No. He's injured. He will return in Hamburg. Read his official website.
No. He's injured. He will return in Hamburg. Read his official website.
Did he ask for one, Fee?
Not sure, haven't really been paying attention. He may not have (which would be kind of classy of him).
huh? ask for a wild card? isnt that like asking for a nomination to the supreme court--okay maybe like the court of appeals. I thought tournaments selected very highly qualified players (often local) who wouldnt otheriwise make it into the main draw. I didnt know asking ever came into it.Did he ask for one, Fee?
hopefully canas will get in the main draw, he'll prolly play safin.
if they're really mean they put Canas into Fed's eighth, so that he has to play him in his second match
I wonder if the black cloud of the doping ban is still following Canas around....perhaps tournaments (especially MS) don't want to look like they're "promoting" the advancement of a player with such a history.
And you should be forced to qualify for the brain auction they're doing around the block. It's a pity what they're doing to you!!
In my opinion, it's not fair. Everyone has the right to have a brain.
I'll join your cruzade.
quite possibly. he should play Estoril. he could even be a seed, and it's low, so they won't do tons of drug tests
Huh? Estoril will be over on Sunday, and it's an ATP tournament so they do the same amount of drug testing as any other tournament.
Canas deserves the dark cloud. He should be forced to qualify for slams even if he's top 10in ATP rankings. Doping = 1 strike and you're out!!!!!
At this point it's unfair to make Cañas qualify for any tournament. He had to qualify for the Pacific Open too, so he got to the final with 2 matches more than Djokovic. He had a lower ranking then, but now it seems like an unfair disadvantage.
i meant he should have played Estoril. Sorry!
honestly, he should be seeded! He is so good, taking out Roger two times in a row, is amazing..do they take that in considerration?
I think its stupid to look at player's ranking 6 weeks before the tournament. I mean the Canas story is such a perfect example as to why tournaments should be more mindful of the current status of a player.
At this point it's unfair to make Cañas qualify for any tournament. He had to qualify for the Pacific Open too, so he got to the final with 2 matches more than Djokovic. He had a lower ranking then, but now it seems like an unfair disadvantage.
i agree fully! by the time he gets to the finals, he's not able to play his best because he's prone to cramping due to all the miles he's put on his wheels in qualifying and the main draw!
I see. I think he intentionally took this week off to rest up a strained muscle and prepare for the Rome qualies.
I think he's already qualified at least as a lucky loser. He's seeded 1º for the qualy rounds. In that case, struggling against Serra is just a waste of time. Reminds me of that strange round robin experiment...
So players shouldn't have to enter a tournament 6 weeks in advance? When would you have them enter, and how would you get the tournament directors to go along with your proposal?
But as I understand it, if Canas loses to Serra, he has to have the luck that one of the seven qualifiers withdraws to get in as a lucky loser. But that is not very likely to happen...
yes, that is another possiblity, which however is unlikely also.I'm not sure how it works, but i think that if any player from the main draw quits (like Nalbandian did) another qualifier is needed to replace him.
He didn't take the week off. He played Munich instead of Estoril. He lost to Devilder 4-6 2-1 ret.
But as I understand it, if Canas loses to Serra, he has to have the luck that one of the seven qualifiers withdraws to get in as a lucky loser. But that is not very likely to happen...
I’m not arguing against when a player should enter/commit to playing a tournament (six weeks is fine) –I’m arguing against when the tournament decides to look at a player’s ranking to place them in either the qualifying or main draw. Six weeks is way too early. I really don’t think it should be this far in advance… maybe more like three weeks to make the decision?
I’m not arguing against when a player should enter/commit to playing a tournament (six weeks is fine) –I’m arguing against when the tournament decides to look at a player’s ranking to place them in either the qualifying or main draw. Six weeks is way too early. I really don’t think it should be this far in advance… maybe more like three weeks to make the decision?
good point - six weeks seems too far in advance!
What about the players who need to plan their schedules and make flight arrangements? The 6 week entry system has been beneficial to them as well. It's also beneficial to guys on the alternate list. It gives them 3 weeks to decide whether to take their chances with ATP qualies, or perhaps enter a Challenger that week instead if they will get directly in (since Challenger entries are due 3 weeks in advance).
There is a proposal to change the entry system to 4 weeks next season, but I do not see how anything shorter than that will benefit anyone, even the players. Again, you are looking at the instance of one player who played well over a two week span to make a huge jump in the rankings. Movement like that doesn't often happen. Canas had to qualify for one Masters event like everyone else who did not get one of the direct entry spots. He is not suffering, and he is set for the rest of the year.
But since you are a die hard tennis fan who pays attention to every little detail, what do you propose for an entry system that is fair to all of the players? Do you really think that you can require players to enter a tournament 4 weeks in advance, then on the Friday the tournament begins say 'yes, I know you were ranked 62 when the entries were due and that put you in the main draw, but now you are ranked 87 and you have to play qualies. This other guy has moved up and taken your spot. Yeah, make sure you spend another $500 to change that flight at the last minute so you can get here by sign in!'