A Decent US Open for Andy Roddick

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by tvp900, Aug 5, 2009.

  1. tvp900

    tvp900 Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2008
    Messages:
    217
    Roddick proved he has what it takes to win slams (if he could get rid of the Swiss Flu he's had for the last few years). I think a successful US Open for him would be at least a semifinal appearence. I'd like to see him win it, but he's going to have a hard time doing it. What does everyone else think.
     
    #1
  2. Swiss flu:) good one, hard to get rid off, i see Roddick going into the semis...
     
    #2
  3. drwood

    drwood Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2009
    Messages:
    1,512
    I expect Roddick to win the title.
     
    #3
  4. You do? For real?
     
    #4
  5. Sartorius

    Sartorius Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2009
    Messages:
    1,471
    I'm not particularly a fan of his current baseline game unlike some maybe, I guess he did "improve" it comparing to last few years, but I prefer the way he played earlier, when he was trying to be really agressive. IIRC he actually said something along those lines in an interview recently; he thinks his current form isn't exactly better than his 2003, 2004 form.

    So he can still struggle quite a bit against a good baseliner, he needs to serve really well. But if he does serve well and play steady from the baseline, like he did at Wimbledon, he can go deep again.
     
    #5
  6. drwood

    drwood Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2009
    Messages:
    1,512
    Yes. He's the only top player other than Federer who has gotten steadily better since the start of the year. He's proven that he's good on grass, but HC is his best surface.

    Fed is still the favorite [5-time defending US Open champ as great as any of his achievements and the one (along with his 21 straight GS SF or better) least likely to be eclipsed], but I expect Roddick with the way he's playing now on HC to beat Murray or Nadal and have a good shot against Fed.

    I don't think anyone other than Fed, Nadal, Murray or Roddick has a realistic shot of winning the US Open.
     
    #6
  7. grafrules

    grafrules Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2007
    Messages:
    2,180
    I think a semifinal would be a good result. Anything more would be a bonus.
     
    #7
  8. That is some good points, agree with most of it, but Roddicks best surface would definetely be grass, the atp-tour is loaded with hc-tournaments so therefore he wins most of his titles there..but i really think he plays the most effective tennis on grass.
    I dont see Roddick pressuring Fed to 5 hard sets on HC...sure i could be wrong but i dont think so.
     
    #8
  9. Roddick will get to the final and lose to Gulbis.
     
    #9
  10. tennisfan25

    tennisfan25 New User

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2009
    Messages:
    16
    I agree with you here although Novak could pull it together, and I'd love to see a deep run by Safin.
     
    #10
  11. If that happens i will fly to New York and run through Central Park naked while screaming "rule britannia"
     
    #11

  12. Sounds good. I will be there. :)
     
    #12
  13. Nowadays Safin only make deep runs into women and bottles...
     
    #13
  14. tennisfan25

    tennisfan25 New User

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2009
    Messages:
    16
    thus hes one of my favorite players
     
    #14
  15. Youd better be:)
     
    #15
  16. NamRanger

    NamRanger G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2005
    Messages:
    13,916


    HCs give Roddick better traction and even the movement area out a little bit, and allow Roddick to get a better look at Federer's serve. As good as Federer is at returning, Roddick showed that if he's on with it Federer can do nothing but hope to get the ball back into play on HCs.



    I'd actually say Roddick has a better chance at the USO where he has the crowd factor, better traction (which means he can unload easier on his forehand), and can get a better look at Federer's serve.
     
    Last edited: Aug 5, 2009
    #16
  17. Commando Tennis Shorts

    Commando Tennis Shorts Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2007
    Messages:
    1,708
    It's not out of the question. He's definitely one of the favorites and with the recent improvements he's made to his game and his conditioning, along with his newfound confidence, Roddick probably believes this is his best shot to take another U.S. Open title.

    As a Roddick fan, I'm actually hoping he faces off against Federer at Flushing Meadows. If Federer/Roddick at Wimbledon was any indication, I'd love to see a rematch.
     
    #17
  18. tangerine

    tangerine Professional

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2005
    Messages:
    1,194
    Strange how people have forgotten that Roddick was in the USO final in 2006.
     
    #18
  19. flyinghippos101

    flyinghippos101 Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2009
    Messages:
    5,312
    I see Roddick advancing to the semis, maybe the finals if he prays.
     
    #19
  20. Toxicmilk

    Toxicmilk Professional

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2008
    Messages:
    916
    Lose in final to Donald Young. :twisted:
    then from that moment forward the notorious wildcard side show will become THE show =D
     
    #20
  21. egn

    egn Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2008
    Messages:
    4,973
    close..

    correct. =] (beat me to it)
     
    #21
  22. bluetrain4

    bluetrain4 Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2007
    Messages:
    8,846
    I've always thought that Roddick is basically capable of anything in a non-clay Slam. He's capable of a humiliating early loss, or a dramatic close loss to a good, but not great player, a beat down by a great player, or he can play great against a great player and lose, and I even thought that he could, possibly win.

    I still think all these options are possible, even after Wimbledon. But, he should come in with a ton of confidence ,and he likes the USO, so I'm predicting good things. Would love to see him win it, but not counting on it.
     
    #22
  23. dragonfire

    dragonfire Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2009
    Messages:
    401
    hopefully, Roddick will win the whole thing.

    Lets not forget that roddick returns a lot better on hardcourt, and that really is his only weakness, which, I don't think will ever improve. Hard courts still promote his power game.
     
    #23
  24. backhand winner

    backhand winner Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2009
    Messages:
    295
    Roddick's overall game might be better on hardcourts but Fed returns Roddick's serve much better on hardcourts. Roddick would probably have trouble breaking Fed on any surface.
     
    #24
  25. dragonfire

    dragonfire Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2009
    Messages:
    401
    well, seeing as he broke federer more times than fed broke andy, i would say your wrong, but that might just be because roddick actually took his chances out there. No offence
     
    #25
  26. DarthMaul

    DarthMaul Professional

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2006
    Messages:
    1,306
    Location:
    Asuras
    Federer beating A-Rod again would be scary... Roddick would kill him, literally!
    LOL
     
    #26
  27. Bertie B

    Bertie B Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2006
    Messages:
    594
    Location:
    Kursk
    Roddick was too tenative at wimbledon for my liking. Had he lost the final going for his shots (a la 2005), I'd like his chances, but he didn't. Also, while impressive, his matches against Hewitt, and Murray went on longer than they should have.

    In other news, the oracle says the Juan Carlos Ferrero is due a confidence and energy boost any day now...watch him.
     
    #27
  28. backhand winner

    backhand winner Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2009
    Messages:
    295
    I am saying that Roddick breaking 2 games in a match that went to 16-14 in the 5th set is not that impressive. Roddick relied on his serve to take it as far as he did. Take some of that sting from his serve away and Fed would break much more. Australian Open 2007 showed an example of that. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ikx0Du735Y
     
    #28
  29. dragonfire

    dragonfire Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2009
    Messages:
    401
    federer was playing his best tennis ever, he would have beaten anyone else in straight sets, the guy was just 'feeling it' and hitting winners everywhere. federer only broke roddick once in that match, and is less impressive.

    Taking the sting out of roddick's serve is like taking the accuracy of federer's serve, they both need it for different reasons. Federer because he hasn't got the power of roddick and roddick because he hasn't the accuracy of federer.

    every player relies on one weapon or aspect in there game to take them far, its true, federer relies on his serve as much as federer.
     
    #29
  30. backhand winner

    backhand winner Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2009
    Messages:
    295
    My whole point is that the hard courts aren't as difficult for Fed to return Roddick's serve as grass. But it doesn't matter what surface Roddick returns on as Fed will likely hold his serve at a very high rate.
     
    #30
  31. dragonfire

    dragonfire Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2009
    Messages:
    401
    i thought that the US open was the fastest slam, im not sure, is it??? If so, it would help his serve even more, but wouldn't help his return.

    Federer's serve is good, but if he has a terible service game, or match for that matter, he is veunrable, nadal proved that in AO 09 and i know nadal is a much better player than roddick, but still. If federer had an off day on serve, then he could do damage. Roddick could go for return winners too.

    it's not just federer's serve that roddick struggles with, he's blessed with a crap return unfortunately. Nothing he can do about it now. He could perhaps stand far back like monfils does
     
    #31
  32. tintin

    tintin Professional

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2007
    Messages:
    1,438
    Location:
    none of your damn business
    would be nice if Roddick lost in the First round
     
    #32
  33. dragonfire

    dragonfire Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2009
    Messages:
    401
    why would it be nice, are you a murray fan that just wants revenge??
     
    #33
  34. jonnythan

    jonnythan Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2009
    Messages:
    1,356
    Roddick tore it up at Wimbledon and almost, almost, almost took down Federer. There's a lot more in his favor at the US Open, so he can make a deep run.
     
    #34
  35. Cfidave

    Cfidave Professional

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2004
    Messages:
    1,190
    Location:
    Elmira,NY
    What? He has done it 19 times! If they meet at the US Open, it will be 20. Roddicks best chance against Fed has come & gone. I agree, that hard courts gives Fed a better look at Roddicks serve.
     
    #35
  36. It really does, the bounce will always be the same, that is not the case at Wimbledon, i dont see Roddick (although i think he is a hell of a player and a HoF) ever being as close to beating Fed as he was in Wimbledon...i mean 4!! setpoints going 2-0 sets up...Fed would probably not have risen after that...
     
    #36

Share This Page