All of Feds slams Pre-Nadal were BORING

RF20Lennon

Legend
Just read posts #32, 37, 38, and 48 in this very same thread.
To witness TDK greatness in eloquence! How he would flip-flop between the few posts.
Just give him enough rope to hang himself, would you?
Have mercy on his T DARK K soul!

LOL what is this guy even doing here?? he should be a politician fantastic flip flopper
 
I assume you're talking about the 1980 Wimbledon final? It's a good match, but I actually prefer the previous year's final between Borg and Tanner. Tanner's performance is one of the best in a major final for an eventual loser.

You mean under the lights when he served so hard that he literally broke the net chord? Yeah thy was great....

But I'm talking about finals......there's no bigger stage than a Wimbledon final .
 
Post #17 and post #18 (your own words):"Was there tennis from 2003-2006? I must have missed it ."
Now claiming the Borg-McEnroe game exciting. Didn't it happen before 03-06?
Hard to keep up straight with all your arguments when you spew things out from both sides of your mouth, isn't it?

BTW, in response to your comment in post #18, here what I wrote, "Your comment showed us the TREMENDOUS DEPTH of your knowledge about tennis."
I have NOT changed my opinion yet.

Yes ....Borg and McEnroe did not play from 2003-2006.

I never said "Before" 2003.

You really make me look good
 

TMF

Talk Tennis Guru
And Federer would be on 20+ if not for Nadal :)
Nadal would be on 14 majors now if Djesus hadn't made an appearance. Grrrrr :evil:

QFT.

Take away just one player can change the outcome dramatically. Also, guys like Roddick/Hewitt/Murray are unlucky to play in the same generation. I believe they would have won some slams in another generation.

Fed denied Hewitt, Roddick, Murray
Nadal denied Murray
Nole denied Murray
 
Post #17 and post #18 (your own words):"Was there tennis from 2003-2006? I must have missed it ."
Now claiming the Borg-McEnroe game exciting. Didn't it happen before 03-06?
Hard to keep up straight with all your arguments when you spew things out from both sides of your mouth, isn't it?

BTW, in response to your comment in post #18, here what I wrote, "Your comment showed us the TREMENDOUS DEPTH of your knowledge about tennis."
I have NOT changed my opinion yet.

TDK said:
Yes ....Borg and McEnroe did not play from 2003-2006.

I never said "Before" 2003.

You really make me look good

V Phuck

Actually I have another analogy .....

You make me look good for the same reason Fed looked so good From 2003-2006:

NO COMPETITION. :)
 

VPhuc tennis fan

Professional
Have you actually read Phucks posts? I think I have blasted him off the court. :)
Wow, I see that now you're past boasting about Rafa's stuff.
Now, it's PERSONAL boasting! Wouahhh!
As I previously said and I said it again here:

There is Fed haters, and there is ...TDK.

Enough said for you?

Allow me to add this: FO 2009. You know that will NEVER go AWAY no matter what lies you can spew out now and on, don't you?

Also the 'k' at the end of my name, yup another of your genius priceless trick to show off your true face! Very subtle, indeed:)
There is Fed haters, and there is ...TDK.
 

Mustard

Bionic Poster
You mean under the lights when he served so hard that he literally broke the net chord? Yeah thy was great....

But I'm talking about finals......there's no bigger stage than a Wimbledon final .

I'm talking about the 1979 Wimbledon final. Borg beat Tanner 6-7, 6-1, 3-6, 6-3, 6-4. Tanner played a fantastic match and really had Borg on the ropes. Even when Borg got the early break in the fifth set, Tanner was breathing down Borg's neck in threatening to break back, but Borg managed to hold on, just, and finally won the title.

The match under the lights where Tanner broke the net with his serve was a quarter final of the 1979 US Open, in which Tanner beat Borg 6-2, 4-6, 6-2, 7-6. Tanner was serving for the match at 5-3 in the fourth set at deuce, when the net came down. When they eventually repaired the net, Borg broke Tanner's serve and it ended up going to a tiebreak, which Tanner won.
 
I'm talking about the 1979 Wimbledon final. Borg beat Tanner 6-7, 6-1, 3-6, 6-3, 6-4. Tanner played a fantastic match and really had Borg on the ropes. Even when Borg got the early break in the fifth set, Tanner was breathing down Borg's neck in threatening to break back, but Borg managed to hold on, just, and finally won the title.

The match under the lights where Tanner broke the net with his serve was a quarter final of the 1979 US Open, in which Tanner beat Borg 6-2, 4-6, 6-2, 7-6. Tanner was serving for the match at 5-3 in the fourth set at deuce, when the net came down. When they eventually repaired the net, Borg broke Tanner's serve and it ended up going to a tiebreak, which Tanner won.

I didn't see that one....sounds great !
 

VPhuc tennis fan

Professional
Hey Phuck

I miss you .

Your from the weak era . I'm gonna look like a goat.
Now that Rafa is out of Wimby, what are you going to do?:confused:
A long time between now and USO, isn't it?
Take a break, take a walk, watch some re-runs (I wouldn't recommend the FO 2009 final though, that may be too much for you).
Go away. Leave the forum to other more decent posters, don't you agree?
NOBODY will miss you!
:)
 
Top