Tennis deserves to die based on how ATP promoted the big 3 in the last 5-6 years, they should have done enough to stop Nadal from winning more french opens, they should have presented greater challenge to novak. Roger would have adapted to all this because he anyway isn't the guy winning slams, if someone can beat Djokodal then certainly Federer would also be beaten.
ATP should have introduced new rules, changed courts, equipments and stuffs to suit younger players so that the game became more interesting. This time the Aus open was quite fast, a good change, this should have started at least 4-5 years ago at all 4 slams, youngsters should have been promoted to improve their grass game by giving them incentives to do..... Clay should have been sped up or some new variation of clay should have been introduced to it..... A 9 or 10 time champion like Rafa will adapt to it, if he cannot then he deserves to lose, if he wants to boycott the open then so be it, that would be his choice, either ways Tennis would have benefitted.... What is the use of having a 13 time french open champion who will aim for 15-16 when he is done??? What impact will that have on future generations of clay courters ?
Now the big 3 have become so big that when they fall the game will be finished.... nobody to take the game forward for at least 5-7 years after that, you will see 1-2 generation of 3-5 time champions after that, nobody will win 14-15 slams for at least the next 10 years, in that period Tennis would have gone down.
