PDA

View Full Version : Racketdesign, are u there? Or any HM200G users?


Furball
07-08-2004, 09:53 PM
Hi,

I played with the MW 200G before but I find that the swingweight is too low at 315; and the head (hoop) seems to be too "soft" especially when I miss the sweet spot.

What kind of experience should I get if it is the HM 200G? Is the hoop stiffer?

What modification should I make to the HM 200G to achieve
1. swingweight of 320 &
2. 6 pt HL

Thanks.

007
07-09-2004, 10:47 AM
lead @ 3 & 9 will boost SW and make balance less HL

007
07-09-2004, 10:50 AM
lead @ 3 & 9 will boost SW and make balance less HL

I just acquired a MW200G and does it feel great! Very solid & crisp impact feel with almost no vibration. It is very headlight and yes, the hoop does flex but it puts the 'sweet' in sweetspot.

thn7530
07-09-2004, 12:57 PM
What's MW stand for?

16
07-09-2004, 01:51 PM
muscle weave

Chanchai
07-09-2004, 07:23 PM
My experiences playing with the MW and then the HM...

-The HM felt like the swing weight was heavier for me. Significantly heavier in my mind.

-There was a "crisper" feel on solid hits. Wonderful feeling when you get that sweet spot.

-A lot less stable when missing the sweet spot--this may contradict other reports though, but I felt I was much more punished for missing the sweet spot on the HM than with the MW.

-I thought it was more solid feeling on volleys.

-I preferred serving with the Muscle Weave, but maybe it's me (or maybe I'm less accurate in serving :P)

I have thought about picking up a 200G and end up debating which one to get... I like both the MW and the HM a lot, sometimes I feel I want to go ahead and go with HM, but the MW has been the most comfortable of the two for me. Maybe also the most forgiving between the two. I haven't had the pleasures of trying out the Revelation or Max 200Gs yet.

-Chanchai