2018 was decent on the dirt...SF at Madrid and R16 at Rome before losing early at RG. Last year was crapola.I was worried he'd go out early like FAA, but he looked like he could have a run on clay!
Lots of points available to gain then2018 was decent on the dirt...SF at Madrid and R16 at Rome before losing early at RG. Last year was crapola.
Live-tennis is listing Rome, Hamburg and RG on his schedule so he is committed to improvement on his weakest surface. However, I wouldn’t be surprised If Hamburg goes away with a win vs Martinez. Should he win later today he has either Humbert (Shapo Lite) or floundering Fognini before an encounter with a non-repentant SinnerWow, a convincing win:
I'm glad he's starting to win these tricky matches not only more consistently, but convincingly as well. No matter who he plays, I'm always wondering if good-Denis or bad-Denis is going to show up (a Wimby 2001 reference there). He was 2-6 on clay last year, but some bad luck of the draw was involved.
- on clay
- against a clay veteran
- on his first match on the surface this year
Shapo has very good reach. His arm span is like 7'.I just watched the highlights against Pella, and doubles seems to have really helped with his net positioning. He managed to get a lot of shots that I expected to pass him (and most players these days) by.
His arms are attached to his body by elastic.Shapo has very good reach. His arm span is like 7'.
Tidy, but messy.Very tidy win in 1:40 for Shapo, 4&4, despite some service woes (broken twice, under 50%, DFs (2), aces (3). He managed to attack Martinez’s serve to get four breaks of his own and won 45% of the return points.
The Fognini/Humbert winner is next in the R16.
Martinez was outclassed before the match started, but Shapo managed to make a match out of it.Very tidy win in 1:40 for Shapo, 4&4, despite some service woes (broken twice, under 50%, DFs (2), aces (3). He managed to attack Martinez’s serve to get four breaks of his own and won 45% of the return points.
The Fognini/Humbert winner is next in the R16.
You got your wishWould prefer humbert. Fognini is very tough on clay. He's even beaten Rafa once.
Humbert it is. Fognini is quite off; maybe the recovery from the ankle surgery is still a factor. He’s now 4-8 in 2020 and two of those wins were in 5th set TBs at AO.Martinez was outclassed before the match started, but Shapo managed to make a match out of it.
Shapo almost pulling a Stan here, spraying errors left and right and missing just about every first serve he could. Managed to grab that first set fairly convincingly anyway, but in the second Pedro Martinez turned into Pedro Gruntinez, and his level improved. Thankfully Shaps managed to up his game as well after being down a break, and both guys seemed to start a noise competition. The grunting and "come on"s and "bamos"es were pretty overt, and the atmosphere between the two guys was pretty tense. Denis played a couple solid points to break and serve for the match, avoiding a potentially grindy and exhausting third set. Not a match to remember, but a well fought grindy win nonetheless.
3rd round against Humble Humbert or Fabious Fog. Hard to predict who's going through given the Frenchman's inconsistency and the Italian's, er, mercuriality, and harder to predict how the winner is going to perform tomorrow, combined with Shapo's own, er, ups-and-downs... we all see where I'm going here. I'm hoping for an entertaining match, but I'm not discounting a total sheetshow.
I saw the results, but it didn't register that Shapo had taken Pella twice in two days.....thanks for pointing that out!A nice tidy 6-4, 6-4 win at doubles, poor Pella must be pissed losing to Denis two times in two days.
I'm not sure that's a fair analysis. The guy just won 2 tough three setters in a row, and lost in a third set tiebreak to a clay specialist who just beat Nadal on clay. On a surface that doesn't play to his strengths.I swear Shap is a glutton for punishment losing marathon matches. It doesn't help he absolutely should be winning these too. I guess when he crosses over eventually it will be glorious.
He will be soon enough. Fed didn't win his first slam until he was almost 22, so Denis has time. His net play and BH have improved dramatically since last year. His match against Diego today was the match of the year, very exciting stuff, even in defeat.But, he's not ready to be a champ yet...
Rank | Player |
9 | Gael Monfils Lone appearance came in 2016 |
10 | Denis Shapovalov Seeks to qualify for 1st time |
11 | Roberto Bautista Agut Seeks to qualify for 1st time |
12 | David Goffin Reached final in last appearance in 2017 |
13 | Diego Schwartzman Seeks to qualify for 1st time |
14 | Andrey Rublev Seeks to qualify for 1st time |
15 | Fabio Fognini Seeks to qualify for 1st time |
16 | Karen Khachanov Seeks to qualify for 1st time |
At RG, he has to beat Tsitsipas and Medvedev in that quarter - no necessarily easy.
Rublev is the biggest hurdle.At RG, he has to beat Tsitsipas and Medvedev in that quarter - not necessarily easy.
I agree, I think he will win this quarter, Rublev will be tired .Rublev is the biggest hurdle.
Medvedev is out.At RG, he has to beat Tsitsipas and Medvedev in that quarter - not necessarily easy.
I always enjoy your take.A four-set win for Shapo against Gilles Simon in first-round singles action on Tuesday evening in Paris. The final score was 6-2, 7-5, 5-7, 6-3, and of those 41 games neatly half were won on breaks on serve. That's why, although it might not look like the closest of matches from the score alone, its outcome was uncertain until the very last point had been played.
The whole match might have pivoted on the ninth of the second set in which Simon, ahead 5-3, was serving and led 40-0 before Shapo fought back and took the game after saving another two set points. On one of them the Frenchman thought he had hit a winning serve, and the linesman agreed with him. But the umpire overruled the linesman and Simon lost the point, the game and, eventually, the set.
Shapo could have and probably should have won the match in three sets, but after leading 3-2 in the third set with his serve to follow, he was broken. This was the most worrying feature of the match from his point of view: his inability to hold serve at some of the crucial stages. A better player than Gilles Simon would have exploited this weakness to the full and might even have won the match.