Good. It only strengthens my resolve to continue to make threads on TW.
That doesn't mean you're going to be likeable or gain support, just to let you know.
Good. It only strengthens my resolve to continue to make threads on TW.
That doesn't mean you're going to be likeable or gain support, just to let you know.
Alpha Male does not care what other people think of him.
Alpha Male does not care what other people think of him.
Attention seeker doesn't equate to an alpha male.
Are you an Alpha male?
You seem to have a very strong foundation in logic (LOL), care to explain what your background is?
I'm not an attention seeker.
Djokovic's retirement will only impact the Australian Open (although I suspect that reign is about to end anyway).
No. It will not be good. Djokovic has a nice game. not as aggressive as I typically enjoy but still good.
Only Nadal fans will say it will be good if Djokovic retires.
Well, Djokovic's presence had impact on Federer at the US Open and RG and Nadal ummmm ... practically everywhere outside of RG as well.
The only reason Djokovic lost at Roland Garros was his lack of presence, actually. Djokovic was up a break in the 5th set and Nadal walked all over him with 22 winners in the set. And in the Wimbledon final, Murray won the big points and won in straight sets.... And US Open, Murray won that last year with clutchness beyond Djokovic's reach.
Let the people be the judge, you can't convince anyone. Get it ?
You've commited logical fallacy ad populum https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_populum
What are you talking about ???
You self-proclaimed who you are has NO effect on other people judges you.
You can argue that you're not an attention seeker all you want, but that's not going to change one's perspective.
You've stated that I'm an attention seeker and to support your claim you've made the appeal to the masses which is a logical fallacy.
You've stated that I'm an attention seeker and to support your claim you've made the appeal to the masses which is a logical fallacy.
Is that a fact or an opinion?
All I said is let the people to decide.
Once again...attention seeker doesn't equate to alpha male.
The day Novak retires, the day tennis dies.
Judging by his latest signature, I have a feeling he may have regressed a little in that department! :wink:
Fact.
I cannot imagine the tour without him...
You can all say whatever you want but he's the only player who can constantly challenge Nadal on clay. And that's saying a lot.
If so, prove it. If you don't, you will have lost the argument and it will have just been an opinion.
You want proof that appeal to the masses is a logical fallacy?
Yes, I want proof. If you don't provide me with proof, you will lose the argument.
Why doesn't this thread have a poll - Don't you want to know the answer?