View Full Version : Gamma Damp vs. Pete Damp
Hey guys, i recently bought a gamma warm with the special gel inside of it. I have been playing with it and I think it's great. But recently a friend gave me a pack of Pete Sampras O's. I havn't have time to test it out and I have a tournament coming up. If any of you can tell me which is the better dampener, I will be very happy. Thank you
05-10-2006, 08:56 PM
there isnt such a thing as better dampner. But if u like almost no shock go with the gamma, and if you like some shock use the pete.:mrgreen:
05-10-2006, 09:02 PM
I use the worm on my pd and it feels nice. I dont like shock that much.
05-10-2006, 09:27 PM
I will the Pete damp a try
05-11-2006, 11:06 AM
I have tried many types of dampeners -- the stock volkl (like a worm), volkl vibra stop, prince silencer, babolat custom, babolat vibration system dampener, gamma shockbuster II, gamma no shock, luxi-worm, stock Head, Wilson W, and the Wilson O (Pete Sampras). I can say, after using all of these, that I prefer the O. I like the sound it creates (or allows for) and it tends to tighten up the middle of your stringbed (not sure how to explain this) -- moreso than the Babolat custom (also an O).
vBulletin® v3.6.9, Copyright ©2000-2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.