Rank Nadal level of play in Roland Garros for each year

Heracles

Banned
How would you rank Nadal level of play he displayed when he won RG following the years?

Mine:

1) RG2008: His absolute best, winning the tournament without losing a set and crushing players like Verdasco, Almagro and even Federer in the final. He also easily beat Djokovic in straight set. He was on fire during this tournament.

2) RG2007: Another display of amazing tennis by Nadal. He only lost a set in the final to Federer when both were at their best. He also easily defeated Djokovic in the SF. He also crushed Moya in QF and easily beat Del Potro in the 1R and beat Hewitt in straight set.

3) RG2005: His first GS victory and first RG. At age 19 (at the end of the tournament), Nadal played an amazing tournament. Losing 3 sets and beating the like of Grosjean, Federer, Gasquet and Ferrer. and finally Puerta playing the tournament of his life like if he was possessed by Muster.

4)RG2006: He won the tournament and lost 3 sets too but overall he was not as good as in 2005. PHM and Hewitt gave him tough matchs and he defeated a Federer who was bleeding errors from his backhand 7-6 in the fourth.

5) RG 2010: Nadal did not lost a set during this tournament but he had an easy draw and played very average until the final where he raised his game and easily defeated Soderling for vengeance. But overall his level of play was not good eventhough it has to be noted that he never needed to raise his game.

6) RG2011: His worst level at RG (except 2009 of course) so far for me. The start was just a disaster. Losing two sets to an all serve Isner on clay. PLaying very badly against Andujar and putting an horrible display against Ljubicic, one of his worst match of his career at this tournament. For the last 3 matchs he raised his level and found back his tennis.
Against Soderling, Murray and Federer he put great performance that equal his level of 2005 and 2006 but who are still inferior to his 2008 and 2007 level.


His last two RG are the two last of my list. I hope he will turn that in 2012.
 
Last edited:

Heracles

Banned
uh. isner played lights out tennis. not much nadal could do but hope to survive.

Isner did not play anything special. Nadal put an horrible performance like he did against Lorenzi in Roma. Nadal should have crushed Isner if he played just at a little of his best level.
 
D

Deleted member 3771

Guest
I think what matters most is the level in the latter stages when he plays the better players. As Freddy said after the FO final "He plays better against the better ones, and that's what he showed today"

Nadal turnd it on in 2011 from the 1/4 finals match onwards.
 

Mustard

Bionic Poster
Best to worst:

1. 2008 French Open
2. 2007 French Open
3. 2005 French Open
4. 2010 French Open
5. 2006 French Open
6. 2011 French Open
7. 2009 French Open
 

kishnabe

Talk Tennis Guru
Best to worst:

1. 2008 French Open
2. 2007 French Open
3. 2006 French Open
4. 2005 French Open
5. 2009 French Open
6. 2010 French Open
7. 2011 French Open


Federer in his prime would have lavished to play the Nadal that appeared in 2011 RG!
 

MichaelNadal

Bionic Poster
Best to worst:

1. 2008 French Open
2. 2007 French Open
3. 2006 French Open
4. 2005 French Open
5. 2009 French Open
6. 2010 French Open
7. 2011 French Open


Federer in his prime would have lavished to play the Nadal that appeared in 2011 RG!

2009 above 2010 (and 11)?
 

SStrikerR

Hall of Fame
Isner did not play anything special. Nadal put an horrible performance like he did against Lorenzi in Roma. Nadal should have crushed Isner if he played just at a little of his best level.

Not really. The way the clay was playing and with the new balls, he wouldn't. I didn't think this was news to anybody, but Isner is one of the toughest guys to break. His game not be flashy, but it's very effective. If he doesn't get broken, all he needs is to get lucky/play a really nice game and break Nadal once to win in a set, or win in a tiebreak. That's exactly what he did.
 

Tennis_Monk

Hall of Fame
Best to worst:

1. 2008 French Open
2. 2007 French Open
3. 2006 French Open
4. 2005 French Open
5. 2009 French Open
6. 2010 French Open
7. 2011 French Open


Federer in his prime would have lavished to play the Nadal that appeared in 2011 RG!

I dont disagree with Federer's wish to win more finals against Nadal but i dont think Federer would have lavished to Play any Nadal.No mature versions of Federer ever want to play Nadal.period.
 

kishnabe

Talk Tennis Guru
2009 above 2010 (and 11)?

Ya I know he didn't win that year....but I am counting his MS performances. They were reall good dog fights and he was defintly playing real will with the injuries than he was playing in 2010( easiest clay season ever) and 2011( depressed nadal)!
 

The-Champ

Legend
Best to worst:

1. 2008 French Open
2. 2007 French Open
3. 2006 French Open
4. 2005 French Open
5. 2009 French Open
6. 2010 French Open
7. 2011 French Open


Federer in his prime would have lavished to play the Nadal that appeared in 2011 RG!

I agree. Plus IMO any federer from 2005-2007 would have killed Nadal 2009-2011.
 

bolo

G.O.A.T.
2008 French Open
2007 French Open
2010 French Open
2011 French Open
2005 French Open
2006 French Open

pretty good. I will switch 2005 and 2011, but he brought himself up quite a bit towards the end of the 2011 tournament by upping the ante on defense. Nadal just has a lot more firepower and ways of winning points on all surfaces after 2006, but his defense and CC capital was on another level in 2005.
 

jackson vile

G.O.A.T.
How would you rank Nadal level of play he displayed when he won RG following the years?

Mine:

1) RG2008: His absolute best, winning the tournament without losing a set and crushing players like Verdasco, Almagro and even Federer in the final. He also easily beat Djokovic in straight set. He was on fire during this tournament.

2) RG2007: Another display of amazing tennis by Nadal. He only lost a set in the final to Federer when both were at their best. He also easily defeated Djokovic in the SF. He also crushed Moya in QF and easily beat Del Potro in the 1R and beat Hewitt in straight set.

3) RG2005: His first GS victory and first RG. At age 19 (at the end of the tournament), Nadal played an amazing tournament. Losing 3 sets and beating the like of Grosjean, Federer, Gasquet and Ferrer. and finally Puerta playing the tournament of his life like if he was possessed by Muster.

4)RG2006: He won the tournament and lost 3 sets too but overall he was not as good as in 2005. PHM and Hewitt gave him tough matchs and he defeated a Federer who was bleeding errors from his backhand 7-6 in the fourth.

5) RG 2010: Nadal did not lost a set during this tournament but he had an easy draw and played very average until the final where he raised his game and easily defeated Soderling for vengeance. But overall his level of play was not good eventhough it has to be noted that he never needed to raise his game.

6) RG2011: His worst level at RG (except 2009 of course) so far for me. The start was just a disaster. Losing two sets to an all serve Isner on clay. PLaying very badly against Andujar and putting an horrible display against Ljubicic, one of his worst match of his career at this tournament. For the last 3 matchs he raised his level and found back his tennis.
Against Soderling, Murray and Federer he put great performance that equal his level of 2005 and 2006 but who are still inferior to his 2008 and 2007 level.


His last two RG are the two last of my list. I hope he will turn that in 2012.


This right here
 

reversef

Hall of Fame
Best to worst:

1. 2008 French Open
2. 2007 French Open
3. 2005 French Open
4. 2010 French Open
5. 2006 French Open
6. 2011 French Open
7. 2009 French Open

Yeah, this is the order for me as well. 2008 is the best by far, 2007 is great too, in 2005 he's a rookie and an incredible one. He was not that great in 2006/2010, pretty bad in 2011 and 2009 (the difference being that in 2011, a healthy Nadal survived the first week and got the opportunity to improve, while in 2009, a physically limited Nadal lost to an on-fire Soderling and we'll never know what he would have done if he had gone through).
 

CHillTennis

Hall of Fame
Having seen them all I would rank them in the following order:

(From worst to best)

#11. Roland Garros 2011

style-2011-06-rafael-nadal-rafael-nadal-15.jpg


2011: If there were ever tournament that Nadal fell backwards into winning. The 2011 French Open would be it.

He didn't have the strongest showing at the clay court events leading in and he found himself in serious danger of losing to John Isner in the first round.

Isner had Nadal down 2 sets to 1 in this match. But a crucial change in tactics would give Nadal the break that he needed to get back in the match.

Isner tried to serve and volley against Nadal in the final two sets of this match. A tactic that would back-fire on him and allow Nadal to squeak by in five sets.

Having been spared a humbling first round loss, Nadal would make short work of his next three opponents.

In the quarter-finals he would face the hard hitting Robin Soderling

The pair had split their last two meetings at the French open and despite the fact that Soderling was the only man to have beaten Nadal at this tournament their match failed to live up to it's hype.

Nadal was able to get the job done in straight sets.

The semi-finals would prove to be critical for Nadal. Not so much for how he would fair against his opponent Andy Murray but rather who he would face in the finals on the other side of the draw.

Roger Federer would defeat Novak Djokovic in four sets to end Novak's unbeaten streak of over 40 matches.

This undoubtedly played a huge factor in the outcome of the tournament.

Despite having never won a grand slam match against Nadal, Novak Djokovic would have been considered the favorite to win in a potential finals meeting between them.

Instead, Nadal was able to retain his title as French Open champion against his long-time rival Roger Federer.

Federer would not go down quietly and he held a set-point at 5-2 in the first set and would eventually go on to take the third set from Nadal before losing in four sets.

By no means was this a match that Federer should have lost in four. I think Nadal was very lucky that Fed's drop-shot was called out. Otherwise he might very well have lost to Roger on this day. He was being out-played by him for most of the first three sets.

#10 Roland Garros 2013

article-2337494-1A33B7A7000005DC-107_634x458.jpg



2013: While 2013 will be remembered as a strong year for Rafael Nadal it wasn't without it's fair share of ups and downs for the Spaniard.

Nadal started his clay court season off with by reach the finals of Vina del Mar where he lost to journeyman Heracio Zellbios in three sets.

The struggles for Nadal against journeyman players would continue into the French Open where he lost the opening sets in his matches against Daniel Brands of Germany and Martin Klizan of Slovakia.

Things would eventually start to get back on track as he was able to defeat his next three opponents: Fabio Fognini, Kei Nishikori, and Stanislas Wawrinka all in straight
sets.

Due to being seeded third, he would face Novak Djokovic in the semi-finals.

This time their match would go the distance. With Djokovic leading 4-3 in the decider (and being on the verge of dethroning the King of Clay) an uncharacteristically bad service game would allow Nadal to get the break back against Djokovic and eventually prevail 6–4, 3–6, 6–1, 6–7, 9–7.

Nadal would go on to win his eighth French Open after easily defeating his countryman David Ferrer in the finals 6-3, 6-2, 6-3.

#9 Roland Garros 2006


On paper the 2006 clay court season looks to be one of Nadal's best.

Between April-June of that year he won 24 consecutive matches, including no titles. He suffered no losses on clay during that season and defeated both Novak Djokovic and Roger Federer on his way to claiming his second French Open title.

His performance at the tournament, however, was a different matter.

On Nadal's 20th birthday he would face off with the very talented Paul Henri Mathieu.

Mathieu, who had the misfortune of being labeled a choker of big matches, seemed determined to disprove the doubters.

If it wasn't bad enough that he was facing an inspired opponent, who had nothing to lose against him, Nadal's trademark shots weren't working for him and he found himself in a bit of a hole against Mathieu. Nadal's

There were moments where it looked as though the Frenchman might pull off the upset. But Nadal had just enough craft to be able to stave off the danger and was able to get the job done in four sets.

In the finals, he would face off with Roger Federer, who was going for his fourth consecutive grand slam title.

Once again Nadal's game abandoned him and he dropped the first set to Federer 6-1.

Then in a bizarre reversal, Federer would lose his concentration early on in the second set. Allowing Nadal to trade 6-1 sets with him and level the match at a set-a-piece.

With the momentum now shifting over in Nadal's favor he would take advantage of a weak service game from Roger to break serve and win the third set 6-3. The fourth set would fall to Nadal in a tie-breaker, thus giving him his second grand slam title.

A remarkable achievement for the 20 year old Spaniard but definitely not one of his better showings at the French Open.
 
Last edited:

CHillTennis

Hall of Fame
#8 Roland Garros 2014

1253307-27057630-2560-1440.jpg


Having had a mediocre clay court season (by his standards) leading-in. Nadal would surge his way through to the quarter-finals of the 2014 French Open where he would get his first real test of the tournament against David Ferrer.

Ferrer had been easily defeated in their encounter just one year earlier but this time would be much different as David swept the opening set from him 6-4 and came close to taking a two sets to love lead over Nadal.

After winning the second set, Nadal would regain control of the match and was able to finish off Ferrer in 4-6, 6-4, 6-0, 6-1 to book himself a place in the semi-finals with Andy Murray.

Nadal steam-rolled Murray in straight sets and would face Novak Djokovic for the trophy.

Like Ferrer did before him, Djokovic easily took the first set off of Nadal and the outcome of the match seemed to ride on the second set.

With his back up against the wall, Nadal would fight his way back to level the match at one set all.

The third set went to Nadal convincingly 6-2 and with a two sets to one lead he was able to finish off Djokovic 6-4 in the fourth to win his 9th French Open title.

Overall this was a solid performance by Nadal. He never had to go beyond four sets in any of his matches. But his rival, Novak Djokovic, had a real chance of winning the title this year.

#7 Roland Garros 2005


Having been forced to skip the French Open during his first two years on the tour Nadal would burst onto the scene in the spring of 2005. Dazzling the competition with his trademark defense to offense skills and cat-like quickness around the court. This may have been Nadal's first grand slam but it was a long ways from his best showing at the tournament.

Despite losing just two sets on his way to the finals, Nadal found himself in serious danger against Mariano Puerta of Argentina. He looked very human at times in this match and even his Uncle Toni admitted that he was lucky to have won the match against Puerta.

#6 Roland Garros 2018

stream_img.jpg


His most recent win at the French. From a performance stand-point he was on par with his level from 2017 but the caliber of opponent's that he faced was a little less. No grand slam champions like Stanislas Wawrinka or players that had beaten him before like Robin Soderling. The final against Thiem, while highly entertaining, was unfortunately a little too one sided.

#5 Roland Garros 2007


Nadal's third championship year follows a similar story to his win there in 2008.

Which would see him face off with Djokovic and Federer on his way to winning the trophy.

However, his performance at RG 07 doesn't even come close to the level of domination that we would see just one year later.

Back in these days, Nadal was still considered beatable at this tournament.

Although, it appeared to be just about impossible for anyone besides Federer to think about doing it.

In the end though, even the mighty Fed wasn't up to the task, as he fell to Nadal in four sets.

It's a shame that Roger seemed to go for years believing that he didn't have what it takes to beat Nadal on clay.

I don't believe he was ever the same after losing this final.

More to come tomorrow!
 
Last edited:

BGod

G.O.A.T.
It's funny but I'd say his last 2 are at the bottom. 2017 in particular was a steaming pile. Especially when you know Wawrinka was injured. He literally beat up both years on tomato cans, mental midget Thiem and pigeons.

1. 2008
2. 2007
3. 2010
4. 2006
5. 2005
6. 2012
7. 2011
8. 2014
9. 2013
10. 2018
11. 2017

Really feeds into Nadal's immortality here as his later years clearly below he's still able to cake walk.

I think it ends this year though.
 

CHillTennis

Hall of Fame
#4. 2017 Roland Garros

2097143-43938070-2560-1440.jpg



2017 was without question a special year for Nadal. This was his first French Open title in three years. His road to winning this title was nothing short of incredible! Winning every set that he played while never being pushed beyond 6-4 in any of those sets!

Seriously! How is that even possible?!

US-Open-2018-Roger-Federer-says-stunning-shot-against-Nick-Kyrgios-was-special.jpg



After crushing Stanislas Wawrinka in the finals it was evident that Rafael Nadal was back and here to stay!

#3 Roland Garros 2012

Rafael+Nadal+2012+French+Open+Day+Sixteen+OD0jKtrwgejl.jpg


The 2012 clay court season was a very interesting time in the world of men's tennis.

We were just coming off of a stunning 15 month stretch where Novak Djokovic was absolutely shredding the competition.

Having beaten Nadal in their last seven meetings (including a brutal one in Australia, just a couple of months earlier) tennis was beginning to take a slightly lower precedence in Novak's life as he was going through a very tough time having just lost his grandfather.

The Nadal camp knew that they needed to make some changes and went to work on a plan to change Rafael's serving patterns when facing Djokovic.

Nadal has always liked to serve to the backhand of his opponents. But in the first match of the season on clay Nadal served consistently to Novak's forehand.

It won him Monte Carlo.

A few weeks later they would play in the finals of Rome with Nadal winning again.

Having gotten on a role against Djokovic he set to work on stopping him from completing the Djoker slam when they met in the finals of the French Open.

Both players were playing at an incredibly high level but Nadal was a little bit better on clay. He won the first set convincingly and managed to eek out the second. However, Djokovic came raging back in set three and was up a break in the beginning of the fourth set before the match was stopped due to the weather. When play resumed Nadal was able to get the break back from Djokovic and eventually prevailed in four.

I rate this match high on Nadal's performance list simply due to his willingness to adapt and try new tactics.

#2 Roland Garros 2010

Rafael+Nadal+2010+French+Open+Day+Seven+6POIJu0UJywl.jpg


It should come as no surprise that Nadal's best season on tour would also feature one of his best performances at Roland Garros.

This would be the only time in the stretch between 2005-11 that would win the tournament without facing Federer.

The man that he would face instead was the only player to have beaten him at Roland Garros.

Robin Soderling.

Deemed to be a grudge match. Soderling was swept aside by Nadal in three competitive but fairly straight forward sets.

This was Nadal's second time winning Roland Garros without dropping a set.

#1 Roland Garros 2008


When you think about a player that is "feeling it" or "in the zone" Rafael Nadal's 2008 French Open title run is probably going to come to mind.

From a performance stand-point this is about as good as it gets.

Nadal broke on average in fifty percent of his return games during the championship.

He badly outplayed Djokovic in their semi-final match and made Roger look like he didn't even belong there with him.

I have never seen a player that was able to humble the mighty Federer, during his prime years, at a tournament like this that carried so much importance to him.

I think what also makes RG '08 a special one for Nadal is the fact that he had somewhat mixed results leading in.

He was dominant in winning the first two clay court tournaments, Monte Carlo and Barcelona, but he hit a potential road-block when he fell to Juan Carlos Ferrero in Rome. Nadal would bounce back a few weeks later when he won his first title in Hamburg. Though he struggled to make it past Djokovic and Federer.

Given the shaky start that he'd had during the season so far. Nadal looked like he might be more vulnerable than usual at that year's French Open.

Instead, he did what a champion does and found a way to play at his best, when the chips were down and his back was up against the wall.

This tournament completely turned around the outlook of Nadal's season. After winning so convincingly over Roger Federer there was talk that he might go on to win Wimbledon. One thing lead to another and by the end of the season he was ranked #1 in the world and had officially proven that he wasn't limitted to just winning majors on clay.

I believe this tournament gave him that belief and that's why I put it as #1 on his list.
 

Raining hopes

Hall of Fame
2017
2013
2012
2018
2014
2011
2010
2008
2007
2006
2005

@Lew II You sure about this ? 2008 RG Nadal is as close to being invincible I have seen any tennis player go.I am pretty sure the stats reflect this too.
2007,2012,2013(last 2 matches) also almost reached the same heights.
2010,2006,2017 were pretty good too.

2011,2014,2018 he was somewhat beatable

Don't know much about 2005, I haven't watched anything except the Fedal semifinals.
 
D

Deleted member 716271

Guest
@Lew II You sure about this ? 2008 RG Nadal is as close to being invincible I have seen any tennis player go.I am pretty sure the stats reflect this too.
2007,2012,2013(last 2 matches) also almost reached the same heights.
2010,2006,2017 were pretty good too.

2011,2014,2018 he was somewhat beatable

Don't know much about 2005, I haven't watched anything except the Fedal semifinals.

2008 RG was maybe the best single tournament I have ever seen from a player!
 

Lew II

G.O.A.T.
@Lew II You sure about this ? 2008 RG Nadal is as close to being invincible I have seen any tennis player go.I am pretty sure the stats reflect this too.
2007,2012,2013(last 2 matches) also almost reached the same heights.
2010,2006,2017 were pretty good too.

2011,2014,2018 he was somewhat beatable

Don't know much about 2005, I haven't watched anything except the Fedal semifinals.

2008 baby Djokovic played a close match.

Djokovic in 2012-14 was a lot stronger but he couldn't beat Nadal. Therefore I think 2012-14 Nadal played better than 2008.
 

Raining hopes

Hall of Fame
2008 baby Djokovic played a close match.

Djokovic in 2012-14 was a lot stronger but he couldn't beat Nadal. Therefore I think 2012-14 Nadal played better than 2008.

2012 is the only year that deserves a mention , other than that I have absolutely no idea how you are reaching this conclusion.
Especially with 2014.

Also mind you 2008 Djokovic just had had one of his very best runs in AO.
 

Lew II

G.O.A.T.
2012 is the only year that deserves a mention , other than that I have absolutely no idea how you are reaching this conclusion.
Especially with 2014.

Also mind you 2008 Djokovic just had had one of his very best runs in AO.

2013 and 2014 Nadal beat great players, why do you rate him so low?

2013: wawrinka, djokovic, ferrer
2014: ferrer, murray, djokovic

Djokovic, Murray, Ferrer and Wawrinka are clearly the top-4 claycourters since 2010 a part from Nadal.
 

Raining hopes

Hall of Fame
2013 and 2014 Nadal beat great players, why do you rate him so low?

2013: wawrinka, djokovic, ferrer
2014: ferrer, murray, djokovic

Djokovic, Murray, Ferrer and Wawrinka are clearly the top-4 claycourters since 2010 a part from Nadal.

Because I have eyes.And 2013 last two matches were great from him so was 2014's sf but other years I rated above them were better as a whole.
 

Lew II

G.O.A.T.
Average ranking of players met in the last 3 rounds

2005: 19.7
2006: 22.7
2007: 11
2008: 8
2010: 18.3
2011: 4
2012: 6.7
2013: 5.3
2014: 5
2017: 10.3
2018: 8.7

2011 > 2014 > 2013 > 2012 > 2008 > 2018 > 2017 > 2007 > 2010 > 2005 > 2006
 

BGod

G.O.A.T.
Average ranking of players met in the last 3 rounds

2005: 19.7
2006: 22.7
2007: 11
2008: 8
2010: 18.3
2011: 4
2012: 6.7
2013: 5.3
2014: 5
2017: 10.3
2018: 8.7

2011 > 2014 > 2013 > 2012 > 2008 > 2018 > 2017 > 2007 > 2010 > 2005 > 2006

You're insane. The main difference between 08, 11 and 14 is that in 11 & 14 Nadal got Andy Murray in the semifinal and then 2011 Federer and 2014 Djokovic. Now we can go up and down on Djokovic 2008 but Federer 2008 is the best player of all the 6. Nadal obliterated that player. Now Djokovic in 2014 is mentally shot while 08 version is fresh and confident with USO Final and AO victory. He won Rome, retired in MC to Federer and lost in 3 to Nadal at Madrid. Couple that with Nadal's absolute butchering of Almagro and Verdasco in the R16 and quarter and you have a no contest.
 

NatF

Bionic Poster
Average ranking of players met in the last 3 rounds

2005: 19.7
2006: 22.7
2007: 11
2008: 8
2010: 18.3
2011: 4
2012: 6.7
2013: 5.3
2014: 5
2017: 10.3
2018: 8.7

2011 > 2014 > 2013 > 2012 > 2008 > 2018 > 2017 > 2007 > 2010 > 2005 > 2006

Thanks for showing again that you don't know what you're talking about :-D
 

Lew II

G.O.A.T.
Thanks for showing again that you don't know what you're talking about :-D

2011-15 were the greatest years for tennis, everyone knows it. 3 or 4 peak Big4 in each year.

2017-18 is 10 years more modern tennis than baby Nadal's era, so I think that was a better version of Nadal too.
 

Raining hopes

Hall of Fame
2011-15 were the greatest years for tennis, everyone knows it. 3 or 4 peak Big4 in

each year.

2017-18 is 10 years more modern tennis than baby Nadal's era, so I think that was a better version of Nadal too.

So Federer actually leads the better version of Nadal by 5-0 ?
 

NatF

Bionic Poster
2011-15 were the greatest years for tennis, everyone knows it. 3 or 4 peak Big4 in each year.

2017-18 is 10 years more modern tennis than baby Nadal's era, so I think that was a better version of Nadal too.

lol whatever you say.

I wouldn't even call what you produced an analysis but whatever it is it's bad. The average ranking of the opponents doesn't say anything about how Nadal actually played - you'd need to watch the matches, look at the scorelines and see the stats for that. Not to mention average is a pretty crappy metric where one lower ranked player can skew the whole thing...

Everytime you post I'm more convinced that you've actually watched very little tennis...
 

Lew II

G.O.A.T.
lol whatever you say.

I wouldn't even call what you produced an analysis but whatever it is it's bad. The average ranking of the opponents doesn't say anything about how Nadal actually played - you'd need to watch the matches, look at the scorelines and see the stats for that. Not to mention average is a pretty crappy metric where one lower ranked player can skew the whole thing...

Everytime you post I'm more convinced that you've actually watched very little tennis...

I posted the number of wins over top-10 in the other thread (there's no reason to have two threads about it).
 
Top