PDA

View Full Version : More Pop? Dunlop 200G XL or M-Fil 200 Plus?


jelichek
02-26-2006, 01:30 PM
For anyone who has hit with both. Need to get some sticks for my high school kids and these two seem like they might get job done. Espcially price wise so am wondering which one is gonna give 'em a little more juice on the ball. Thanks!

DragonFly
02-26-2006, 10:04 PM
I'd think the mfil would be more powerful, since as a pattern, the 300 mfil is more powerful than the 300g. Any of the 200 series isn't that powerful of a racquet by the way, they are more control oriented. But I think the mfil 200 would be stronger.

Bora
02-28-2006, 09:47 AM
Actually, the M-Fil 200 Plus is pretty powerful, especially for a stick with such a thin beam. Definitely much more powerful than the 200XL.

mansrow
02-28-2006, 10:20 AM
M-fil200 = heavier and have a 18x20
200g XL= lighter and longer, has a 16x18

both same headsize and same beam width but m-fil is stiffer.
m-fil look like a candy coated racquet and the 200g xl looked like a bee.

then again, its your call. i guess they need to test them for themselves to find out which is more suitable for them.

Bora
02-28-2006, 11:09 AM
M-fil200 = heavier and have a 18x20
200g XL= lighter and longer, has a 16x18

both same headsize and same beam width but m-fil is stiffer.
m-fil look like a candy coated racquet and the 200g xl looked like a bee.

then again, its your call. i guess they need to test them for themselves to find out which is more suitable for them.

We are talking about M-Fil 200 Plus not 200. 200 Plus is lighter, stiffer, 98 inch head and 27.5 inches long.

mansrow
02-28-2006, 04:17 PM
my bad, didnt concentrate when reading.

like i said, demo them.