View Full Version : pro staff classic 6.1 vs hyper pro staff 6.1

06-08-2004, 11:37 AM
Has anyone played these racket. What's the difference??

06-08-2004, 12:12 PM
classic is heavier, feels stiffer, more solid, more powerful. More of a beast imo.

hyper is mushier, softer, more manueverable, kind of whippier, ball can fly, some say easier on the body.

lots of posts on these boards about opinions on these two. :)

06-08-2004, 12:58 PM
i much prefer the classic, the hyper just didnt feel as solid or seem to play as well......that said, both were a bit too stiff for my tastes.

06-08-2004, 02:09 PM
I liked the feel of the HPS 6.1 and it's higher flex, but the racket swung heavier than the Classic 6.1 and thus I didnt switch to it. I have high hopes for the Ncode six-one 95. Hoping that it feels similiar to the Classic and HPS, but in lighter, more manuverable package.

06-10-2004, 12:03 PM
i believe the classic was better, but now i play with the tour 90, and just recieved my Ncodes tour 90

06-10-2004, 12:27 PM
i believe the classic was better, but now i play with the tour 90, and just recieved my Ncodes tour 90

Can you please provide us with some feedback on how your new nSix-One Tours play as compared to the Tour 90?

06-10-2004, 12:43 PM
ditto the request for ncode eval.

Back to the classic: I liked it better than the hps.
I have 6 newish 4 3/8 that will go up for sale if the ncode is better

06-10-2004, 12:47 PM
where did you order your nCodes from that you already got them? I'm waiting on mine directly through Wilson and they say it's going to take another week and a half.

06-10-2004, 02:09 PM
Nice thread-jack guys. He wants to to know about the Classic 6.1 and HPS 6.1, not the Tour 90 or nCode. :roll:

06-11-2004, 02:29 PM
I got my Ncodes in advance because wilson told me that i have to play with them at the super nationals this summer, so i wanted to practice with them early. I dun know when it will be released for the public. It plays almost the same as the old tour 90, a bit more stable and more headlight, a bit more pop on the strokes as well, good racket, and pretty good improvement from the orig tour 90

06-11-2004, 10:20 PM
classic more solid than the hps imo. more pop, too bad it killed my shoulder thou. didn't have problems w/ the hps, but just couldn't get used to it.

06-12-2004, 01:13 AM
ok, how about a comparison between the psc 6.1 and the nsix-one 95? i know that min did one, but has anyone else hit with the nsix-one 95?