View Full Version : Info on Wilson Pro Staff 7.5.

01-06-2006, 08:29 AM
Hi everybody,

does anybody have any info (tecnical details too) on Wilson Pro Staff 7.5 racquet and the type of player and the type of game it fits better? I think it's a frame of 1980's.



01-06-2006, 08:34 AM
white or blue? soft frame, good control.

01-06-2006, 08:57 AM
Is it very different than wilson pro staff 6.0 (Sampras model) or 6.1 classic (Edberg model)? Obvously i'm talking about commercial racquets, not the customized racquets for pros ...


louis netman
01-06-2006, 09:41 AM
Do a search, I had an inquiry about it (the Steffi stick) awhile back. Flex about 54RDC, 12oz, 95".....

01-06-2006, 11:19 AM
I have been playing a Wilson Pro Staff 7.5, 110 sq in for the past 15 years or so. I have tried to replace it with a new updated racquet for the past year and have demo'd over 20 racquets, but keep coming back to mine. The following information was provided to me by Wilson concerning this racquet: 1. Very close to the Classic 6.1 concerning power. 2. 7.5 is more head-light. 3. 7.5 is a little more flexible. 4. Wt.: 12.1 Balance: 10pts head-light Strings: 18by19.

01-06-2006, 07:04 PM
Wilson PS 7.5 95 used the same mold as the PSC 6.1 95. Extremely headlight, believe 12 pts. Cured my TE. Still own the 95 and 110

01-07-2006, 06:02 AM
What kind of game/player do you think it fits better?

07-08-2014, 03:29 PM
Recently acquired one of this, tested it with old strings that came with it, felt absolutely underpowered. Must be the strings I think. Found new grommets for it, and planning to restring it with soft co-poly at mid 40's. I am attracted to the low flex size and shape of the racket, read lots of positive reviews on the whole prostaff line, so feel the need to explore it more.

Can anyone who has tested it make comparison of this racquet or comment more?


07-08-2014, 03:30 PM
Forgot to mention I am talking about 95in size.

07-08-2014, 08:11 PM
From what I remember about that racket 'underpowered' hits the nail right on the head. Too flexible and not enough weight. It felt flimsy, like a toy compared to the 6.1 and 4.2 classic which both felt just rock solid. Remember Wilson slapped the name Pro Staff on a lot of rackets back in the 90's and not all of them were good.