A few random questions!

Discussion in 'Stringing Techniques / Stringing Machines' started by sansaephanh, Dec 15, 2012.

  1. sansaephanh

    sansaephanh Professional

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2009
    Messages:
    1,166
    Location:
    Oakland
    Can someone explain the S hook technique? Sounds like a masterful idea to cure my lack of prince boomerangs. I can't seem to find the youtube vid.

    How the heck do you guys get the strings so straight? Multis, monos, synthetic guts all look wobbly and unprofessional when i'm finished. Even some polys.

    Any tips on stringing dense string patterns? When i try to do a quality rush job, my hands sweat like crazy. I'm still relatively new to stringing so any tips would help. I keep thinking if I'm having trouble with this noodley stuff, how am i going to handle something stiff like BBO??

    How much do you guys increase the tension before tie offs? I actually just recently learned of this and plan to do some light experiments so I can get my tension true to racquet tune. I heard that a increase of between 5-8lbs on the last two crosses/mains(on my dropweight) would compensate for the loose knots and string from tie offs. True or false?

    What easy knots do you guys recommend for stringing? 15-17g strings i use all Wilson Pro Knots, but anything thinner I try to do a bulky knot, but it looks sloppy sometimes.
     
    #1
  2. Irvin

    Irvin G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2007
    Messages:
    12,080
    Location:
    Marietta, Ga
    The problem with ported racket is the string must stay near the bottom of the port when you string the racket from the top down. Because the turn table pivot point is below the port in the top half of the racket the string tends to stay in the top of the port. So Prince uses a boomerang to hold the string in the bottom of the port. The S hook holds the string down by hooking into the next lower port with the bottom hook and the string is ran through the top hook. This holds the string an equal distance from the lower port. Problem is that distance is not exactly the same every time so you string are going to be crooked.

    The easiest way (for all stringers) to get the strings straight is to use the 2 piece 50/50. That way when you string from the center up the string stays in the top portion of the port because the pivot point of the turn table is below the port. The string will be straight. And when you string from the center because the pivot point is above the ports the string stays in the bottom of the port.
     
    #2
  3. COPEY

    COPEY Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2008
    Messages:
    1,543
    I'm a big proponent of the s-hook method, however, if your machine has a good brake this method is pointless. If you know how to use the 50/50 method you can compare the two and figure out which one you prefer. Quite a few people use the 50/50 or a boomerang. I've tried the boomerang and it works fine, however, on occasion they pop out of place, which isn't a huge deal, but with the s-hook that's never an issue. The 50/50 method was fine as well, but I simply prefer the simplicity of the s-hook. There was something about starting in the middle of the racquet and being obligated to use a starting clamp that didn't quite sit well with me, didn't seem as seamless as using the s-hook. Anyway, your opinion may be different. Try it and see what you think - it's a cheap experiment.

    I'll let others address your remaining questions as I'm short on time. Good luck!
     
    #3
  4. COPEY

    COPEY Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2008
    Messages:
    1,543
    Ok I do have enough time to address this statement. To be clear, using the 50/50 method allows the string to align properly with the ports, so in that sense they start off straight, but it doesn't mean your strings will be any straighter if you don't push against the string as you tension or straighten them after the job is complete; you'll still have some frowning.
     
    #4
  5. sansaephanh

    sansaephanh Professional

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2009
    Messages:
    1,166
    Location:
    Oakland
    i meant straight strings on any racket. I have all sorts of frowning. My jobs just don't look as clean as from someone else
     
    #5
  6. Lakers4Life

    Lakers4Life Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2009
    Messages:
    3,638
    Location:
    Laker Land
    That's what the setting off tool (Blunt Awl) is for.
     
    #6
  7. sansaephanh

    sansaephanh Professional

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2009
    Messages:
    1,166
    Location:
    Oakland
    Hmm... must learn how to use...
     
    #7
  8. mad dog1

    mad dog1 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2010
    Messages:
    4,859
    what L4L says is true, but you can straighten the cross strings as you're stringing w/ your fingers. it's not hard and it's cheaper than buying a blunt awl.

    if your cross strings aren't straight as you're tensioning, the tension in the crosses will be lower than if they are as straight as possible.
     
    #8
  9. Lakers4Life

    Lakers4Life Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2009
    Messages:
    3,638
    Location:
    Laker Land
    Watch a few videos on stringing at a Grand Slam even. I recall US Open and a French Open videos with the stringer using a blunt awl after stringing.

    If you have a bench grinder and screw driver you don't really like, you can round off the tip.

    True, you can try to straighten the crosses as you tension them, but if you do a lot of rackets, your finger tips will hurt after a while. Unless you have guitar player's callouses.
     
    #9
  10. fortun8son

    fortun8son Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2011
    Messages:
    3,144
    Location:
    The Desert
    I use my fingers, but then again, I have bass players' callouses. :)
     
    #10
  11. mad dog1

    mad dog1 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2010
    Messages:
    4,859
    i doubt if sansaephanh does as much volume as you. probably strings a couple of sticks per week so likely not enough to hurt the fingertips.
     
    #11
  12. Lakers4Life

    Lakers4Life Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2009
    Messages:
    3,638
    Location:
    Laker Land
    #12
  13. coachrick

    coachrick Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    2,157
    Location:
    Austin, hook 'em, Texas
    Weaving one cross ahead of the one you're tensioning will eliminate much of the 'frowning'; but you will still need to fine-tune as you go and when finished.

    I've strung 22 rackets non-stop with 'typical' synthetic and didn't need a blunt awl for any of them. On the other hand, all it takes is one small cut or split in your fingertips to create an entirely different type of 'frown' :( . My blunt awl is around here somewhere in case I need it. ;) Actually, I use a pair of smooth curved-needle-nose pliers to straighten the difficult strings when needed.
     
    #13
  14. Tennusdude

    Tennusdude Rookie

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2012
    Messages:
    361
    I really dont agree that the boomerang works fine. Cross strings seem to lose a substantial amount of tension especially on the Prince EXO3 Silver, although there seem be tension loss on all Prince EXO3 when using boomerang due to the fact that cross string is not even close to being horizontal while being tensioned. Irvin what is your opinion on this?>
     
    #14
  15. zapvor

    zapvor Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2006
    Messages:
    9,132
    Location:
    tennis courts
    i just use my fingers. for me its crucial to do this with prestiges because of the pattern.
     
    #15
  16. Lakers4Life

    Lakers4Life Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2009
    Messages:
    3,638
    Location:
    Laker Land
    I disagree, all "one ahead" does is make it easier to weave the crosses, because the last tensioned cross will be the same weave. I don't think it prevents frowning, becuase the "one ahead" weave has no tension.
     
    #16
  17. sansaephanh

    sansaephanh Professional

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2009
    Messages:
    1,166
    Location:
    Oakland
    so guys. What is the general rule of them for tension higher for the last crosses/mains? I lose a ton when i tie my knots and am just wondering what I can do to make sure I account for it.
     
    #17
  18. Irvin

    Irvin G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2007
    Messages:
    12,080
    Location:
    Marietta, Ga
    There is no general rule. Best thing to do is learn to tie your knots better or use a better knot. Have you tried the VS Starting knot?
     
    #18
  19. Chotobaka

    Chotobaka Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 19, 2012
    Messages:
    2,494
    You can always "cheat" by hand pulling tension with cam pliers and holding tension with a lubed awl. Or, over-tension your last pulls to compensate. Best is to just keep developing your tie off skills as mentioned by others here.
     
    #19
  20. sansaephanh

    sansaephanh Professional

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2009
    Messages:
    1,166
    Location:
    Oakland
    No i haven't I usually just use wilson pro not until the gauge is too thick
     
    #20
  21. volusiano

    volusiano Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2006
    Messages:
    1,635
    I've come across threads here before that suggested as much as 8 lbs increase on the last pull to compensate for the tension loss due to the knot. But that was a long time ago. It's really up to you to know how tight of a knot you can tie and decide how much to compensate for it.
     
    #21

Share This Page