10 ProTour. I didn't like it. It felt too head-light. The volleys were okay but it didn't have the punch that I was used to having. My serves were very weak. But, after I put lead tape on the racquet it feels terrific, except for the serve, which I'm still working on by putting more lead tape on the racquet. :-)

mctennis
12-31-2005, 11:55 AM
jck01, I'll buy that horrible C10 PT from you. You probably need a good racquet instead of that horrible C10 PT. Let me know what you'll get rid of it for. I'll take it off your hands. I need something to beat my rugs with.

Da One
12-31-2005, 12:18 PM
M-Fil 200, O3 Tour, O3 Red

brian.sat
01-01-2006, 09:30 AM
Most disappointed is O3 tour, even I didn't have any expectation after POG.
Flexpoint Radical Tour is by far the best. Best for old-school players who can generate enough power.

The Pusher Terminator
01-01-2006, 10:50 AM
Dunlop Maxply McEnroe

For me that is (but then I hasn't tested that many rackets this year). I had read a number of posters saying that it was a good racket, but when I tested the one I bought (dirt cheap so I'm not too annoyed :-) I rather quickly noticed the vibrations when going all-out with that one. It's good at the net though.

I jusr ordered a couple to because they were so cheap. You are the first person I have heard give bad reviews. Can you tell us about your experiences with the Mcenroe in a little more detail?

tonysk83
01-01-2006, 11:39 AM
How about all the flexpoints since they were basically just dressed up liquidmetals.

The Pusher Terminator
01-01-2006, 11:56 AM
Ncode90 when compared to the tour90


Is there a tour 90? I did not see it on TW.

Swan Song
01-01-2006, 01:36 PM
Is there a tour 90? I did not see it on TW.
ssjkyle31 was referring to the Pro Staff Tour 90 that came out in the middle of 2003.
In regarding this topic, did I find any disappointing racquets in 2005? Pretty much none since I have not demoed hit with most of them yet except the O3 Red, which I thought was good.

NoBadMojo
01-01-2006, 02:53 PM
I think the Volkl 9 VE was a bow wow.

rfprse
01-01-2006, 05:14 PM
flexpoint radical tour & o3 tour.
Maybe my expectation was too high.

WhatBackhand?
01-02-2006, 07:35 AM
How about all the flexpoints since they were basically just dressed up liquidmetals.

I don't agree at all. Adding the flexpoint finally makes the liquidmetal technology worthwile - adding more control and touch (and making it easier to keep difficult defensive shots in bounds) while not sacrificing power. Playing with the FlexPoint 4 has improved my game considerably to the shock of my steady partners that now expect to lose as much as they used to expect to win. (This after owning the racquet just for a matter of months). :cool:

jonolau
01-02-2006, 07:41 AM
That's what happened with my Volkl C10 ProTour. I didn't like it. It felt too head-light. The volleys were okay but it didn't have the punch that I was used to having. My serves were very weak. But, after I put lead tape on the racquet it feels terrific, except for the serve, which I'm still working on by putting more lead tape on the racquet. :-)
Rather than experimenting with weights on my C10 Pro and affecting stability at the net, I opted for a different string (Gamma ZO Sweet 17) and that changed things quite dramatically on my serve.

jaykay
01-02-2006, 12:46 PM
I don't agree at all. Adding the flexpoint finally makes the liquidmetal technology worthwile - adding more control and touch (and making it easier to keep difficult defensive shots in bounds) while not sacrificing power. Playing with the FlexPoint 4 has improved my game considerably to the shock of my steady partners that now expect to lose as much as they used to expect to win. (This after owning the racquet just for a matter of months). :cool:

Totally agree with 'WhatBackhand?'. Whilst I agree there is huge marketing hype around racquet technologies (flexpoint, nanocode, piezoelectric fibers, triple threat braids and whatnot), the flexpoint thing really worked; atleast for me. I demo-ed a bunch of racquets and found the FlexPoint 4 giving me awesome accuracy/precision, power, control as well as maneuverability at the net... much to the consternation of my opponents.

I just bought the Head FP4 with the Head FiberGel 16g strung at 59lbs (which took a healthy-sized bite out of my wallet). Defly don't think that the Head FP4 in particular or Flexpoint technology in general, qualify for the most 'disappointing racquets for 2005'.

kaztennis
08-07-2006, 01:08 PM
Most disappointed is O3 tour, even I didn't have any expectation after POG.
Flexpoint Radical Tour is by far the best. Best for old-school players who can generate enough power.


Totally agree! I'm an old school player and my main racquet it Flexpoint Radical Tour. I demoed the 03 tour and it was a big disappointement as I didn't like the feel/feedback.

fastdunn
08-07-2006, 01:36 PM
I've read some people have problem with FXP.
I've head FXP prestige for 2 weeks and no problems what so ever.

mark rodgers
08-07-2006, 01:40 PM
The Dunlop Maxply is one of the better racquets that came out in 2005!

josef
08-07-2006, 01:41 PM
Aeropro Control. I thought the Aeropro Drive was a respectable racquet so I expected good things from the Control. It just felt like a club.

yeah.. my vote goes to Aeropro Control. I couldn't buy a good shot. it just felt bad to me... ah well.

prorain
08-07-2006, 02:17 PM
Head flexpoint prestige. didnt like it at all. gave me arm problems.

badmice1
08-07-2006, 02:18 PM
Mfil 200, O3 tour, and in some ways the nCode Tour 90 because it was marketed as a player's racquet that nobody can play with.

Kevin T
08-07-2006, 02:44 PM
Rabbit,

All you need to do is change the grip out for leather and put a little lead at 10 and 2...perfection!!

skraggle
08-07-2006, 03:02 PM
All these people badmouthing (and badmicing) my beloved M-Fil 200s is making me angry, and when I get angry I just go BERSERK! (Tom Laughlin, Billy Jack, 1971)

SFrazeur
08-07-2006, 03:02 PM
The N6.1 90 is not a disappointment of 2005 that no one can play with.

It came out in 2004. :cool:

cghipp
08-07-2006, 04:40 PM
Head Flexpoint Prestige. The only Prestige I've ever disliked. Both my shots and my wrist suffered with it.

Court_Jester
08-07-2006, 04:44 PM
Good to know that I'm not alone in my opinion about the O3 Tour. I had very high hopes about this racquet when I demoed it but I absolutely hated its feel. What a disappointment!

Duzza
08-08-2006, 03:13 AM
Yeah Flexpoint.