Sampras/Becker would probably have to play three 5-set matches to accumulate 95 UEs!
yeah, and at least they'd be making UEs trying to be aggressive and hit winners as opposed to running out of gas after a 60 shot rally.
Being Easter and all, what would you pick? Sitting through Murray Ferrer or… crucifixion. I'm thinking....
This is better. It just is.
In honor of this match I went out after and had a 2 hr practice. Thought of Murray and aimed a little higher over the net with my FH. Never saw him hit so many relatively easy FHs into the net.
The sad part is the ATP will not read any of the comments about this match on the internet. Business as usual until ticket sales and TV ratings tank for an extended period.
Being Easter and all, what would you pick? Sitting through Murray Ferrer or… crucifixion. I'm thinking....
yeah, and at least they'd be making UEs trying to be aggressive and hit winners as opposed to running out of gas after a 60 shot rally.
Being Easter and all, what would you pick? Sitting through Murray Ferrer or… crucifixion. I'm thinking....
You guys want to go back to aces and 2 shot rallies.
No thanks. I remember those days, they weren't that great as the rackets got too powerful.
You guys want to go back to aces and 2 shot rallies.
No thanks. I remember those days, they weren't that great as the rackets got too powerful.
Not at all, these are the sort of matches we cannot get now, the contrast in styles
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8-MExu-72i0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZbmaEtZeno8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bfd1rLde2OY
Nah, I want to go back to when players hit more winners than errors.
Not at all, these are the sort of matches we cannot get now, the contrast in styles
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8-MExu-72i0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZbmaEtZeno8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bfd1rLde2OY
Not going to happen. I want to see rallies. Speed up the courts slightly, sure, but I enjoy baseline rallies vs ace fests and two shot rallies like the supposed golden days. Otherwise get ready for the John Isner era. Please. No thanks.
Not going to happen. I want to see rallies. Speed up the courts slightly, sure, but I enjoy baseline rallies vs ace fests and two shot rallies like the supposed golden days. Otherwise get ready for the John Isner era. Please. No thanks.
I juat watched Tsonga and Blake from a couple weeks ago. Highly entertaining match. So there are other styles out there. But that Becker Sampras match was ace ace ace 2shot rally, 3 shot rally, ace. Ugh.
And whats with that hangdog look every time the point was over from Sampras? He had great style when hitting but no pizzazz at all, his era was kinda boring if you ask me.
Give me Fed, Nadal, Dkoker, Tsonga etc any day of the week. They can speed up the courts a,little bit but the 80's and pre Fed 90's tennis kinda sucked... to me anyway. Its when I started to lose interest.
I was fortunate to be at Wimbledon last year to watch Tsonga v Fish, a very enjoyable match, real old school stuff, crowd loved it as well.
But I would like to see this kind of match in a final live on television, not on court 2 at Wimbledon. These types of players are not getting to big finals.
I watched until the third set only to see a women's match break out.
Number 2 in the world, really? The whole third set I kept thinking "Why doesn't he come in and shorten the points?" He's 6'3, fast on his feet, and has a long reach. Use all of that to advantage instead of playing like your 5'9 opponent.
A win's a win, but that was uninspiring tennis on Murray's part.
You well know that Isner would not succeed in any era because tennis is a sport of movement and he's too tall to move well, you know this.
Right, that's why Goran Ivansevic won Wimbledon at 32 years old and no movement at all, just ace ace ace boom boom boom. Sounds like John Isner to me. You probably just forgot what it was like. I grew up in that era. Tennis was booooring. Even Sampras was tossing like 25 ace matches out there. Nothing more boring than that.
Goran moved a lot better than isner and was far superior at the net. Also, Goran's return game was better. Guy could hit more than two shots in a row. Isner can't break anyone's serve. All of his matches end up in 5 set tie breaks, even the three set matches!
Federer approached the net more than 50 times in the match as well IIRC.
Right, right. That's why Isner beat Federer at Davis Cup on clay last year, and beat Djokovic at Indian Wells last year. Took Nadal to 5 sets at the French after having a 2-1 lead in sets.
He's also beat Berdych (twice), Tsonga, Monfils, Haas, and Raonic.
Does he have movement issues? Yes. But speed the courts up, and his serve would be absolutely unreturnable, and I think he'd break enough times to be able to win a major at a place like Wimbledon. We'll never know, because the place is so slow now. And that's fine. I Don't LIKE Isner's style, or that style of tennis.
Federer approached the net more than 50 times in the match as well IIRC.
Regardless of the speed, Isner is not good enough to make major finals in any era. I like how you use an extreme example to try to make a point, unfortunately for you because you are using an extreme example, it almost renders your point invalid. No amount of looking at this from an array of angles and the odd upset he creates here and there will change the fact that Isner is not good enough to make major finals so there is no point comparing him to people like Stich, Krajicek and Ivanisevic who were talented players and quite a few inches shorter.
But I'm sure you will keep trying though ;-0
Right, right. That's why Isner beat Federer at Davis Cup on clay last year, and beat Djokovic at Indian Wells last year. Took Nadal to 5 sets at the French after having a 2-1 lead in sets.
He's also beat Berdych (twice), Tsonga, Monfils, Haas, and Raonic.
Does he have movement issues? Yes. But speed the courts up, and his serve would be absolutely unreturnable, and I think he'd break enough times to be able to win a major at a place like Wimbledon. We'll never know, because the place is so slow now. And that's fine. I Don't LIKE Isner's style, or that style of tennis.
Ok, I guess beating the #1 and #2 players in the world the last couple of years is "extreme". As well as beating almost everyone in the top 10.
Also, JohnnyMac and Courier have both said he's talented enough to make it to the finals of majors.
So to say Isner would never make it to a final with the lightning fast courts of the 80's and early 90's seems illogical to me. I think that any tennis expert would be more likely to agree with me than you.
But I guess we'll never know.