gsquicksilver
Semi-Pro
chang was 1 match away from being #1 in the world in 1996, where he played sampras in the USO final. he was already ranked #2, and if he would have won that match, he would have been #1.
chang was 1 match away from being #1 in the world in 1996, where he played sampras in the USO final. he was already ranked #2, and if he would have won that match, he would have been #1.
USA had more medals. China had slightly more gold medals is all.
Have you seen Lindsey Nelson of USC? Very skinny.
wow. she must be really weak. what string tension is that? like 45 lbs?
Srichiphan was top 10, I think he would have to be about the closest asian to getting to number 1. Or the Armritage brothers
Will there ever be a asian no. 1 player?
Chinese population 1.4 billion, Japanese over 130 million, Korean 73 million and if you consider India asian's, then 1.1 billion.
With a large population base like that, shouldn't there be a asian (male or female) number 1 in the world?
Steal and burn their badminton racquets and give them tennis racquets!!!
I really don't know what the OP is getting at. That like America, the land of mass athletic talents (winning most medals in the Olympics after all) can not produce a decent soccer to compete in the world cup.
I disagree with the other posts and I think Asian has the body for tennis. What the Asian physique is know for is flexibility, the balance of strength more on the lower portion, and lighter weight. Aside from average height (which seem to be increasing by each generation) I think Asian actually has a very suitable body for tennis.
Of course the main problem is interest and culture. Tennis is probably growing but I think if any sport took the new sport spot light it would be basketball. But all of this is moot since athletics are such a low priority when standard of living it is so low. Even if Micheal Chang won a calendar slam all the poor and rural people don't have a TV to watch it.
Dude, Tennis is not an asian sport. Srichaphan was a real freak of nature. He would have been the GOAT now if he was born in the US.
Dude, Tennis is not an asian sport. Srichaphan was a real freak of nature. He would have been the GOAT now if he was born in the US.
less asians are suited for highly anaerobic sports, compared to blacks/white. of course there are exceptions. tennis players generally are exceptions, but for asians there has to be an exception within the exception
there are also problems of torso-limb ratios:
http://www.tmuscle.com/free_online_...peed_demons_the_domination_of_sport_by_blacks
asians play ping pong and badminton because it is less physical and takes a lesser body to play.
not suggesting that tennis is a tough sport, and also not suggesting that i am racist
Seems like an article written by a black man. If black people are so physically superior, then how come there isn't any black tennis champion apart from Arther Ashe?
Seems like an article written by a black man. If black people are so physically superior, then how come there isn't any black tennis champion apart from Arther Ashe?
I lol'ed at this, but I'm better at tennis anyways. Badminton is just a winter sport for me.
Fair to say the Chinese players are physically too small to have grand ambitions. Citing success in doubles was very apropos.ZHENG SAYS CHINA TOP PLAYER MATTER OF TIME
HONG KONG (AP)—Two-time Grand Slam doubles winner Zheng Jie says it’s a matter of time before China produces a top-10 singles player and predicts the next generation of her compatriots to surpass her results.
Zheng, who partnered Yan Zi to win both the Australian Open the Wimbledon titles in 2006 for China’s first Grand Slam titles, said both public interest in tennis and government support is on the rise in China, fostering an ideal breeding ground for future talent.
“It’s increased significantly from four or five years ago. Even when it comes to media interest, corporate sponsors—in every aspect, there is a deeper interest and understanding in tennis,” Zheng said Tuesday at a press conference in Hong Kong, where she is competing in an exhibition tournament ahead of this month’s Australian Open.
http://sports.yahoo.com/ten/news?slug=ap-zheng&prov=ap&type=lgns
Overall population doesn't matter only the tennis playing population.
In asian countries many are too poor to focus on athletics.
Also, priorities asian culture places success in education and careers above chasing the pipe dream of becoming a professional athlete.
Great post.
asians play ping pong and badminton because it is less physical and takes a lesser body to play.
not suggesting that tennis is a tough sport, and also not suggesting that i am racist
Agreed about doubles. But how about informal #3 in the pre Open Era (Ramanathan Krishnan), #21 (Ramesh Krishnan), #15 (Vijay Amritraj)?
How many Africans have been world number 1 in singles?
Yikes, I feel pretty offended just going through the first few pages. There's some serious ignorance going on in this thread. Guess asians are doomed to have lousy athletic careers because of our "lesser" bodies. Oh well, might as well become a doctor.