ooh young delpo with longish hair haha
Juan Martin del Awesome.
Look who is sitting on a USO title and look who has jack. Says it all.
Juan Martin del Awesome.
Oh sure, coz everyone knows Murray has won nothing at all!
Oh...hang on a minute!
Still enjoyable, and has led to other videos being posted for people's enjoyment. It's actually a fun thread, that, besides you, isn't affected by the general idiocy of this board. If you think it's pointless, do us all a favor and turn off your computer instead of sharing your opinion that nobody cares about.Very old and been played on here numerous times!
Yet another pointless thread.
Slams are everything. Nobody remembers what Rios won, people just remember what he didn't win: a slam. At the moment it's the same for Murray.
Still enjoyable, and has led to other videos being posted for people's enjoyment. It's actually a fun thread, that, besides you, isn't affected by the general idiocy of this board. If you think it's pointless, do us all a favor and turn off your computer instead of sharing your opinion that nobody cares about.
Look who is sitting on a USO title and look who has jack. Says it all.
Slams are everything. Nobody remembers what Rios won, people just remember what he didn't win: a slam. At the moment it's the same for Murray.
But people do remember that Rios got to world number 1
Which is why Del Potro owns Murray to a winning percentage of 16.7%.
Winning percentage in slam finals.
Del potro = 100%
Murray = 0%. Hasn't won a set. Not one set. I repeat. Not a single set.
remind me, how many slam finals has JMDP actually reached?
as for the head to head, lol, no contest..
http://www.atpworldtour.com/Players/Head-To-Head.aspx?pId=MC10&oId=D683
Murray up 5 - 1 so far....
Del Potro such a joke. A footnote in history alongside Orantes, Edmonson and co...
1 > 0
That's all. first player ever to beat nadal and federer back to back in a slam.
remind me, how many slam finals has JMDP actually reached?
as for the head to head, lol, no contest..
http://www.atpworldtour.com/Players/Head-To-Head.aspx?pId=MC10&oId=D683
Murray up 5 - 1 so far....
Del Potro such a joke. A footnote in history alongside Orantes, Edmonson and co...
oh, right, so I guess I should file him in teh same place as Adrianno Pannatta then?
(only person to ever beat Borg in Paris. What do you mean you've never heard of him?? )
i think this one from the söderking was even better tho
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k2K8i_jpzEw
Wish they had the ability to show the hawk eye replay for clay just to get these arguments out of the way.
both of these are fantastic. Soderlings voice did not sound like what I thought it would
Am I the only one who can't hear the audio on this video? :???:
My browser updates Flash automatically so I should be able to hear it. Yes, I checked the volume.
Wait, are you guys saying that Del Potro has 1 grand slam title while Murray has 0 grand slam titles?
Because that's news to me.
Don't mind him. Blinky is just being a Muurya-hater as usual :roll:Yep. It's old news, really.
Don't mind him. Blinky is just being a Muurya-hater as usual :roll:
Blinky is actually Lendl :shock: Sly........ :twisted:Blinky is Lendl's advisor.
Blinky is actually Lendl :shock: Sly........ :twisted:
The umpire needs to learn a thing or two in communicating with players. He made it looks like it was 'in' by his initial reaction. Andy thought the umpire called it 'in'. That reaction was just natural from Andy.
If I was incharge, I would fire that umpire right away.
In addition to that, the mark that the umpire indicated was incorrect. So although Murray won the point, he won it, on a wrong call. It was a different mark.
It is about getting things right. Umpires cannot always get away doing wrong things. Andy didn't like that. He reacted like any normal person, who feels he was cheated, would.
And it was ridiculous for Davydenko to laugh at it.