Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by CocaCola, Jun 23, 2009.
Most of the reasons there are pretty silly IMO. Reasons #2 and #1 are accurate though, but who knows.
Reason # 8 is valid too...
That's one way to look at it. The other is this trophy will give him the confidence he needs and knowing he can play well on grass.
True article. Cant argue with that. The only thing you can compare is their last GRAND SLAM meeting (forget the rest, they are unimportant in Grand Slam comparison).
Reason #3. Murray is a choker. We all remember his last GS final.
Reason #11. Murray is ugly.
Seriously, he ran his mouth too much already to even have a chance against Roger.
Djokovic was the same at the US Open
but he went on to win the Australian Open.
Please don't bash or insult players, you can express your opinion perfectly without it.
I would like Federer to win, but seriously, how stupid and silly can the tabloids get ?! That excuse for an article was 5 minutes of my life I will never get back.
Reasons 1, 4, 9 & 10 nailed it.
reason 14: he'll lose to roddick in the semi's
Separate names with a comma.