Defended a non clay title?
Defended a non clay title?
I wonder if they have defended clay titles though? lol
Imma guess that Fed, Kuerten, Hewitt, Agassi, Stich, Corretja, McEnroe and Edberg, and Lendl probably have.
I wonder if they have defended clay titles though? lol
Has Federer defended a clay title? I think Djoker hasn't, though he may repeat at the Serbian Open this year!
I'm willing to bet Rafa will end up retiring having defended more hardcourt events than Federer has defended clay events.
He should, seeing as there's twice as many hard court tournaments a year than there are clay.
won the year end championship........
I know, it's a shame. If there were as many clay slams as there are hardcourt slams, Rafa would be on the way to 20 slams.
What a coincidence ! There was a much loved poaster named bullzilla and later another much loved poaster named nadalwon2012 who used to say pretty much the same thing. You wouldn't know them because you weren't around when they poasted. So glad to have someone with similar thoughts among us as we have been missing them a lot.
I've seen both of them, I've been here for a year.
I've seen both of them, I've been here for a year.
LAWL ! Add VamosFire to the list.I reckon all 3 of you see each other all the time..
In the Mirror...
I'm willing to bet Rafa will end up retiring having defended more hardcourt events than Federer has defended clay events.
I'm willing to bet Rafa will end up retiring having defended more hardcourt events than Federer has defended clay events.
I know, it's a shame. If there were as many clay slams as there are hardcourt slams, Rafa would be on the way to 20 slams.
Well, so far looks like Fed is ahead of rafa!
Imagine if there were twice as many slams on hard as there are now. Nadal would have 2 slams. Many these hypotheticals sure are fun aren't they BullLost2012toinfinityandbeyond?
Except if there were two slams on clay, most players would focus on honing their clay skills too and would probably grow up playing on the surface consistently which puts your " Nadal would've had 20 slams" theory out of the window. Also, it would make Nadal winning a career slam that much harder as it would offer him basically very little transition time on his least favourite surface.I know, it's a shame. If there were as many clay slams as there are hardcourt slams, Rafa would be on the way to 20 slams.