Wrong, and you know it.
for one thing, Nalbandian's 2 TMS+TMC trumps Djokovic's 3 TMS.
Secondly, Nalbandian can account for the majority of his success to his backhand. Djokovic on the other hand, can fall back on a number of things even when his backhand is misfiring.
What a ridiculous post. You're implying that I don't believe in my own selection?
First of all, the topic is who
currently has the best two hander. Nalbandian doesn't have any significant titles under his belt this year. Secondly, why are you simply comparing only Masters titles, and why not mention that Nalbandian's Masters Cup title came two seasons ago? We're talking
current. You also seem to glaze over Djokovic's slam title. How far did Nalbandian do at the Australian? He lost in straights in the 3rd round.
You're also implying that because Djokovic has a better all around game that he should be penalized for it, and that Nalbandian, since people really only talk about his backhand, should be glorified for it.
Saying that Djokovic's backhand is the best shot because he has "the bigger titles" is like saying that Roddick has great volleys because he's won a grand slam.
Roddick didn't win his slam by volleying did he? If I were to pick the best serve and forehand of 2003, Roddick would be at the top of my list for both.
Djokovic routinely dominated play with his backhand en route to his Aussie title. His ground game is what won him his titles this year.
So no, you're analogy is stupid. Next.