4 Radical Users: LM Radical MP vis-a-vis MG Radical MP? Summary of differences?

Discussion in 'Racquets' started by msmullin, Jul 28, 2011.

  1. msmullin

    msmullin New User

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2011
    Messages:
    93
    How would you summarize the differences between the Liquidmetal Radical MP and the MicroGel Radical MP? I can read the differences in specs, but I was hoping to get some insight into differences in feel and playability. What shots are harder/easier with each, etc?

    Thanks a bunch!

    msmullin
    ---------------
    Trying to pick a new racket.
     
    #1
  2. 86golf

    86golf Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2009
    Messages:
    607
    Location:
    Carolinas
    I think the difference is about $20. Seriously though, I can switch back and forth between them in a game and not see any major differences. LM is a bit more head heavy and a touch stiffer. Both well worth the 69 and 89 dollars respectively. Just buy one of each.
     
    #2
  3. RyKnocks

    RyKnocks Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2011
    Messages:
    437
    I have to disagree a bit with 86golf. I'm new to tennis but I've played table tennis for years so I know how to look for differences in equipment.

    I'd say the LM Radical is more than just a "touch" stiffer, it's noticeably stiffer. That's not to say that it isn't comfortable to hit with, but compared to the MG version, the MG is just a better and more solid racquet all around. It's well worth the extra money you pay for it, which isn't much.

    I demo'd the LM Radical and was pretty much set on buying it. I was lucky enough to find the MG Radical on an auction site for cheap (the seller didn't mark it as an MG so it didn't get much attention but the picture clearly showed it was an MG). People on these boards had talked about how soft and plush the feel was, and I was a bit skeptical because I demo'd a Dunlop Aerogel 800 which is supposed to have a soft feel as well and I hated it. When I took the MG out onto the court and hit with it for the first time, I couldn't have been happier. Same great control as the LM Rad, but more solid/soft/plush/comfortable feel overall.

    It's also more solid with off-center shots. When I hit off center with the LM Rad, you knew because the ball would go into some crazy direction and there was a lot of feedback from the racquet. This was a bit off putting to me at first because it showed my true noob-ness, but I had decided to stick with it because I figured it would force me to hit the sweet spot every time. With the MG, off center shots are more solid and stay in the general direction that you're hitting towards, and you don't get as much of that warping feedback that you would with the LM.

    Overall, if you have $20 extra, put it towards getting the MG. The ONLY thing I despise about the MG is the horrid paint job LOL. Hope that helps.
     
    #3
  4. RyKnocks

    RyKnocks Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2011
    Messages:
    437
    Also, buy a pack of lead tape. The great thing about these radicals is that they're easily customizable to fit your needs. It really helps to open up the racquets sweet spot and add a little more swing weight and plow through.
     
    #4
  5. flashfire276

    flashfire276 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2009
    Messages:
    1,900
    +1!
    Looks like you did take my suggestions. You went for the MG Radical MP?
     
    #5
  6. msmullin

    msmullin New User

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2011
    Messages:
    93
    What about serving?

    How is the MG on serve? Is it better than LM?
     
    #6
  7. steve728

    steve728 Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2009
    Messages:
    218
    Location:
    D.C.
    +1. And the slice backhand? That's one shot that's inconsistent for me (i.e., floaters) with the YT radical. So wondering how the MG and LM compare in the serve and slice departments.
     
    #7
  8. FedExpress 333

    FedExpress 333 Professional

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2011
    Messages:
    1,182
    Location:
    New York
    I love the MG for slices, it feels like the ball is sinking into the stringbed and lets you realllllllly carve the ball.
     
    #8
  9. dgoran

    dgoran Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2004
    Messages:
    1,891
    I have to disagree with both RyKnock and 86golf and offer you a third perspective.

    The only thing we all agree is DEFINITELY BUY A PACK OF LEAD TAPE. but IMHO LM radical is a better player by a country mile. I have lots of HEAD rackets and they are my favorite i have or had PT630, LM Radical, MG Radical(sold) YT Radical Prestige Mid MP etc...

    LM Radical is a great player in stock form that turns beastly with lead tape added while MG radical is DEAD on arrival and no amounts of lead tape helped drastically like it did on LM.

    LM simply turns into a beast if you place lead all around the hoop simulating CAP system.

    Stiffness make it tad more powerful but control oriented players stick like stiffer version of pt630
     
    #9
  10. got spin?

    got spin? Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2011
    Messages:
    469
    Location:
    Dish Pit
    The LM is a little Head Lighter than the MG. But other than that, the only difference is the MG looks cooler :)
     
    #10
  11. msmullin

    msmullin New User

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2011
    Messages:
    93
    I'm only about a 3.5 right now and probably won't get past a 4.0. (40 years old, returning to the game.) Does that matter in your evaluation?
     
    #11
  12. dgoran

    dgoran Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2004
    Messages:
    1,891
    Well there are definitely easier rackets to play with at 3, 3.5 level than 98 that is really 95 sq inch head but like I said if you are stuck between those two, lm radical is easier to use stock since its stiffer and has more power and if you get better you can add lead tape when you learn what specs you like and what would you like to improve but again stock lm radical its much easier to play with than mg hands down.

    If you have to choose between those two and you have sensitive arm than I would suggest mg over lm radical due to stiffness and if you miss sweet spot a lot liquid metal will be read bit more jarring...
     
    #12
  13. OldButGame

    OldButGame Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2010
    Messages:
    1,579
    Location:
    To the Court,At The Court, Going home from The Cou
    Here they are for me,..side to side,..

    Power- LM>MG
    Control-MG>LM
    Serve-LM>MG
    Stability-LM>MG
    Touch-MG>LM
    Returns-LM>MG
    Comfort-MG>LM
    Volleys-LM>MG

    Both excellent sticks in their own rights,...I'd buy both if You're able,..
     
    #13
  14. Doubles

    Doubles Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 4, 2010
    Messages:
    4,280
    Location:
    Approaching the net
    I've got to disagree dgoran, the MG is far superior to the LM Radical, in my opinion. It just does everything better...
     
    #14
  15. BobFL

    BobFL Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2007
    Messages:
    3,692
    Location:
    Orlando
    It cannot be any clearer than this: lm>>>mg. It is not even close. LM is overwhelmingly superior frame. MG is very unique in the sense that it almost showed zero sensitivity to lead. It just stayed completely dead and anemic.
     
    #15
  16. Doubles

    Doubles Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 4, 2010
    Messages:
    4,280
    Location:
    Approaching the net
    Again, I have to disagree. To me, the MG flexed in all of the right places and just has great feel for a doubles player like myself. The only change that I made to it was a leather grip...
     
    #16
  17. BobFL

    BobFL Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2007
    Messages:
    3,692
    Location:
    Orlando
    Doubles, you don't have to disagree every time you see discrepancy with your own opinion. Once is more than enough :) I personally don't post to agree/disagree but to answer OPs question and/or share my view.
     
    #17
  18. Doubles

    Doubles Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 4, 2010
    Messages:
    4,280
    Location:
    Approaching the net
    Okay, next time I'll make sure to do things your way because they're clearly right:) Forgive me for wanting to point out what I liked about my racket, compared to the LM version...
     
    #18
  19. NLBwell

    NLBwell Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2004
    Messages:
    7,083
    The MG will feel more comfortable, damped (or, if you don't like it - mushy). The LM will feel more crisp, give more feedback (or, if you dont like it - harsh). I used to play with Head rackets until they put in intellifibers, liquid metal, and drilled holes in perfectly good rackets (flexpoint). With the microgel, Head actually had a good feeling racket instead of a harsh racket, so I went back to Head.
     
    #19
  20. BobFL

    BobFL Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2007
    Messages:
    3,692
    Location:
    Orlando
    Hahahha, it is not my way :) You just said "again, ...." and that's why I said what I said. Nothing sinister :)
     
    #20
  21. msmullin

    msmullin New User

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2011
    Messages:
    93
    I've mostly played with Wilsons plus a dampener, so sounds like the MicgroGel might be a better option for me. Would you agree with that NLBwell?
     
    #21
  22. Doubles

    Doubles Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 4, 2010
    Messages:
    4,280
    Location:
    Approaching the net
    It's all good:) But getting back to the racket, I just felt that the LM was stiff, tinny, and hollow. The MG, however, was soft and more forgiving. That said, racket selection is really subjective...
     
    #22
  23. NLBwell

    NLBwell Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2004
    Messages:
    7,083
    I haven't played with a Wilson for a long tme, so I don't know.
     
    #23
  24. hrstrat57

    hrstrat57 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2007
    Messages:
    1,694
    Location:
    RI
    Buy both, TW prices are excellent at the moment.

    Sell the one you like least on c list, the big auction site or here on the forums and buy a 2nd frame of the one you like better.

    Easy peezy lemon squeezy!
     
    #24
  25. msmullin

    msmullin New User

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2011
    Messages:
    93
    Thanks everyone!
     
    #25
  26. goblinboblin

    goblinboblin New User

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2011
    Messages:
    1
    Just wanted to put my 2 cents in here before we're done....I prefer the flexpoints over both the LM and MG :)
     
    #26
  27. TimothyO

    TimothyO Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2010
    Messages:
    3,592
    Location:
    Baseline
    How did you have the MG strung?

    Just ordered the MG Radical OS. Larger head but I'm still curious.
     
    #27

Share This Page