Andy Roddick makes Wimbledon Final

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by TacoBellBorderBowl1946, Jun 21, 2009.

  1. TacoBellBorderBowl1946

    TacoBellBorderBowl1946 Professional

    Joined:
    May 4, 2006
    Messages:
    1,085
    And loses to Federer in 4 sets. U heard it here first
     
    #1
  2. MajinX

    MajinX Professional

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2008
    Messages:
    1,185
    Location:
    Toronto
    wats with the obsession of saying things first.... someone wanna explain?
     
    #2
  3. Mick

    Mick Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2006
    Messages:
    8,362
    because if the prediction came true, people would think you're nostradamus the 2nd :)
     
    #3
  4. mondata

    mondata New User

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2009
    Messages:
    25
    I am a huge roddick fan. Can he get by del potro in the quarters and murray in the semis (if draw goes as planned). I am not sure. He is playing great but the crowd will really support Murray.
     
    #4
  5. TacoBellBorderBowl1946

    TacoBellBorderBowl1946 Professional

    Joined:
    May 4, 2006
    Messages:
    1,085
    delpo is new on grass and murray pushes sometimes. If murray and andy play i think its 50/50, depending on how andy hits his forehand.
     
    #5
  6. slicefox

    slicefox Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2007
    Messages:
    1,275
    Location:
    the hood
    meh, could be.

    but if you are wrong, then what?
     
    #6
  7. Nadal_Freak

    Nadal_Freak Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2006
    Messages:
    10,625
    Location:
    Harker Heights, Texas
    Not likely to happen but possible. It's also possible Roddick loses in second round. :evil:
     
    #7
  8. GPG

    GPG Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2009
    Messages:
    663
    Semifinals will be:

    Roddick - Gonzo / Haas - Roger
     
    #8
  9. malakas

    malakas Banned

    Joined:
    May 27, 2006
    Messages:
    15,791
    Location:
    Greece
    I don't like Roddick much..but I'm with you!!!:D
    Go Andy Roddick!!!!!
     
    #9
  10. Feña14

    Feña14 Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    5,377
    Location:
    England
    I think your prediction is good, but i'm saying Federer will beat him in 3.
     
    #10
  11. MegacedU

    MegacedU Professional

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2004
    Messages:
    1,328
    Location:
    Rhode Island
    I feel like Roddick is bound to win Wimby sometime and now is his time. I say Roddick wins final in straight sets. He's never very good after he drops a set.
     
    #11
  12. BullDogTennis

    BullDogTennis Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2008
    Messages:
    2,216
    Location:
    Big Orange Nation
    its also likely nadal wont be the #1 player in the world after this...
     
    #12
  13. Breaker

    Breaker Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2005
    Messages:
    7,725
    You made this thread 5 years late..
     
    #13
  14. MegacedU

    MegacedU Professional

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2004
    Messages:
    1,328
    Location:
    Rhode Island
    That's mean. Poor Andy Roddick. Just wait.
     
    #14
  15. DoubleDeuce

    DoubleDeuce Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2008
    Messages:
    2,288
    Location:
    South
    Would love to see Andy go deep , much better to watch than many
     
    #15
  16. Commando Tennis Shorts

    Commando Tennis Shorts Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2007
    Messages:
    1,708
    I love this prediction. Most are making "predictions" about a Fed-Murray final. As if that could even be called a prediction. This prediction, though, has stones. It has a massive amount of cajones, as they say. I hope this is right, just so TW posters can suck it.

    That being said, I'm going with Murray in the semi against Roddick to make it to the final---aw, screw it. I'm with you, OP, except I'm going with Roddick the whole way. Let's just go for broke. Go Andy!

    By the way, this one's for the haters---**** ***!!!!!!!!!!!!
     
    #16
  17. Commando Tennis Shorts

    Commando Tennis Shorts Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2007
    Messages:
    1,708
    Hmmm, strange that got edited, except not
     
    #17
  18. galactico

    galactico Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2009
    Messages:
    246
    agree, roddick has the weapons, he just needs to use them
     
    #18
  19. tacou

    tacou Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2007
    Messages:
    7,036
    agreed .
     
    #19
  20. sureshs

    sureshs Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2005
    Messages:
    35,055
    This is Roddick's year
     
    #20
  21. egn

    egn Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2008
    Messages:
    4,973
    If Roddick can play consistently like he did in the AO he will be through to the semis at least and then it is all about stepping up his game against Murray. However Roddick and Murray are not your most consistent slam performers lets see them both meet in the semis first.
     
    #21
  22. Nadal_Freak

    Nadal_Freak Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2006
    Messages:
    10,625
    Location:
    Harker Heights, Texas
    This is a thread on Roddick. Stop changing the subject.
     
    #22
  23. NamRanger

    NamRanger G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2005
    Messages:
    13,916


    Looks like someone touched a sensitive nerve.
     
    #23
  24. Nadal_Freak

    Nadal_Freak Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2006
    Messages:
    10,625
    Location:
    Harker Heights, Texas
    No. I just don't like people like you bashing Nadal in every thread just because they don't agree with what I said. Going off topic like everything is totally uncalled for.
     
    #24
  25. thalivest

    thalivest Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2007
    Messages:
    4,486
    Location:
    Toronto, Ontario
    The one silver lining of Nadal's sad injury situation and missing Wimbledon is he could be fresher than ever for the U.S Open. I hope so anyway! I would love to see him atleast make the final this year there, maybe even win and complete his own Career Slam.
     
    #25
  26. NamRanger

    NamRanger G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2005
    Messages:
    13,916


    Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.....................






    [​IMG]
     
    #26
  27. zagor

    zagor Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2007
    Messages:
    26,016
    Location:
    Weak era
    It would be quite amazing to see 2 legends like Fed and Nadal complete the career slam in the same year.

    Agassi's stock would drop quite a bit though if that happened even though he completed his career slam in way more polarizing conditions than Fed and (potentially if he wins USO)Nadal.
     
    #27
  28. thalivest

    thalivest Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2007
    Messages:
    4,486
    Location:
    Toronto, Ontario
    Some people think I come across as anti-Agassi but I am not. I look that way since I point out the deficits in his career and record compared to other truly great players which many of his supporters seem to ignore. I actualy liked him when he played and I was so annoyed with him just tanking all of 96-98 all because of one dissapointing U.S Open final loss. I do wish he had beaten Sampras in the 95 U.S Open final as I think his career might have been alot different if he had, but that was no excuse to throw away 3 or so years of what would have been the prime of his career (hence now saying he hardly a prime which is true). With Becker hardly playing after 95 (although the little tennis he played in 96 was probably his best tennis since 89 so such a shame he didnt stay healthy that year), Edberg retiring, Courier washed up, the game suffered tremendously with Agassi's slump. The popularity really dipped from 96-98 and the continuation of a Sampras and Agassi rivalry, with Chang playing well as well, would have been so much better for tennis as a whole as well as Agassi's own career. That is why it is kind of funny to see Kafelnikov or Krajicek types who won their slams during the Agassi sabatical (not saying Agassi would have stopped them but just saying this is what was filling the void during the Agassi MIA) glorified now as I remember when they won their slams and people tried to market them as new faces or stars of the game the tennis viewing public all seemed to yawn and ask where Becker and Agassi where. It would be funny to see what these same people gloriying them now really thought back then as well.

    When analyzing his career his lack of dominance, his lack of success vs tough opponents (he was even owned by a prime Courier, and in big matches- not small tournaments like Murray vs Federer so far), and his terrible consistency by the very high standards given to a many time slam winner puts him another level altogether below the likes of Lendl, Connors, even McEnroe. Agassi's career slam was a great feat but I thought it was always excessively built up, and yes Federer and Nadal both completing it in the same year would drop his stock and the reverence given to that particular feat further. Djokovic or/and Murray could even complete the career slam someday too, and I think many will in the future.

    Mind you if it wasnt for Agassi's career slam, say had he not won one of his 92 Wimbledon or his 99 French, he would probably now rank below Edberg, Becker, Wilander, all time. So clearly it did boost his career to what it would have been without it. Even with it he still should rank below Lendl, McEnroe, and Connors clearly thugh.
     
    Last edited: Jun 22, 2009
    #28
  29. BreakPoint

    BreakPoint Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    43,454
    Don't worry, people who claim they said it first are ALWAYS wrong (except me). :) ;)
     
    #29
  30. zagor

    zagor Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2007
    Messages:
    26,016
    Location:
    Weak era
    Have to agree with most if not all of that.I think if he won USO '95 things could have definitely been different but you're right,for an all time great he never really had that period of domination and was very inconsistant during the whole 90s.He didn't even play his best slam-AO until he was like 25 or something for chrissake,had made lots of bad decisions and not enough dedication to the game when he was young.

    Still,he did complete his career slam in really polarizing conditions and was the only one(alteast that I know of)who ever won Wimbledon on fast grass from the baseline,I always greatly respected that accomplishment.

    He also had that great presence,tennis was just much richer with him around,not just because of his great game but amazing charisma as well.He certainly left a void when he left.
     
    #30
  31. BreakPoint

    BreakPoint Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    43,454
    Then why do you keep doing it by saying that Nadal is a wimp, that he can only play on one very particular surface, with only one particular type of ball, in only one particular altitude, that he has a one-dimensional game, that he's in poor physical condition, that he has no stamina, that's he's mentally weak, that he's too emotional, etc.? :confused:
     
    #31
  32. thalivest

    thalivest Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2007
    Messages:
    4,486
    Location:
    Toronto, Ontario
    Yeah he was definitely a big star of the sport even in his twilight years. He always had that intangible star appeal that neither Sampras or Federer, as great as they are, ever really had. Which is another reason it is even sadder he did not carry out his true prime and the cream of his rivalry with Sampras all the way from 1995-1999 like it should have. He was working, competing, and completely professional in his approach from 1999 onwards the way he should have been from 1990 onwards at a much younger more athletically primed age.

    Granted when you speak of winning the career slam in polarizing conditions, you know that only really is different at Wimbledon today and Federer has won Wimbledon 5 times so he was certain to have done it anyway. Who was going to stop him from winning even 1 Wimbledon amongst todays field, probably with the 90s grass he might have won maybe 6 since I grudgingly concede Nadal would probably find it tougher vs Federer on that grass, and that grass still probably wouldnt be enough to put say Roddick over the top vs Federer as the gap is just to much overall. In either case still many Wimbledons and definitely the career slam as the French Open courts are the same AFAIK. Nadal is too early to tell, first he has to complete the grand slam at the Open, then see what his Wimbledon record is in a few years to decide his likelihood to have won it on the old type of grass. Really Wimbledon up until a few years ago was the only grand slam surface changed though. Australian Open did change several years ago, but Federer won on the old rebound ace anyway, and Nadal would actually benefit from the old rebound ace vs the new AO courts.
     
    Last edited: Jun 22, 2009
    #32
  33. TacoBellBorderBowl1946

    TacoBellBorderBowl1946 Professional

    Joined:
    May 4, 2006
    Messages:
    1,085
    2 more matches. I like him against both Hewitt and Murray. Great match against Berdych
     
    #33
  34. batz

    batz G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2009
    Messages:
    14,579
    Berdych was a big result for ARod. I like him a lot - he's my favourite American player, but his game is tailor made for Murray IMO.
     
    #34
  35. TacoBellBorderBowl1946

    TacoBellBorderBowl1946 Professional

    Joined:
    May 4, 2006
    Messages:
    1,085
    one more match and he's there. He will have to play really better though.
     
    #35
  36. Feña14

    Feña14 Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    5,377
    Location:
    England
    Yup!

    Then it's all down to the score in sets to see who get's the perfect prediciton ;)
     
    #36
  37. Tennis_Maestro

    Tennis_Maestro Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2007
    Messages:
    4,101
    Location:
    England London
    Quit trying to copy me mate.

    06-22-2009, 05:17 AM

    It won't work for 2 purposes.. the date and the fact it ain't happening.
     
    #37
  38. TacoBellBorderBowl1946

    TacoBellBorderBowl1946 Professional

    Joined:
    May 4, 2006
    Messages:
    1,085
    the thing is andy has to hit through his forehand to have a chanced
     
    #38
  39. JeMar

    JeMar Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2008
    Messages:
    6,698
    Almost there!
     
    #39
  40. veroniquem

    veroniquem Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2008
    Messages:
    30,970
    Location:
    New York
    My prediction for the semi:
    Andy will win (yes I know, gutsy :))
     
    #40
  41. JeMar

    JeMar Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2008
    Messages:
    6,698
    Don't fall down off that limb you're going out on!
     
    #41
  42. TacoBellBorderBowl1946

    TacoBellBorderBowl1946 Professional

    Joined:
    May 4, 2006
    Messages:
    1,085
    well im going with andy roddick. hes been my favorite player for a while and he lost last year because he pushed

    but hes improved and if he hits through he can win
     
    #42
  43. FedFan_2009

    FedFan_2009 Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2009
    Messages:
    2,353
    Location:
    Cylon Base Ship
    200mph serve + 107mph forehand = victory over Fed in 3. Pray for death.
     
    #43
  44. TacoBellBorderBowl1946

    TacoBellBorderBowl1946 Professional

    Joined:
    May 4, 2006
    Messages:
    1,085
    I was right...... Tomorrow if andy plays well he can win it!!!!!!!!
     
    #44
  45. Nadalfan89

    Nadalfan89 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2009
    Messages:
    2,307
    200 mph serve? Pretty sure he set the all time record at 155mph...
     
    #45
  46. FedFan_2009

    FedFan_2009 Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2009
    Messages:
    2,353
    Location:
    Cylon Base Ship
    Well Andy is going to need 200mph serve + nuclear forehands to beat JesusFed.
     
    #46
  47. DoubleDeuce

    DoubleDeuce Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2008
    Messages:
    2,288
    Location:
    South
    Good call Taco,

    except 3 is more l;ike it.
     
    #47
  48. Feña14

    Feña14 Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    5,377
    Location:
    England
    You mean like that one? ;)
     
    #48
  49. Guru

    Guru Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2009
    Messages:
    591
    Good call. Hope you had money on this prediction
    I put money on Roddick winning the title. It was always unlikely
    but at 34/1 it was worth a bet after all anything can happen.

    Il be rooting for Roddick and my Money
    but Roger should win this in three sets.

    Roddick deserves this title more than anyone
    but it's a shame Federer (his daddy) stands in the way.
     
    #49
  50. DoubleDeuce

    DoubleDeuce Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2008
    Messages:
    2,288
    Location:
    South
    Yeaahhh :) that's it
     
    #50

Share This Page