Discussion in 'Pro Match Results and Discussion' started by Ico, Nov 8, 2012.
The blockbuster match in Group B.
The big question: will Fed tank because he's already qualified?
Going for Fed in 2 just because he switches it on at times like these.
Del Potro in three. Vamos!
Federer doesn't tank.
Federer wins in 2 or 3 if he plays like he did versus Tipsy, loses in 3 if he plays like he did versus Ferrer.
So basically Del Potro has to win this match in straight sets to qualify otherwise it`s most likely Federer and Ferrer that go through.It sux on Ferrer if he wins 2 matches and doesn`t go through but that is a possibility.
As far as I'm concerned, this is where Fed's tournament starts. This is the first match Fed will play someone who can actually possibly offer some kind of resistance. And oh the irony, the match doesn't even count (for Fed)...
tough to callbut since fed doesn't need it, delpo in 3
Maybe Fed should tank. His semifinal opponent will have an extra day of rest over him.
It not like Federer gonna give up. He will play as hard as if there was something on the line.
Fed earned that, isnt it ?
JMDP in 2 , maybe 3...
Just like Federer in last 3 years
I'm saying Federer in 3. Delpo will take a set, but there are 200 ranking points on the line as well, so I don't see Fed tanking. Moreover he'll try his hardest just so Delpo won't possibly have some kind of mental edge over him.
This can't become the face of tennis
If (big if) Federer indeed decides to throw away the match, Del Potro is almost sure to qualify isn't he?
Assuming he wins in 2 and Ferrer wins in 2 as well. You'd have Delpo(5/2), Federer(4/2) and Ferrer (4/3).
Doesn't seem fair to Ferrer, let's hope Federer goes for the win.
oh no its a bit scary
like in 'the invasion of the body snatchers'...after the people have been 'duplicated' they sense someone who hasnt been converted and they point and emit a hideous shriek:evil:
Is it you, LOLville
This can't become the face of tennis.
I think champions tame their spirits to a degree as they ascend stardom and become aware of their responsibilities.
This was pure poetry.
Awaiting jj to turn up, but fancy delPo in 3.
Roger Federer in two sets..
I don't want a three setter. I would rather have Roger play two sets and save energy for sunday semifinal
It will be damn funny if 2 players from the "group of cake" make the final. Unlikely, I know, but it will be funny if it happens.
DelPotro in 2/3. Fed's got no sting in his groundstrokes and to make things worse is short on confidence as his FS% indicates.
Are you sure, what happened in the 2010 and 2011 USO semi finals?
So is it a Monday final, as peeps were saying. 3 days in a row for the old man ???:shock:
It doesn't matter, he is gonna win three in a row. I have faith
I don't know what you talking about
Fed in 3 tough sets
Fed is gonna tank. Delpo in 2. That way Fed doesn't get tired, keeps his energy for the tough ones, avoids Murray in semi, sends Delpo to semi who will be a tougher opponent for Murray than Ferrer. It's all good for Fed except in terms of ranking points but that should come second to increasing his chances to win the event.
Nope, Fed is not going to tank. I just posted this video to you in the "It is in Djoke's hands" thread. It is a short clip of Fed saying he wants to beat Del Potro after his loss to him in Basel. He does not want to lose twice in a row to him. Here is the clip:
Federer in two.
I disagree but I will cheer for Fed for once because I want the semis to be Murray/Fed, Djoko/whoever, so that there is more chance to have another Murray/Djoko thriller in the final. Go Fed!!!
lolz @ Murray/Djoko thriller, it's a boring match..
Llodra - Isner Paris match in last week was a real thriller! 10000000 times better than Murray/Djoko matches
Well to each their own as they say. But Llodra is not playing and Isner is annoying with his serve, serve, serve, rinse and repeat style of play. Wasn't it at the USO though that Isner/Llodra played a thriller? (oh no sorry, it was Isner/Kohl, great match) I enjoyed that one. (also to me Djoko and Murray are the 2 best on hard currently).
So if fedgod tanks tomorrow who will he face in the semis, if it is not murray he can silently tank ,makes the path to the final easier.
If the miracle of the millenium happened and Tsonga qualified, Fed would NOT want to tank. He would want to crush Delpo and would be laughing all night at the idea of playing Tsonga in the semi, which would basically mean a free pass to the final.
Exactly, but with the crappy serve performances, he cant do this at all! Cant get any free points!
Are they playing the final on Monday?
Federer would not tank regardless. He never does. He said it clearly - "there is no substitution to the confidence a win gives you".
Fed has done it before at WTF to eliminate Murray. He can do it again, bet on it.
First time I hear it. What year was that?
Here you go. Fed being a snake. Strategic tanking should never be encouraged in tennis. One more argument to not take WTF completely seriously as a tournament.
Are you suggesting that Federer lost the first set 2-6 instead of 3-6 to the USO champion and eventual WTF finalist because he "tanked", that he calculated the WTF math up to the game precision during the match and had absolute control over the score of a set, as if he was playing his puppet?
You cannot be serious.
I know the article chose irony. I only quoted it to point to the incident itself. I have absolutely no doubt that Fed tanked that match.
Bleacherreport... That's one thing, for starters.
But seriously, veroniquem, you really punched yourself in the face with posting that specific article. Here's a couple of comments from that page; careful, the second one is from the writer:
I guess that's ironic.
Separate names with a comma.