Is Dimitrov destined for greatness?

pound cat

G.O.A.T.
Nadal wasn't even trying, that's why fed got to win four games in that match. Any solid player would beat down fed on clay, even some of the better D2 players. And the fact that you need to resort to violent threats is not a good indicator of character, since it shows lack of capability within the scope of an intellectual discussion. I wish Grigor all the best.


Now, now, never would Nadal not "even be trying? "

and why has this thread gone back to Federer/Nadal????

There is life beyond these 2. Really there is.
 

SoBad

G.O.A.T.
Now, now, never would Nadal not "even be trying? "

and why has this thread gone back to Federer/Nadal????

There is life beyond these 2. Really there is.

You know, figuratively speaking he wasn't trying. I am all against this thread or any thread being about Nadal/fed, that's how it turned out because of the everpresent *******s. Out of respect, I had to inform them of the truth. My thread was all about Dimitrov/Sofia/Varna and how everybody is going to break through this year.
 

DarthFed

Hall of Fame
Now, now, never would Nadal not "even be trying? "

and why has this thread gone back to Federer/Nadal????

There is life beyond these 2. Really there is.

That point will never get across

any solid player would beat down fed on clay, even some of the better D2 players.

:-|:???::):twisted: wow i think you shaved a few years off my life
 

SoBad

G.O.A.T.
The talk of the board last month was "is Gulbis destined for greatness?"

Only long term results count. No use getting excited about someone who may be a on tournament wonder. Or, a popular myth was that safin was destined for greatness. He got to be as great as he wanted to be, but never as great as people wanted him to be. But he played tennis on his own terms, and that was never factored into the equation.

You will have a better idea of Dimitrov in a few months. Be patient.

That wasn't a myth though about Safin was it? So...
 

pound cat

G.O.A.T.
That wasn't a myth though about Safin was it? So...


Maybe less a myth than an expectation not taking into account the person involved. It was more "given what we've seen it 2000, logically is should...."

But Safin never lent himself to logical thinking., and that's why he had so many fans and so much press over the years. He managed to keep the tennis world ever hopeful that they wouold be right by throwing in amazing tennis from time to time...his own time. Quite the career. One of a kind.

PS and we haven't quite given up yet.
 

RoddickAce

Hall of Fame
The logical response would be "it's too early to tell..." but that takes the point and fun out of it. If we all waited till he's ranked #1 or dropped out of the tour, who needs anyone to tell us whether he's destined for greatness? That said, I still say it's too early to tell :D
 

Nadal_Freak

Banned
Yes, and there have been many discussions and studies on that, if you do a search. But basically the conclusion was that he does not look like a tennis player and is not good for tennis because of his image, cosmetics, purse, gamesmanship, etc. And also there were broader studies, and many tables illustrating, and actually this is one from that link I quoted earlier (which is why I am not sure how many slams):

table1.jpg
Lmao. Nice find but Nadal should be top of it.
 

ruerooo

Legend
Maybe less a myth than an expectation not taking into account the person involved. It was more "given what we've seen it 2000, logically is should...."

But Safin never lent himself to logical thinking., and that's why he had so many fans and so much press over the years. He managed to keep the tennis world ever hopeful that they wouold be right by throwing in amazing tennis from time to time...his own time. Quite the career. One of a kind.

PS and we haven't quite given up yet.

Hahaha. I thought I was the only one, so I was keeping it to myself. :D
 
Yeah I can already tell you that Dimitrov is better than fed was at his age, and in fact is already better than fed ever was at any age.:-o

wth

...If he was better than Fed was at ANY age, then why doesn't he have a single men's GS. If he is better than Federer is/ever was, why isn't he in the top 5 on the ATP tour???
 

jamauss

Hall of Fame
Yes, and there have been many discussions and studies on that, if you do a search. But basically the conclusion was that he does not look like a tennis player and is not good for tennis because of his image, cosmetics, purse, gamesmanship, etc. And also there were broader studies, and many tables illustrating, and actually this is one from that link I quoted earlier (which is why I am not sure how many slams):

table1.jpg
I think quite possibly the most stunning stat displayed here is Agassi getting a "1" for personality. :shock:
 

seffina

G.O.A.T.
wth

...If he was better than Fed was at ANY age, then why doesn't he have a single men's GS. If he is better than Federer is/ever was, why isn't he in the top 5 on the ATP tour???
He meant he's a better speaker of Bulgarian than Federer and always has been. He also has an edge in rhythmic gymnastics.
 
Last edited:

oranges

Hall of Fame
No..

I find it even more shoking that Pat Rafter got 2 in look while Guga got 4 and Hewitt got 3. You should leave it to women to judge the men 'look'...:shock:

Well, at least none of them officially has the best-looker title. They named the fair play award after a guy who got barely a passing mark for sportsmanship, LOL.
 

Pwned

Hall of Fame
I think you are taking words out of context without having read the entire discussion. And before you insult the intelligence of long-time posters, you may wish to consider their expertise and the fact that they have educated and coached many to greatness on the forum. It's all relative, you see - accomplishments need to be considered within context of others' accomplishments, so just because someone managed to achieve something (which may not be that much) does not mean that they are not overhyped (which they are, in this instance).

No one is going to take you seriously when you post like a mentally challenged 8 year old.
 

Ludas

New User
In the article posted as the first reply on page 1 it says Peter Lundgren is a "swiss". Why the hell is it so hard to see the difference between Sweden (swedish) and Switzerland (swiss)? Peter Lundgren is swedish.

It reminds me of a funny story when me and some friends were travelling in the U.S. and wanted to exchange swedish money to american $ and the idiot in the bank thought it was swiss money and gave us 6 times as much $ back as we should have gotten. Haha that's what you get when you're ignorant :)
 

alonsin

Rookie
I really don't know why people feel like if they were attacked personally when somebody says something bad about a player

Anyway, SoBad I really like your posts, this boards really need humor and different approaches.

I've heard Dimitrov is very talented, but I haven't seen him play so I cannot comment. But I don't think his coach saying that he's more talented than Federer helps keeping him grounded.
 
It reminds me of a funny story when me and some friends were travelling in the U.S. and wanted to exchange swedish money to american $ and the idiot in the bank thought it was swiss money and gave us 6 times as much $ back as we should have gotten. Haha that's what you get when you're ignorant :)
Americans receive their secondary education in American schools which teach nothing about the affairs of the rest of the world. I know; I'm an American.
 

Ludas

New User
Americans receive their secondary education in American schools which teach nothing about the affairs of the rest of the world. I know; I'm an American.

Yea I realized this when a guy asked me if I'm going back to Sweden by plane or bus... true story!
Also a cop asked my friend if he was from western or eastern Germany. This was 2001.
Gave us a good laugh tho ;)
 

pound cat

G.O.A.T.
In the article posted as the first reply on page 1 it says Peter Lundgren is a "swiss". Why the hell is it so hard to see the difference between Sweden (swedish) and Switzerland (swiss)? Peter Lundgren is swedish.

It reminds me of a funny story when me and some friends were travelling in the U.S. and wanted to exchange swedish money to american $ and the idiot in the bank thought it was swiss money and gave us 6 times as much $ back as we should have gotten. Haha that's what you get when you're ignorant :)


Good one.
 

dParis

Hall of Fame
Yes, and there have been many discussions and studies on that, if you do a search. But basically the conclusion was that he does not look like a tennis player and is not good for tennis because of his image, cosmetics, purse, gamesmanship, etc. And also there were broader studies, and many tables illustrating, and actually this is one from that link I quoted earlier (which is why I am not sure how many slams):

table1.jpg

What in the world is that table? Don't you understand that when people discuss the GOAT they are talking about playing ability and professional success? Most of the criteria on the table you present is highly subjective. I'm not saying that it's not important or should be ignored. It's just that it doesn't relate to the discussion regarding the GOAT in its common context.
 

illkhiboy

Hall of Fame
I don’t know, I just pasted the picture from the articles in your link. I bet its W though because of the whole aura of history and phoniness in the background.

Regards Sampras, he is not a bad player, considering the No. 3 spot in the greatest of all. He may have fallen just short of Safin and Kafelnikov, but comfortably in the lead against others (like 10 spots ahead of fed for instance).

I disagree with you. I think Sampras is a better looking guy than Kafelnikov.
 

SoBad

G.O.A.T.
What in the world is that table? Don't you understand that when people discuss the GOAT they are talking about playing ability and professional success? Most of the criteria on the table you present is highly subjective. I'm not saying that it's not important or should be ignored. It's just that it doesn't relate to the discussion regarding the GOAT in its common context.

Well you rightly point out that all those factors are important and cannot be ignored, which is precisely the reason why those factors are included in the table. It is a little bit more intellectually challenging than adding up slams, but it is a challenge each of us needs to be willing to overcome if we are to consider ourselves great tennis analysts. Because it is also about keeping an open mind and thinking out of the box.
 

SoBad

G.O.A.T.
Yea I realized this when a guy asked me if I'm going back to Sweden by plane or bus... true story!
Also a cop asked my friend if he was from western or eastern Germany. This was 2001.
Gave us a good laugh tho ;)

Yeah traveling to Sweden by bus from the US does not sound right. But I don't really see anything wrong with the Germany question. I mean, even though they have been united for a while, those are still two distinct parts of the country. From what I understand from history and economics, the post WWII borders weren't arbitrary, but rather followed a natural division between the part of the country more favourable in terms of geography and climate and therefore more prosperous, and the more challenging area in the East. Therefore, I don't think it was a ridiculous question necessarily.
 

SoBad

G.O.A.T.
I really don't know why people feel like if they were attacked personally when somebody says something bad about a player

Anyway, SoBad I really like your posts, this boards really need humor and different approaches.

I've heard Dimitrov is very talented, but I haven't seen him play so I cannot comment. But I don't think his coach saying that he's more talented than Federer helps keeping him grounded.

Hey thanks for your nice comments. The thing about these forums is that they are full of loonies indoctrinated by the establishment funded with shady money from wilson nike and feds. That’s why they get out of wack when people call things their proper names.

I don’t think there is a problem with Lundgren telling Grisha the truth about his talent. I mean, it should not be up to the player’s coach to keep him grounded, but up to the opponents, if they can. I would like to see some slams from him starting this year!
 

SoBad

G.O.A.T.
Hahaha. I thought I was the only one, so I was keeping it to myself. :D

There are actually millions of us ....LOL

Yes, very true. I know he said he is bored with the tour so he might retire from next year, I think there are some big IF's in the picture still. I feel like if he picks up a couple of slams mid-year, he could carry that momentum forward to defend the USopen, and then OZ should be a no-brainer, and I don't see him retiring after picking up a grand slam. Only time will tell, of course.
 

SoBad

G.O.A.T.
By the way, the $18,800 prize he got for this match is more than what he made all of last year, which was $15,369.

Would be great if he got a WC for IW, even though he is not an American. Can't imagine that anyone would look forward to playing him, not even Nadal.

Yeah, but most of the 18K probably goes back to Lundgren for bribing tournament director for the WC...
 

dtrain

Rookie
This kid looks like he has some weapons, only the future will tell how far he can go. Right now let's enjoy great tennis produced from Nadal and Federer (Federer not so much in the AO final).
 
This kid looks like he has some weapons, only the future will tell how far he can go. Right now let's enjoy great tennis produced from Nadal and Federer (Federer not so much in the AO final).

Bleh, all he needed was his serve. Just didn't show up enough to get it done.
 

SoBad

G.O.A.T.
Bleh, all he needed was his serve. Just didn't show up enough to get it done.

Come on, he pushed the No. 1 player in the world all the way, what more can you ask at this stage. If he could just push over the edge and beat Nadal, he might as well take the calendar slam.
 

Mike Bulgakov

G.O.A.T.
In the article posted as the first reply on page 1 it says Peter Lundgren is a "swiss". Why the hell is it so hard to see the difference between Sweden (swedish) and Switzerland (swiss)? Peter Lundgren is swedish.

It reminds me of a funny story when me and some friends were travelling in the U.S. and wanted to exchange swedish money to american $ and the idiot in the bank thought it was swiss money and gave us 6 times as much $ back as we should have gotten. Haha that's what you get when you're ignorant :)

I met an Australian guy in Copenhagen who thought he was in the Netherlands. He had taken an overnight train from Amsterdam and kept talking about all the hot "Dutch girls" walking by on Strøget. I had to explain to him that he was now in an entirely different country, and the women walking by are Danish, not Dutch. His response was, "Isn't Denmark a part of Holland, though?"
 

Ludas

New User
Yeah traveling to Sweden by bus from the US does not sound right. But I don't really see anything wrong with the Germany question. I mean, even though they have been united for a while, those are still two distinct parts of the country. From what I understand from history and economics, the post WWII borders weren't arbitrary, but rather followed a natural division between the part of the country more favourable in terms of geography and climate and therefore more prosperous, and the more challenging area in the East. Therefore, I don't think it was a ridiculous question necessarily.

Ok let me explain this. I have lived in Germany for 10 years so I see how you could think what you are saying makes sense but it doesn't for germans. Germany nowadays is divided into 16 "Bundesländer" of whom 5 used to belong to eastern germany, sort of like states in the U.S. but not quite as sovereign. The parts that used to belong to eastern Germany are non more different from the western parts nowadays and there is definitely no noticable difference in climate. To say that former eastern and western Germany still are two distinct parts of Germany is not true, there are is a much bigger difference between the state Bayern and the rest of Germany for example. German people are very offended by that kind of ignorance about their country because the reunification is the single most important event in german history since the WWII and is a symbol for peace not only in Germany but also Europe and the world.
That the western part was more prosperous is rather because the eastern part ended up belonging to the communists after WWII when germany was divided and not because of already existing economic or geographic differences.
 

julianoz

Semi-Pro
You guys realize this troll you are feeding is russian or lives in russia, thus the bias. He is on the same intellectual level as our friend nadal_freak
 

Underhand

Legend
From what I understand from history and economics, the post WWII borders weren't arbitrary, but rather followed a natural division between the part of the country more favourable in terms of geography and climate and therefore more prosperous, and the more challenging area in the East.

LOL you didn't understand anything from history. East Germany's borders followed the areas occupied by the Red Army.
 

SoBad

G.O.A.T.
Ok let me explain this. I have lived in Germany for 10 years so I see how you could think what you are saying makes sense but it doesn't for germans. Germany nowadays is divided into 16 "Bundesländer" of whom 5 used to belong to eastern germany, sort of like states in the U.S. but not quite as sovereign. The parts that used to belong to eastern Germany are non more different from the western parts nowadays and there is definitely no noticable difference in climate. To say that former eastern and western Germany still are two distinct parts of Germany is not true, there are is a much bigger difference between the state Bayern and the rest of Germany for example. German people are very offended by that kind of ignorance about their country because the reunification is the single most important event in german history since the WWII and is a symbol for peace not only in Germany but also Europe and the world.
That the western part was more prosperous is rather because the eastern part ended up belonging to the communists after WWII when germany was divided and not because of already existing economic or geographic differences.

OK thanks for your comment. I don’t have as much German experience as you do obviously, and it certainly was not my intention to offend German people in any way.

I am surprised that you say there is hadly any differences in terms of economy and standard of living between what used to be East and West, because there are numerous publications stating the contrary. I am familiar obviously with the popular theory that the reason why the Eastern part remains at a disadvantage because of its history under socialist rule, but there are scholars suggesting that there are indeed objective climatic and geological differences between the regions that account for the differential regardless of the political history. Without going into the detail of those arguments, would you agree that France is has an advantage over Poland in that regard? It may seem less obvious, but in fact the two (former) parts of Germany neighbouring those two countries are in the same respective positions relative to each other.
 

SoBad

G.O.A.T.
Dimitrov in Marseille!

This just in from our crew in Ometepe, Queyras and the islands. Dimitrov has agreed to play in Marseille next week and will be facing a local favourite Gilles Simon who is top 10 and owns fed. This should be huge after pushing Nadal all the way in Holland. We are all very excited.
 

Ludas

New User
OK thanks for your comment. I don’t have as much German experience as you do obviously, and it certainly was not my intention to offend German people in any way.

I am surprised that you say there is hadly any differences in terms of economy and standard of living between what used to be East and West, because there are numerous publications stating the contrary. I am familiar obviously with the popular theory that the reason why the Eastern part remains at a disadvantage because of its history under socialist rule, but there are scholars suggesting that there are indeed objective climatic and geological differences between the regions that account for the differential regardless of the political history. Without going into the detail of those arguments, would you agree that France is has an advantage over Poland in that regard? It may seem less obvious, but in fact the two (former) parts of Germany neighbouring those two countries are in the same respective positions relative to each other.


Since the reunification Germany alone(!) was burdened with the job of rebuilding the former eastern german parts since these were in a much worse condition than the rest of Germany thanks to the communists. Many ppl think it was unfair that Germany didn't get any financial support from cold-war allies in managing this task since it's not their fault that the eastern part of Germany was so far behind in basically every aspect (except maybe sports). It took a long time and a lot of money to equal the differences which is by many seen as one of the main reasons for Germany's financial crisis about 10 years ago. However today in terms of education, former eastern Germany has actually caught up and even passed the more conservative western german states. In terms of standard of living I can't say anything from my own experience since I've only been to Berlin once or twice the last 10 years and can't speak for the rest of the eastern states but from what I've heard there have been remarkable improvements there aswell.
About the climatic and geological differences there really aren't any worth speaking of, north and south differ a lot more than east and west in Germany, and tbh it's not that big of a country.
Also I don't really believe the climate or geology has a lot to do with the financial differences of Poland and France, personally I believe it's more because of historic events. However that doesn't mean I don't think France is a much more beautiful country than Poland, sry polish ppl but it really is ;)
 

SoBad

G.O.A.T.
Thanks, Ludas. I know a little bit about Germany and even lived there for a while as a child. Your comments are right on.

Ludas obviously knows what he is talking about, but I am not sure he is being completely objective. I am not replying to his latest post immediately, because I need to give it some thought (or find where I read what I read). But the thing is, he admits that he prefers France over Poland, but would not admit that objective geoclimatic factors play a determining role.
 
Top