a comparison...can you take it?

Discussion in 'Racquets' started by califsurferboy33, May 6, 2007.

  1. califsurferboy33

    califsurferboy33 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2007
    Messages:
    645
    please compare the wilson nsixone tour (90) racket with the Babolat Pure Drive Team Standard racket (100). Thanks. Please use the following categories.

    Swingweight:
    Spin:
    Power:
    Serving:
    Kick on serve:
    Control:
    Slice:
    2 handed backhand:
    Stiffness:

    and anything else you can think of. Thanks.

    bk
     
    #1
  2. BreakPoint

    BreakPoint Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    46,676
    The Wilson nSix-One Tour and the Babolat Pure Drive cannot be compared. It is against the law. ;)

    Sorry. :-(
     
    #2
  3. Voltron

    Voltron Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2006
    Messages:
    3,904
    Location:
    Pffft, like I'd know
    *Kicks down door* Put your hands on your head, comparing those racquets is a felony! ;)
     
    #3
  4. [K]aotic

    [K]aotic Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2007
    Messages:
    671
    y don't we compare an apple and an orange where we're at it?
     
    #4
  5. Noveson

    Noveson Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2006
    Messages:
    3,782
    Location:
    PDX
    Hahaha, this is coming from a guy with both of them! If they are so different how can you play with both? Maybe by chance you have both because they are two of the most popular overhyped racquets? Just a guess;)
     
    #5
  6. [K]aotic

    [K]aotic Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2007
    Messages:
    671
    i don't play with the pd... its just in my bag for show :D originally i played with the pd and thought it was really great but then i demoed the k factors and thot it was even better even though it was way more demanding... and the woofer just had a really mushy feel compared to the k factor so i ditched the pd and went for the k90. never really thought about selling the pd..
     
    #6
  7. [K]aotic

    [K]aotic Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2007
    Messages:
    671
    sry for the double post, but silly me!!! i just compared both of em.
     
    #7
  8. anirut

    anirut Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2005
    Messages:
    5,130
    Location:
    Krungthep (Bangkok), Siam (Thailand)
    Comparing these two rackets could result in serious physical and mental injuries, lawsuits and imprisonment.
     
    #8
  9. Thomas Bird-Itch

    Thomas Bird-Itch Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2007
    Messages:
    400
    Use a PD if you wanna be able to hit outright winners and aces. Use the Tour 90 if you care more about keeping the ball in the court when attempting it. ;)
     
    #9
  10. [K]aotic

    [K]aotic Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2007
    Messages:
    671
    maybe its cuz ur not good enough to hit winners with it ;)

    jk :D
     
    #10
  11. Northpaw

    Northpaw New User

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    46
    I haven't played with the K(90), but I have played with (many) K Factors. Overall, I definitely enjoyed the K Factor raquets more. This is, of course, very objective, and I don't feel much like giving a proper review. The best thing to do in any case is to go out there and demo them both if possible.
     
    #11
  12. Swissv2

    Swissv2 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2005
    Messages:
    2,491
    Location:
    Tennis Courts!
    There is actually a comparison between both.

    Completely Opposit.

    if you want product specs, just check TW website.
     
    #12
  13. armand

    armand Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2005
    Messages:
    3,746
    Location:
    RDS001 90: SPPP 1.18 @ 63/61
    Thanks to Babolat BS and their retarded woofy system, the clowns at the pro shop insist on stringing the demos at 55lbs or something. A completely useless tension with a racquet so large.

    But, if we wanna make the comparison anyway, here's the jist:
    PD
    Power: 1,006
    Control: -18(yes, we need to get into negative numbers here)

    nCode
    Power: controllable
    Control: whateva
     
    #13
  14. BreakPoint

    BreakPoint Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    46,676
    Ha ha ha ha! LMAO!

    Thats very funny, anirut! :lol:
     
    #14
  15. phucng_10

    phucng_10 Professional

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2007
    Messages:
    923
    Location:
    San Jose, CA
    Well I've never played with the Wilson Tour 90 but I have a 6.1 95 myself, so I'll try give some specs. The stiffness between the Babolat and the 6.1 95 is a huge differ. My slice serve was great with the Babolat but then when I switched to the 6.1 95 my slice serves were way off the service box. Control is similar but I rather play with the PD more then my 6.1 95. Topspins are great as well as 2hand backhand. You just have to know the right form to show the true power of a 2h backhand with a PD. ;)
     
    #15
  16. Noveson

    Noveson Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2006
    Messages:
    3,782
    Location:
    PDX
    I'm sick of all the (K)ontrol freaks....Armand from all reports the PD has GREAT directional control, as most stiff racquets do. As far as depth control, this shouldn't be too hard, if you don't hit with enough spin, then it isn't for you. I begin to wonder whether you have tried the PD, most likely you have just listened to all the racquet purists on this board, and adopted their opinions as your own.
     
    #16
  17. Thomas Bird-Itch

    Thomas Bird-Itch Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2007
    Messages:
    400
    Just a joke. I could hit winners off of either side, with either racquet, but I use something cheaper to do it with. Babolat is loosely translated from French as "expensive tweener" I believe. Wilson in ye old english is "marketing fraud." Dunlop, what I use is something like "yer broke." :)
     
    #17
  18. armand

    armand Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2005
    Messages:
    3,746
    Location:
    RDS001 90: SPPP 1.18 @ 63/61
    No, I did demo it. But it was strung way too loose. I'm not a crazy topspin player and so I like to have a tighter stringbed. Usually midrange is ok, but thanks to the woof-woof system, Babolat puts a different tension range on the racquet which made it around 55lbs which coulda been used as a trampoline for a small primate such as a howler monkey or ringtailed lemur.
    Now if it was strung to the 'real' midrange, (I guess 60+) then it would be a different story. But Babolat lives by the woof system and I guess it dies by it as well.

    I actually did try the PD Roddick since, and that was strung more reasonably with Hurricane and what seemed to be a higher tension. But I only hit with it for 5 min in heavy winds.
     
    #18

Share This Page