frinton
Professional
This Poll and Thread is in reply to "Isn't it amazing how Fed fans hate Nadal but Nadal fans don't hate Joker" --> http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showthread.php?t=430351
This Poll and Thread is in reply to "Isn't it amazing how Fed fans hate Nadal but Nadal fans don't hate Joker" --> http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showthread.php?t=430351
I don't hate the player. I hate the fanboys and ****s.
I don't hate any of the players. I love Federer and his game, I admire Djokovic's game, am indifferent toward's Murray's, and don't particularly like Nadal's. I respect all of them and their achievements.
It's the fans (****s, really) that are irritating, from all fan groups. I can definitely see how fans can ruin the image and perception of the players themselves.
i voted.
10 votes
Were you truthful and if so chose option 2
I don't hate any of the players. I love Federer and his game, I admire Djokovic's game, am indifferent toward's Murray's, and don't particularly like Nadal's. I respect all of them and their achievements.
It's the fans (****s, really) that are irritating, from all fan groups. I can definitely see how fans can ruin the image and perception of the players themselves.
I'm a Djoker fan, but also like Fed and Murray. Not so keen on Nadal, but still can't deny he's an all time great.
From general experience, Murray seems to have the best fanbase (maybe because he hasn't won a slam yet?). There is a constant level of Murray bashing on these forums, but they don't take the bait. It's quite admirable.
I don't hate any of the players. I love Federer and his game, I admire Djokovic's game, am indifferent toward's Murray's, and don't particularly like Nadal's. I respect all of them and their achievements.
It's the fans (****s, really) that are irritating, from all fan groups. I can definitely see how fans can ruin the image and perception of the players themselves.
Agree totally. The fans of whatever player who are so blinded by the adoration they have for that player and can't see said player's faults, make me want to puke.
Yes, like after almost getting beaten by some unknown players twice in a row, they still believe their idol is gonna win against the #1 in the world which is in very great form. Their idol's magic has not appeared anywhere lately but will definitely come into place when facing currently the best player on earth. They are blinded by their adoration and his idol's past glories and can just forget all his idol's faults (like playing sh!tty against non-top player), which really makes people want to puke.
Get off your high horse. I agree with you that Djokovic is currently a better player than Federer and that Federer will likely lose if he meets Djokovic in the SF but there is always a chance, no matter how small, that Federer could appear in God-mode on that particular day at a tournament he has won 6 previous times whereas Djokovic has only one it once. I would say Djokovic has an 80% chance of beating Federer if they meet, but I would never say Djokovic has a 100% chance and if you do, good for you.
Novak is the best player on earth? If that is so, why didn't he win the FO against Nadal and why did Novak lose three clay tournaments in a row to Nadal this year. Also, where was Novak at Indian Wells this year? I believe he lost to Isner in the SF and Federer went on to defeat Nadal for that title is that correct? In addition, how many titles has Novak won in 2012? Two right. How many has Federer won? Four. How is it that an old man at almost 31 has won more titles than the best player this year according to you? I know Djokovic won a slam and Federer did not, but still.
Yes, like after almost getting beaten by some unknown players twice in a row, they still believe their idol is gonna win against the #1 in the world which is in very great form. Their idol's magic has not appeared anywhere lately but will definitely come into place when facing currently the best player on earth. They are blinded by their adoration and his idol's past glories and can just forget all his idol's faults (like playing sh!tty against non-top player), which really makes people want to puke.
Didn't you still believe Djokovic could beat the current and all time greatest clay court player even after he almost lost to Seppi and average clay courter Tsonga? A bit biased methinks..
Djokovic is favourite no doubt, but judging by the 5 slam meetings from 2010 US Open onwards, two were Straight sets wins for Djokovic in very easy fashion, one was a win for Federer, 2 were 5 set wins for Djokovic that could have gone both ways. If only Novak had double faulted against Federer instead of Nadal (at the French this year) Novak might have never lost to Nadal in a slam final.. but oh well.
Djokovic hasn't looked that great all the way through, himself. Losing a set to oldman Steppy? Old man Fed will probably win a set, especially if it goes to a tiebreak. But you never know, he has a small chance at the win. laugh all you want, but I wasn't laughing when Federer chose the French Open 2011 semi to play vintage tennis and take out the guy I was rooting for. Why Federer, why? Why couldn't you just lose that time?
I suspect you weren't laughing either :lol: