HEAD Penn Official

Status
Not open for further replies.

n8dawg6

Legend
I'm really disappointed to know the pictures were removed! Censure is something we should avoid in any field of knowledge.
Head should stop advertising "player's frames" suffixing stuff with "Pro" and return its focus to providing a higher quality product to end user.
Your Graphene series would be a disaster... but you sponsor Djoko and Murray, #1 and #2... If it was Federer and Nadal... Well...

Please, don't take it personally, many years ago, during Guga era, I used to play with Head i.Prestige, even old PT630... And you were supplying nice frames to general public... Today, what are our options from Head?

You offer a custom frame for ridiculous $400 and I have no idea what quality control we should expect!

Once again, for whom it may concern, with all due respect:
Censure is something we should avoid in any field of knowledge

ridic. This is a forum owned by a retailer of tennis equipment. They are under contract with Head. Head's marketing department has a timeline for release of new equipment that they can contractually enforce with the retailers whom they allow to carry their product. They do this because they are, well, a business. I'm sure ya'll have plenty of humorous suggestions about how they should run their business, but at the end of the day they've spent more time on it than you have. Let them have their timeline for cryin out loud.
 

Dgdavid

Professional
Hi Andy, glad you started this thread.
I've liked many Head frames in particular the MG radical MP, ig rad os, I.prestige MP and ig prestige MP but my all time favourite is the Graphene Prestige Rev Pro you play with. Lovely racket, played with a thin poly at 48lbs. Luckily I am not a 'Prestige snob' so don't feel the need to murder people simply because it is very different from the heavier 18x20 mids (which were also very nice but different).

A Rev Pro in a bigger head would be perfect but for whatever reason, the Pro and S aren't that. Do you think it could be achieved with a 98 Custom Made?
 

grip

Rookie
I quite like using the Head ATP balls on clay(I can get 3 singles matches out of a set). I find that they wear better than the Slazenger ones that most people here use. Hey, aren't Head & Penn ball competitors?
 
Head user for about the last four or five years (YT Prestige MP to IG Prestige MP). I feel that the IG Prestige is a very fine frame. Somewhat stiff as in not a noodle but well below mid-stiff. I could see myself playing with these for a long time given the reviews that I've seen of the Graphene.

Unfortunately, I think that stiffer is the trend because that's what more people want. The folks like me that want softer frames is probably a small minority.

Which ball could you recommend that's closest to the US Open Extra Duty ball? I've been using these for many years and haven't found anything better.

Yes everyone has their preferences and we can agree that there is a trend as the game of tennis continues to change.
Have you tried the ProPenn Marathon XD or ATP World Tour XD? Those are our premium balls.
 
Btw, my 16 year daughter plays with mg rad pro. A truly unique frame (from all mfg, not just head) thin beam, firm and good feel, open string pattern. Any idea if this type of frame will be updated?

With the MG Radicals still being manufactured as our Head classic model I don't see them making anything similar at the moment but you can pick these up at a good price right now so I would suggest stocking up!
 

JohnBPittsburgh

Hall of Fame
I also wanted to welcome you Andy, and glad to see Head coming to these boards. I believe there are a lot of tennis fanatics here, that make multiple purchases a year regarding tennis equipment (we aren't the people who buy one racquet at Wal mart :rolleyes:, never restring :confused:, and are under the delusion that you can play with the same can of balls for 10 years :eek:) It is nice to be able to get some information on Head products past, present, and future. Thank you for joining.
 

RalphJ

Banned
Hey Andy, what was Head's thinking behind the Graphene XT Speed Rev Pro? It's an appealing racquet because its the only Speed that's 98".
 
Did Head stiffen up the "Classic" Microgel Radical Mp's that are for sale now, or is that a rumor? I have not bought any of the new ones, due to hearing this. I still have my older one, but was thinking of getting a back up, and heard they stiffened up the frame a little.

These are coming from the same molds and tech.
 

kkm

Hall of Fame
Hello Andy! I really like the CAP grommet system available on the Prestige series and some Radical racquets. I also like the mostly parallel grommets (similar to Babolat, and Wilson's "parallel drilling") on a couple of the new Speed (and Instinct?) series racquets. I have no doubt that at least some of HEAD's so-called marketing "gurus," R&D, and management personnel would instantly shoot this idea down, saying that the "purist" crowd who use Prestige (and some Radical) series racquets with the CAP system will never go for this, but if HEAD would make a racquet or some racquets (I don't care which series it/they would be part of) with CAP grommets and mostly parallel grommets (similar to Babolat, and Wilson's "parallel drilling") I would consider this the ideal racquet and switch to HEAD. One more thing: the string pattern of the current HEAD 16x19 racquets without shared holes leaves quite a bit of space between the top cross and the edge of the frame, same for the bottom. And I think that the shared holes are a step back (fewer/worse options for tying off). So why not, while you're at it, for the 16x19 racquets, make them still with 4 loops in the throat (mains starting at the top and ending at the top, for natural 1-piece stringing), no shared holes, and main skips at 7H & 7T and 9H & 9T? It's the same string pattern the YOUTEK Radical Pro had, and the YOUTEK Radical Pro was a dream from a stringing perspective! Just like the YOUTEK Radical Pro, space the strings so that tying off options are flexible - make sure that 8H is the main string tieoff, and 9H and 9T are possibilities for the crosses.


For a look at the string pattern I'm referring to:

http://img.tennis-warehouse.com/reviews/YoutekProMain.jpg


Thank you Andy!
 
Andy, welcome! Really enjoying the Extreme Pro right now (IG version but like the XT as well). Question - did Head change the grip shape after the IG version? It doesn't feel as flat to me (the XT grip versus the IG grip on the Extreme Pro). The grip on the XT and Graphene feel different than the IG. Doesn't feel like the prestige grip anymore but it also doesn't feel as square as the Speed series. Just curious....thanks and glad Head is on the forum.

I actually have about 6 years of extreme's next to me in the office and all the grips have the same shape.
 
Hi Andy, glad you started this thread.
I've liked many Head frames in particular the MG radical MP, ig rad os, I.prestige MP and ig prestige MP but my all time favourite is the Graphene Prestige Rev Pro you play with. Lovely racket, played with a thin poly at 48lbs. Luckily I am not a 'Prestige snob' so don't feel the need to murder people simply because it is very different from the heavier 18x20 mids (which were also very nice but different).

A Rev Pro in a bigger head would be perfect but for whatever reason, the Pro and S aren't that. Do you think it could be achieved with a 98 Custom Made?

I would suggest playing around with the lead tape on Graphene Prestige Pro if you're looking for the larger head first before committing to the custom mod we offer!
 

sma1001

Hall of Fame
Hi Andy - welcome. Glad to have your knowledge and insights on the site. I've played several Head racquets and have the MG Rad MP on the way. Would be interested to hear your thoughts on the right tension if i'm using a soft poly. Cheers.
 
I quite like using the Head ATP balls on clay(I can get 3 singles matches out of a set). I find that they wear better than the Slazenger ones that most people here use. Hey, aren't Head & Penn ball competitors?

HEAD balls are only used in Europe and possibly Asia. HEAD owns Penn stateside.
 
Why two brands for same balls?
I think people are more familliar with Head brand

The short answer is that HEAD corporate is in Austria and very recognizable throughout Europe in both tennis and skis/snowboards so they use that name on the balls. In the states Penn has been around for over 100 years and very recognized here. In 1999 Penn was purchased by HEAD and we wanted to keep the branding they have established in the states.
 
Hi Andy - welcome. Glad to have your knowledge and insights on the site. I've played several Head racquets and have the MG Rad MP on the way. Would be interested to hear your thoughts on the right tension if i'm using a soft poly. Cheers.

Thank you for the support! There is a lot of school of thoughts on strings and tensions. Nowadays a lot of people are going to lower tensions with the polys (I myself have even dropped down the lbs). I would start out around 57lbs and then see if you still get good control on your shots. There are a lot of variables that go into this though and personal preferences.

When I was playing in college I always used the top of the tension range but now I go 3-4 lower than the top.
 

smirker

Hall of Fame
Hi Andy - welcome. Glad to have your knowledge and insights on the site. I've played several Head racquets and have the MG Rad MP on the way. Would be interested to hear your thoughts on the right tension if i'm using a soft poly. Cheers.

I string my LM Rad mp at 21kgs for mains and 20 for crosses. Its a tight 18x20 so control is still good. Also the spinniest frame I own which is odd but it just is. Also use a thin guage 1.19 string.
 
Hi Andy, welcome to the the boards! I'm a long time Head racquet user and aficionado having spent much time with Pro Tour 280, i Prestige,Ti Rad and Classic MP over the last 20 years. I'll admit I'm now a Graphene Prestige MP convert (one of those!). There are days where I do "fantasize" of a 16x19 version of the Pro Tour 280 but I must admit the G Prestige is working for me in providing extra punch and crispness yet retaining control and stability aspects that I liked from my previous Head frames. I also appreciate that the traditional Prestige MP racquet mold and grip shape has stuck around. My only beef is that I have 2 frames with same grip and strings but one is 8-9 grams heavier than the other...the heavier one makes for a really solid stick but it's unfortunate that there is such a discrepancy between the 2. Probably doesn't mean a thing but on the lighter racquet the graphene honeycomb decal in the inside throat is white-ish while it is black like the rest of the throat on the heavier racquet. Both came in Head white plastic bags directly from the rep to the vendor. Lastly and on another note, I've now officially made the switch to Pro Penn Marathon Xtra Duty balls - the best in the business in my opinion. Keep up the good work,
 

Zoolander

Hall of Fame
I actually have about 6 years of extreme's next to me in the office and all the grips have the same shape.

Gotta give Head a wrap, never been a big Head fan (too many 18*20 patterns) but i have used the Extremes since the first microgels and they are great racquets. Kudos to whoever took a punt on the rounder headshape but i think it works. I have my doubts about the headsize though, i'm sure its probably closer to 105 than 100?
 

Roland G

Hall of Fame
Hi Andy,

Can I ask about the Extreme, Speed and Instinct MP frames? What style and level of player are each of these lines aimed at and what are the differences in each?

Thanks in advance.
 

Sander001

Hall of Fame
The short answer is that HEAD corporate is in Austria and very recognizable throughout Europe in both tennis and skis/snowboards so they use that name on the balls. In the states Penn has been around for over 100 years and very recognized here. In 1999 Penn was purchased by HEAD and we wanted to keep the branding they have established in the states.
Ugh please tell the ball people to use more numbers in labelling. Often heard on the courts "We're using Penn 3."
"We're using Penn 3 too!!"
And that usually escalates into a brawl.
 

Irvin

Talk Tennis Guru
Ugh please tell the ball people to use more numbers in labelling. Often heard on the courts "We're using Penn 3."
"We're using Penn 3 too!!"
And that usually escalates into a brawl.
Very simple solution, carry a Sharpie in your bag and put marks on your balls so you always know which ones are yours. Carry over from the golf course.

EDIT: You could use ProPenns too no one I know wants to spend any more than they have to spend. LOL
 
Ugh please tell the ball people to use more numbers in labelling. Often heard on the courts "We're using Penn 3."
"We're using Penn 3 too!!"
And that usually escalates into a brawl.
The reason behind this is when they are manufactured they had 4 vats in the factory that are numbered 1,2,3,4. So when the balls pop out they are numbered with which number vat they came out of.
 
Last edited:
Very simple solution, carry a Sharpie in your bag and put marks on your balls so you always know which ones are yours. Carry over from the golf course.

EDIT: You could use ProPenns too no one I know wants to spend any more than they have to spend. LOL


Very true! In high school I was in charge of putting black dots on all our tennis balls to show they were different from the girls teams.
 
Hi Andy,

Can I ask about the Extreme, Speed and Instinct MP frames? What style and level of player are each of these lines aimed at and what are the differences in each?

Thanks in advance.

Speed-Fast powerful game, aggressive player.
Instinct-Effortless power, maneuverability, baseliner mostly.
Extreme-Easy Spin, play from behind the baseline.

Any level of player can really use these racquets as they all have the 100 sq in head size. We do offer them in the Rev Pro/S (light for the extreme) if someone wants a lighter version.

Thank you for the question!
 
Hi Andy, welcome to the the boards! I'm a long time Head racquet user and aficionado having spent much time with Pro Tour 280, i Prestige,Ti Rad and Classic MP over the last 20 years. I'll admit I'm now a Graphene Prestige MP convert (one of those!). There are days where I do "fantasize" of a 16x19 version of the Pro Tour 280 but I must admit the G Prestige is working for me in providing extra punch and crispness yet retaining control and stability aspects that I liked from my previous Head frames. I also appreciate that the traditional Prestige MP racquet mold and grip shape has stuck around. My only beef is that I have 2 frames with same grip and strings but one is 8-9 grams heavier than the other...the heavier one makes for a really solid stick but it's unfortunate that there is such a discrepancy between the 2. Probably doesn't mean a thing but on the lighter racquet the graphene honeycomb decal in the inside throat is white-ish while it is black like the rest of the throat on the heavier racquet. Both came in Head white plastic bags directly from the rep to the vendor. Lastly and on another note, I've now officially made the switch to Pro Penn Marathon Xtra Duty balls - the best in the business in my opinion. Keep up the good work,

Thank you for the support on both HEAD and Penn!
If you want I can take a look at those frames if you wanted to shoot some pictures my way I would be happy to evaluate them.
headpennofficial@us.head.com
 

movdqa

Talk Tennis Guru

Thanks. I booked marked both pages and will go through the reviews. It seems that Penn may have had some QC issues back in 2012 and 2013 but I didn't see complaints after this.

I may try a case of these to compare with the US Opens [still have 1/3rd case left].
 

movdqa

Talk Tennis Guru
I'd just get a case from TW. My local stores aren't very good at carrying premium balls. They sometimes carry US Opens but are often out for weeks at a time. It's easier to just get a case and I'll live with it if unhappy.
 
Just added a poll to the thread on the top of the page. "What is your favorite HEAD player on tour?" Feel free to cast your vote and discuss. Let's try to keep it to HEAD players for this one!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top