All of these players have accomplished something that Federer has not...

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by travlerajm, Feb 11, 2012.

  1. Sentinel

    Sentinel Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2008
    Messages:
    30,384
    Location:
    Somewhere over the rainbow
    Been able to credit their opponents after a loss. ??
     
    #51
  2. CDNguy87

    CDNguy87 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2009
    Messages:
    1,570
    Very interesting. I'd never thought about that before.

    I remember the media would talk about how Tiger Woods had never won a golf major when trailing before the final round, which is pretty much the equivalent of this. I really don't think you could say it takes anything away from Federer's career....that's essentially punishing him for being so dominant and well-regarded in his prime. If he wasn't nearly as good, he may have been viewed as the underdog in more slam finals and thus been more likely to accomplish the feat. That's a pretty perverse result.

    How many slam finals has Federer been the underdog in anyway? It's just the 4 FO finals against Rafa, correct? Definitely not really fair to hold those too much against him (I'm assuming he was favoured in AO 2009).

    Interesting related question: if Federer had converted match point against Djoker in either of the last 2 USOs, would he have been favoured against Rafa in the final? I doubt for 2010 since that was prime Rafa, but last year Rafa was considerably weaker and Fed gave him a good run at the FO. I think the odds would have been close.

    And Djoker's win at Wimbledon last year should definitely count as an underdog victory...we need to have some objective measure of the term "underdog" and "favourite" or else it becomes pretty pointless. If the bookies all have one player as a favourite, that should be the determinant.
     
    #52
  3. Mike Sams

    Mike Sams Legend

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2011
    Messages:
    5,270
    :lol: :lol: Win!
     
    #53
  4. roundiesee

    roundiesee Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2004
    Messages:
    2,861
    I don't think Roger's 16 slams should be discredited because he was the favourite in almost all of them (actually I thought he was a slight underdog against an accomplished grasscourt player in his first slam final against Mark Philippoussis), but the OP does have a point. Just like Tiger, he should one day win a big one when the odds are stacked against him. I think he can if he puts his mind to it, just that he often gets discouraged when the going gets tough.
     
    #54
  5. drakulie

    drakulie Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    24,466
    Location:
    FT. Lauderdale, Florida
    win after being two sets to none down.
     
    #55
  6. FEDERERNADAL13

    FEDERERNADAL13 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2009
    Messages:
    3,430
    Falla at Wimby 10 ;)
     
    #56
  7. flyinghippos101

    flyinghippos101 Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2009
    Messages:
    5,311
    Dancevic: Qualifier Grand Slam
     
    #57
  8. autumn_leaf

    autumn_leaf Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2007
    Messages:
    1,928
    Location:
    Taunton, MA
    Sorry, totally forgot it was the semi-final. Don't think I watched the finals that year.

    Still don't really think it matters though. I mean. Think about how many people on this thread that even guessed the answer. I don't think a come from behind victory is on many peoples' mind.
     
    #58
  9. Sid_Vicious

    Sid_Vicious G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2010
    Messages:
    11,681
    Location:
    In The City
    And...


    Wessels USO '00
    Sargsian RG '01
    Nadal Miami '05
    Berdych AO '09
    Haas FO '09
     
    #59
  10. roysid

    roysid Professional

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2006
    Messages:
    1,402
    It's very debatable record.
    A better record would be whether he beat No.1 in grand slam (don't think Fed has done it ever). Or whether he saved match point in a grand slam match and went on to win the tournament (Sampras, Becker, Gaudio etc. have done it).
     
    #60
  11. roysid

    roysid Professional

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2006
    Messages:
    1,402
    -Djokovic was clearly underdog in the Wimbledon final. Because he was playing two time defending champion.

    - On similar lines, Nadal was underdog in 2008 wimbledon final despite owning Federer in 2008.
     
    #61
  12. roysid

    roysid Professional

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2006
    Messages:
    1,402
    Come to think of it, Fed has defeated players in slam where he was clearly the underdog by playing exceptionally well. Not in finals, though.

    - 2001 Wimbledon vs Pete Sampras
    - 2003 Wimbledon vs Andy Roddick (ok not so underdog)
    - 2011 French Open vs Novak Djokovic
     
    #62
  13. Agassifan

    Agassifan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2009
    Messages:
    2,544
    Ha ha!! End of thread.
     
    #63
  14. devila

    devila Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2004
    Messages:
    1,749
    no one else in history surrendered 2 slam matches from 2 match points up. not once but twice to djokovic. last year, federer lost to an injured djokovic after getting the first two sets gifted to him.

    fed's the only one who lost us open matches back to back years from 2 match points up while
    ranked in the top 2 or 3.

    fed's the only one in history to lose wimbledon and us open matches from 2 sets up while
    ranked in the top 3.

    fed's the only former top 2 or 3 player who lost a 2 set lead in davis cup, wimbledon, us open & masters cup.
     
    #64
  15. Sid_Vicious

    Sid_Vicious G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2010
    Messages:
    11,681
    Location:
    In The City
    [​IMG]
     
    #65

Share This Page