PDA

View Full Version : Federer is in the crowd watching Ancic/Wawrinka


Rhino
06-30-2006, 12:29 PM
I've never seen this b4, he's sat with Mirka.
I guess Fed can say he's watching his mate play, but also he is watching a rival....

FedererUberAlles
06-30-2006, 12:42 PM
He's watching because Wawrinka is an up and coming Swiss player, I suppose.

ACE of Hearts
06-30-2006, 12:44 PM
Ancic is playing very well.Roger is always looking for new things.

Rhino
06-30-2006, 12:45 PM
....and Tony Roche is out there too. Maybe they're taking notes.

arosen
06-30-2006, 02:24 PM
If Roche wasn't there, I would have said he is supporting a Swiss mate. But with Roche in the crowd too, this means they consider Ancic a big threat, the only one serious threat till the finals.

d_frank
06-30-2006, 07:38 PM
Maybe hes doing a little bit of both :p

LowProfile
06-30-2006, 08:54 PM
Wawrinka is a good friend of Federer's.

emcee
06-30-2006, 08:58 PM
Yeah it's probably both. How convenient for him, eh?

wyutani
07-01-2006, 12:19 AM
He's watching because Wawrinka is an up and coming Swiss player, I suppose.

yep, fed is jealous of wawrinka. lolz...lolz, wawrinka is afterall the future swiss no.1 duh!

Fumoffu
07-01-2006, 12:27 AM
yep, fed is jealous of wawrinka. lolz...lolz, wawrinka is afterall the future swiss no.1 duh!
Only because Fed will defect from Switzerland and make his own country, I think they'll call it Goatland.

Matthew
07-01-2006, 01:30 AM
Wawrinka is the excuse, Ancic is the reason.

Let me say it again - Ancic will win Wimbledon!

boughtmypoints
07-01-2006, 02:25 AM
Not so unusual for Federer. He was checking out matches by himself at Halle, the tournament before. Nobody recognised/bothered him. He's very unassuming and self effacing.

Ztalin
07-01-2006, 03:04 AM
Wawrinka is the excuse, Ancic is the reason.

Let me say it again - Ancic will win Wimbledon!

Ancic is definitely Roger's biggest threat; I've said this from the beginning. But I don't really see him taking more than a set off of Fed.

superman1
07-01-2006, 03:08 AM
Agassi or Roddick in the final would be a much tougher test for Federer. Even Nadal in the final would be a bigger test than Ancic. Hewitt in the final, on the other hand, would go something like 6-2 6-0 6-1, and would be one of the most boring finals ever, right next to the US Open 2004.

d_frank
07-01-2006, 08:25 AM
Only because Fed will defect from Switzerland and make his own country, I think they'll call it Goatland.
hahaha nice :D

LowProfile
07-01-2006, 08:29 AM
Agassi or Roddick in the final would be a much tougher test for Federer. Even Nadal in the final would be a bigger test than Ancic. Hewitt in the final, on the other hand, would go something like 6-2 6-0 6-1, and would be one of the most boring finals ever, right next to the US Open 2004.

That was not a boring final in any sense of the word. It was such an amazing display of GOATness. Hewitt, one of the top hardcourt players (perhaps the best) of that season was absolutely blown off of the court. It was an incredible display to watch.

A boring final was Hewitt def. Nalbandian at Wimbledon 2002. Now that is something not worth repeating.

HotCarl
07-01-2006, 09:08 AM
Word...........