About Fed being washed up....

[McEnborg]

Some of you whom don't respect this guy are really rather pathetic. He's the greatest player in the history of the game and keeps proving it.

There is simply no way anybody can put another player over Roger. Let's see how well Rafa and Novak are playing at ages 29 and 30. Novak is the best player now but has a long way to go to be in Roger's stratosphere.

69 tournament titles now and counting. In his last 34 slam appearances, he's won 16 majors, been the finalist in 7, semi-finalist in 6, QF in 3 and one 4th round. His major winning percentage in the last 9 years is 90%. His overall winning percentage for his career is 83%-better than Lendl, Connors, Borg, McEnroe, Sampras and anyone else.

His body of work is incomprehensible. There's nothing more he has to prove but he keeps proving it. 18 Masters's titles along with 12 finals. Incredible.

 

[InspectorRacquet]

This sounds like another GOAT argument coming from another Federer fan. Federer isn't washed up quite yet, as many people claim, and is still a definite contender as proven by his tournament performances this year. I am a Fed fan myself, but I wouldn't go as far as to completely ignore Djokovic and Nadal quite yet.

 

[hawk eye]

No way pal.. he's go a long way to go still.
He needs to to show he didn't get his reputation in the weakest era of tennis history.
Yes he did win today, but he didn't have to beat any of his rivals who most of the time he can't keep up with.

Olympics he needs to win, show that his FO win was no fluke, win Rome, Monte Carlo, time travel back to the nineties to see if he can at least make a semifinal in a slam..

 

[McEnborg]

Olympics he needs to win, show that his FO win was no fluke, win Rome, Monte Carlo, time travel back to the nineties to see if he can at least make a semifinal in a slam..[/QUOTE]

Are you serious????????????? He's been in FIVE French finals-losing to the greatest clay courter in history. You're on drugs.

Also, Federer has beaten Novak many times and has 8 wins over Rafa as well. He's beaten many many great players again and again. The players of the last 8 years are even MORE athletic and MORE powerful with their shots.

 

[Povl Carstensen]

No way pal.. he's go a long way to go still.
He needs to to show he didn't get his reputation in the weakest era of tennis history.
Yes he did win today, but he didn't have to beat any of his rivals who most of the time he can't keep up with.

Olympics he needs to win, show that his FO win was no fluke, win Rome, Monte Carlo, time travel back to the nineties to see if he can at least make a semifinal in a slam..

I think you got a way to go.

 

[The Bawss]

No way pal.. he's go a long way to go still.
He needs to to show he didn't get his reputation in the weakest era of tennis history.
Yes he did win today, but he didn't have to beat any of his rivals who most of the time he can't keep up with.

Olympics he needs to win, show that his FO win was no fluke, win Rome, Monte Carlo, time travel back to the nineties to see if he can at least make a semifinal in a slam..

Does it hurt Trolling that hard?