What do you think?
I think Djokovic can, but won't.
Pretty much sums up my thoughts. Nadal is only a year older than Djokovic (and Murray) so there's plenty of time for Djokovic to be denied.
What do you think?
Pretty much sums up my thoughts. Nadal is only a year older than Djokovic (and Murray) so there's plenty of time for Djokovic to be denied.
2012 is still not decided....it a 2 man race between Fedovic.
No one expected Federer to go on an unbeaten run in the indoor season in 2011 after dropping to #4. Wouldn't surprise me if Nadal snatched the ranking away from Murray right at the end of the year.
No one expected Federer to go on an unbeaten run in the indoor season in 2011 after dropping to #4. Wouldn't surprise me if Nadal snatched the ranking away from Murray right at the end of the year.
Federer never dropped to number 4.
Been living under a rock for 3 months, eh? Nadal may not play for the rest of the year, and it's already the longest he's been off tour since turning pro.
IE, not a good sign for his return to the top.
I don't think Nadal would care about returning to the top. His goal has always been the slams. Winning the first 3 slams of 2013 would be more important than returning to the top. The only other goal I've heard him mention apart from slams is the 2016 Olympics. Actually, the 2016 Olympics is all I've heard him talk about achievements-wise in the last 2 months.
He is not going to win the first three slams of 2013, I do think he is not done winning slams however, he just won't dominate the way he did in 2010.
In addition, the Olympic 2016 goal is just what is being thrown out there by Nadal's handlers. It does not mean he will actually make it to that point. He has just stated himself he has no idea how long he will play tennis for so we should not claim to know either. It could be four years or it could be a year, nobody knows.
Well if Nadal wins the Australian Open 2013, that makes it the first 2 slams of 2013. So, first 3 is very possible, given his record at Wimbledon, and given that Murray/Federer were both unconvincing at this year's Wimbledon. And I think Nadal will consider the AO "unfinished business" after what happened this year vs Djokovic.
You are getting way too ahead of yourself. Murray and Federer were not unconvincing at all at Wimbledon this year, they were both playing extremely well. Nadal will have more competition now off of clay with Federer, Djokovic and now a reinvigorated Murray.
I think Nadal will likely win a few more slams but I don't think he will win three in a row and dominate any longer like he did in 2010. Hard to say for sure right now who will win the AO in 2013. I don't think it will be Federer, but it could easily be Djokovic, Murray or even Nadal (although I would put him third on the list right now.)
Well if Nadal wins the Australian Open 2013, that makes it the first 2 slams of 2013. So, first 3 is very possible, given his record at Wimbledon, and given that Murray/Federer were both unconvincing at this year's Wimbledon. And I think Nadal will consider the AO "unfinished business" after what happened this year vs Djokovic.
Federer at Wimbledon looked better than Nadal at any Wimbledon other than 2007/2008/2010. So did Murray at the Olympics.
Now that's comedy.
Did you see Federer vs that Benn guy? Laughable. And the Wimbledon final wasn't the highest quality final of the year even. It was full of Murray's missed opportunities.
He is not going to win the first three slams of 2013, I do think he is not done winning slams however, he just won't dominate the way he did in 2010.
In 2009, Nadal lost early in a slam and skipped the next slam.
In 2012, Nadal lost early in a slam and skipped the next slam.
In 2009, Nadal won one slam.
In 2012, Nadal won one slam.
Due to Nadal's 2009, he dropped to #4.
Due to Nadal's 2012, he dropped to #4.
After Nadal's 2009, he became the first male player to win slams on clay, grass and hard-court all in a calendar year, and became the youngest player ever to win the career golden slam.
After Nadal's 2012, he will become the first male player to win the calendar year grand slam on three different surfaces.
In 2009, Nadal lost early in a slam and skipped the next slam.
In 2012, Nadal lost early in a slam and skipped the next slam.
In 2009, Nadal won one slam.
In 2012, Nadal won one slam.
Due to Nadal's 2009, he dropped to #4.
Due to Nadal's 2012, he dropped to #4.
After Nadal's 2009, he became the first male player to win slams on clay, grass and hard-court all in a calendar year, and became the youngest player ever to win the career golden slam.
After Nadal's 2012, he will become the first male player to win the calendar year grand slam on three different surfaces.
In 2009, Nadal lost early in a slam and skipped the next slam.
In 2012, Nadal lost early in a slam and skipped the next slam.
In 2009, Nadal won one slam.
In 2012, Nadal won one slam.
Due to Nadal's 2009, he dropped to #4.
Due to Nadal's 2012, he dropped to #4.
After Nadal's 2009, he became the first male player to win slams on clay, grass and hard-court all in a calendar year, and became the youngest player ever to win the career golden slam.
After Nadal's 2012, he will become the first male player to win the calendar year grand slam on three different surfaces.
I highly doubt it. I still think Nadal will end atleast 1 more year at #1, Murray will end atleast 1 year at #1, and Federer might even end this year at #2. Djokovic isnt such a dominant player to pull off something like that.
I highly doubt it. I still think Nadal will end atleast 1 more year at #1, Murray will end atleast 1 year at #1, and Federer might even end this year at #2. Djokovic isnt such a dominant player to pull off something like that.
Though I see Delpo being number 1 in 2014, but not finishing the year as 1 maybe.
I agree with this. Though the rankings don't matter as much for Nadal as they do for Federer, since Nadal is only focused on racking up the slams, and Nadal knows that regardless of his seed he can still dominate the other players in the slams to win the title.
I agree. He already is the greatest number two in world history, so mission accomplished. It's not like he has a prayer in becoming the greatest number one, so it shouldn't matter to him.
Greatest number one if Nadal wins 17+ slams and accomplishes the Calendar Year Grand Slam in 2013 (he'll be the first male player to do this on three different surfaces by the way). Nadal doesn't need a ranking to define him. That's what makes him so great.
Greatest number one if Nadal wins 17+ slams and accomplishes the Calendar Year Grand Slam in 2013 (he'll be the first male player to do this on three different surfaces by the way). Nadal doesn't need a ranking to define him. That's what makes him so great.
Greatest number one if Nadal wins 17+ slams and accomplishes the Calendar Year Grand Slam in 2013 (he'll be the first male player to do this on three different surfaces by the way).
I doubt it. Let's see first if he can do 2 consecutive years. Not at all obvious, we're less than 3 months from the end and he's #2.What do you think?