Andy Roddick - 2010 Australian Open Champ If...

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by tvp900, Oct 8, 2009.

  1. tvp900

    tvp900 Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2008
    Messages:
    217
    I think if Roddick were to win any other slam, he needs to improve his break point conversion percentage and beef up his return of serve in both percentage and placement. Plus, maybe he needs to increase his diversity on first and second serves. Traditionally, his first serve is either a huge flat one down the T or a slice out wide, while his second serve is almost always a kicker to the backhand side. Personally, I think the body serve is always a good choice for Roddick as nobody wants a ball coming upwards of 140 mph at their chest.

    Now, aside from there being no Federer, Nadal, or Del potro, what does he need to improve in the offseason this year in order to win the AO in January?
     
  2. flyinghippos101

    flyinghippos101 Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2009
    Messages:
    5,298
    Sorry but if Roddick's going to win another slam, it will be at wimbledon. Of course pending Federer and Nadal's retirement
     
  3. MajinX

    MajinX Professional

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2008
    Messages:
    1,185
    Location:
    Toronto
    its hard to say that after he gave federer his hardest grandslam win in his career so far. I think Nadal vs Roddick at wimbledon would be very interesting altho nadal's game is good against roddicks.
     
  4. Toxicmilk

    Toxicmilk Professional

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2008
    Messages:
    916
    Andy Roddick would win the _____ GS in 2010 if he can beat Federer =D
     
  5. Conquistador

    Conquistador Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2008
    Messages:
    2,192
    Roger Federer is scheduled to play in that event. Just to let you know.
     
  6. wyutani

    wyutani Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2006
    Messages:
    4,760
    Location:
    hong kong
    IF there is no fed.
     
  7. SuperDuy

    SuperDuy Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2009
    Messages:
    2,518
    Obviusly it a GS>
     
  8. veroniquem

    veroniquem Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2008
    Messages:
    30,950
    Location:
    New York
    If the current top 5 retires :???:
     
  9. Toxicmilk

    Toxicmilk Professional

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2008
    Messages:
    916
    Donald Young would prob become goat first =/
     
  10. MichaelNadal

    MichaelNadal Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2007
    Messages:
    28,797
    Location:
    Tuning Up The Band...
    Andy's best chance was Wimby this year, its not going to happen.
     
  11. IvanAndreevich

    IvanAndreevich Legend

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2007
    Messages:
    7,493
    Location:
    Vancouver, BC
    Roddick's never been past the semis in Australia. Then again, that's because of his Federer problem.
     
  12. edmondsm

    edmondsm Legend

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2005
    Messages:
    6,902
    Location:
    In an in between place.
    I hate it, but I think Roddick's will might have finally been broken this year. He was right there at Wimbledon, it was on his racquet, he blew it. Then John Isner finished him off. He's rebounded so many times, and always come up short. It's sad.
     
  13. norbac

    norbac Legend

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2008
    Messages:
    8,487
    Sadly, I think you may just be right...it would be amazing if he came back strong next season though(in the Slams I mean)....
     
  14. federerfanatic

    federerfanatic Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2007
    Messages:
    3,046
    Not a chance. Federer, Del Potro, and Murray are all too good for him on a hard court. Nadal if healthy probably is too. He has done well vs Djokovic this year but Djokovic is still the better player right now. There are too many guys above him, too many big threats to win a hard court slam now for him to ever do it. If he has any shot it is Wimbledon but I dont see it happening even there for him. Sadly he has probably won his only slam already, this years Wimbledon was his best last shot of another.
     
  15. ceberus

    ceberus Guest

    He missed it at Wimbledon this year. It's over for him.
     
  16. tennis_hand

    tennis_hand Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2006
    Messages:
    4,427
    his only chance to win is to conserve his energy until Fed is old or retired.

    so, I think, he should retire now and come back after 2012.
     
  17. egn

    egn Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2008
    Messages:
    4,973
    Murray is on Fed's and Del Po's side.
    Murray beats Del Po in the quarters and Fed in the semis.
    Nadal loses early.
    Roddick gets Djoker on a hot Aussie day.
    Roddick beats Djoker and then beats Murray the choke artist.

    I think that is the only reasonable way that Roddick can win it. He has a hex on Djokovic right now and if any of the top 5 is to blow it in a final it has to be Murray. Del Po has gotten over the nerves since that beatdown Fed handed him at the AO last year and his power game could cause old Roddick some issues. The Fed and Nadal problems are obvious. Murray it all depends on if he can make it to the final and then basically Roddick has to play one real match.
     
  18. vandre

    vandre Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2007
    Messages:
    1,739
    Location:
    no man's land
    this. 10 char

    its all right there in my sig.
     
  19. NamRanger

    NamRanger G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2005
    Messages:
    13,916
    Prediction for Roddick were way worse before this season. Most said he wouldn't have made a SF. Let's actually wait and see how he plays in the last few major tournaments before making any judgments people.



    A. Roddick needs to hit bigger off the forehand still. Not all out on every shot, but he needs a shot to follow up his serve, as his serve is getting neutralized too often.

    B. Roddick needs to continue to improve his backhand and improve his return of serve. Needs to take some bigger cuts on the ball.

    C. Roddick needs to stop playing passive and just play more aggressive tennis. It is one thing to be patient; it is another to be passive and allow your opponent to take over.
     
  20. tvp900

    tvp900 Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2008
    Messages:
    217
    I totally agree with 'C'. I like that he's learning patience, but don't like that he's falling asleep at the baseline.
     
  21. kishnabe

    kishnabe G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2008
    Messages:
    17,086
    Location:
    Toronto
    Well you never know what going to happen. But i would prefer roddick to win wimbledon, since it was his dream when watching that show "breakfast with wimbledon". Australian maybe 2011 since every odd year he makes the semi's. Frech Open only if he get's a year like Mac in 1984. US open is reasonable, i would say 2011 us open.
     
  22. Jason Vorhees

    Jason Vorhees Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2009
    Messages:
    81
    Seeing as it's Roddick's lifelong dream to win wimbledon, i hope he gets it. Hopefully it's not a dream that won't get fulfilled. Hopefully Federer retires at the end of the year.
     
  23. I think he has more chance at USO or Wimby. But that's difficult and perhaps impossible, too, and time is working against him.

    Besides, he plays too much like a pusher these days. In some moments, honestly, he seems like the worst pusher on tour, way above Murray.
     
  24. Jason Vorhees

    Jason Vorhees Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2009
    Messages:
    81
    The difference between roddick and murray is that roddick does have 2 huge weapons (serve & forehand) but doesn't use one of them. Murray HAS to push because he has no big weapons.

    Agree with what your saying at the top part though, but i would say he's a contender for AO. Obviously the top 5 are firm favourites, but A-rod can cause an upset aswell.
     
  25. Cyan

    Cyan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2007
    Messages:
    3,372
    His best chance is at Wimbledon in the future. Too many good players on HC these days...
     
  26. tyro

    tyro New User

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2004
    Messages:
    77
    All good points, especially about the need to take a few more chances with his forehand. His return game looked much better at Wimby this year. He'd need to keep that up.

    And someone else would have to take out Fed. I guess Roddick can hope that Fed's motivation will falter just a bit now that he's in the record books. Not likely, but not out of the question, either.

    --Tyro

    http://tenniswire.wordpress.com
     
  27. DownTheLine

    DownTheLine Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2009
    Messages:
    2,406
    It was the longest not the hardest.
     
  28. Jason Vorhees

    Jason Vorhees Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2009
    Messages:
    81
    You're forgetting that roddick has come the closest bar nadal from beating Federer at Wimbledon, and Roddick should have won in 4 sets at the very least. If anyone can beat federer on grass besides nadal, it's roddick. Murray/djokovic fans will deny this, but it's true.
     
  29. SuperDuy

    SuperDuy Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2009
    Messages:
    2,518
    Andy will win the AO and Wimbledon!
     
  30. jamesblakefan#1

    jamesblakefan#1 G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2007
    Messages:
    15,689
    Location:
    VA Beach
  31. Jason Vorhees

    Jason Vorhees Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2009
    Messages:
    81
    Well at least he got there and maxed out his potential. I for one didn't see him making a slam QTF this year. Turns out i was wrong.

    Do you think he overachieved?
     
  32. jamesblakefan#1

    jamesblakefan#1 G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2007
    Messages:
    15,689
    Location:
    VA Beach
    I think he was overhyped by the media, who were quick to peg him as the next Sampras/Agassi and win as many slams as those guys did. You can see part of that in that piece.

    But he's done all he could with Federer around. He's just not better than Fed. But in any era I don't see him winning more than 3 slams, so on that end...he's not the huge underachiever some peg him out to be. He's definitely a top 5 player of this decade, behind Fed, Nadal, and Hewitt.
     
  33. Jason Vorhees

    Jason Vorhees Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2009
    Messages:
    81
    Maybe more than 3 slams. I feel Safin,Hewitt and Roddick would be equal on slams right now if Federer wasn't around.

    But to be honest, Roddick can't blame Federer for his 'underachieving'. He's had his chances against federer quite a few times in slams. He should have won wimbledon 04 and 09, but just failed, had chances in the 3rd set at US open 2006. IMO Roddick was/is good enough to take Federer out.

    As for Hewitt, i think he was the 'lucky' guy out of everyone - know what i mean.
     
  34. P_Agony

    P_Agony Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2008
    Messages:
    13,186
    Right, because Roddick cannot beat Murray and Djokovic. He was just lucky to beat Murray in the Wimbly SF and was just lucky to beat Djokovic 3 times this year.
     
  35. flying24

    flying24 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2006
    Messages:
    1,924
    If you did take Federer out then it indeed would be an unusually weak era all things considered. What JBF said is still correct, put him in any other era, not taking out such and such player who is there, and he doesnt win more than 3 slams in any (less in quite a few of them).

    As for the 2006 U.S Open final Federer ended that match with over double the winners of Roddick despite that Roddick was playing well. Federer squandered more break points in the 3rd set than did Rodidck and still won it. Roddick was lucky if anything to make it as close as he did.
     
  36. flying24

    flying24 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2006
    Messages:
    1,924
    Grass is probably the only surface he can beat Murray. I would never put my money on Roddick vs Murray on a hard court at any point in the future, including even in a slam. This thead is about the Australian Open. Djokovic you have a point on, however if Djokovic finds his best form again grass would probably be the only surface Roddick would come out on top.
     
  37. World Beater

    World Beater Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2007
    Messages:
    2,745
    kind of weird for you to say that.

    everyone from borg to becker were incredibly impressed with roddick when he first came out.

    it wasn't just the media, but past players were impressed with his power game.

    also, the whole weak era would not make any sense because even in 2003, it was considered an incredibly strong era - sampras himself thought players were getting too good and that things are too deep. mcenroe included.

    who could fault them? roddick, federer and ferrero were all formidable in 2003.

    then federer just takes the whole game to new level and his detractors/critics cite the weak era argument - revisionist history, if you ask me.
     
  38. tvp900

    tvp900 Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2008
    Messages:
    217
    I remember a time when everyone thought the future of men's tennis was gonna be about Roddick Ferrero and Federer.
    Roddick - the big server with the big forehand, best suited to grass
    Ferrero - the ultimate grinder, best suited to clay
    Federer - the all-round player, at the time, suited to grass and hard courts
     
  39. Jason Vorhees

    Jason Vorhees Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2009
    Messages:
    81
    Ferrero faded away
    We know what happened to Fed & Andy
     
  40. NamRanger

    NamRanger G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2005
    Messages:
    13,916



    Djokovic even playing at his very best would have a tough time beating Roddick. Early 2008 when Djokovic was playing his best tennis, lost to Andy Roddick at Dubai on a fast court. It was a close match, but it's not like Roddick's going to roll over. His patient and passive game happens to work very well against Djokovic because he doesn't give him any angles, which makes Djokovic go for too much and make errors.
     
  41. grafselesfan

    grafselesfan Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2009
    Messages:
    3,594
    Dubai is a lightning fast court the likes of which almost dont even exist on tour any longer, let alone any of the 4 slam surfaces.
     
  42. dropshot winner

    dropshot winner Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2009
    Messages:
    2,852
    Dubai isn't much faster than the US Open and Cincinatti.
     
  43. grafselesfan

    grafselesfan Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2009
    Messages:
    3,594
    Sure, the U.S Open in 1997 maybe. Dont even get me started on Cincinnati. A guy like Roddick is actually one of the unlucky ones with the slowing of surfaces today. I am not a Roddick fan with his serve he would he would be an even tougher player under the old court conditions, particularly amongst the field of baseline specialists of today.
     
  44. dropshot winner

    dropshot winner Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2009
    Messages:
    2,852
    The surfaces of Dubai and Cincinnati are similiar in speed.

    Obviously the air is different in Dubai (not just because it's indoor), and the balls might be too.
     
  45. NamRanger

    NamRanger G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2005
    Messages:
    13,916

    That's true, but Djokovic was no slouch that tournament. Both he and Roddick were serving out of trees (Roddick in particular, who served 13 aces against Nadal in one set) that tournament up to that point.



    I think when both play their best tennis, it's a good match because they are fairly even matched. Djokovic struggles a little bit on the forehand return, which Roddick abuses alot, while Roddick can't stand toe to toe with Djokovic in a baseline rally.



    It's not like Djokovic can roll over Roddick so easily as people think.
     

Share This Page